The Media's Obsession With Boulder's Blocked 'Assault Weapon' Ban Defies Logic
The suggestion that the ordinance could have prevented Monday's mass shooting is utterly implausible.
The suggestion that the ordinance could have prevented Monday's mass shooting is utterly implausible.
This awful gun control talking point won’t go away.
Under the First Amendment, the question of whether Assange qualifies as a legitimate journalist is irrelevant.
Thirteen years after Heller, it's time for the Supreme Court to settle whether the Second Amendment applies outside the home.
According to the dissent, the appeals court "has decided that the Second Amendment does not mean what it says."
My article considers the implications of a major takings case currently before the Supreme Court.
Cracking down on protesters angry about police violence doesn't exactly inspire civic trust.
but with "blurring images of [Susan] Muller's body and blood spatter."
Plus: Appeals court considers whether nonstop surveillance violate due process, Utah governor signs porn filter bill into law, and more...
The president has ordered the Education Department to consider rescinding reforms aimed at protecting the due process rights of accused students.
The former Trump campaign lawyer insists her allegations about systematic voting fraud were not "statements of fact."
It is hard to see how an "assault weapon" ban or expanded background checks could have prevented this attack.
In this post, I consider some additional issues that came up in the recent Supreme Court oral argument in an important takings case.
That’s a clearly established constitutional mandate, the Eighth Circuit holds, so a university can’t get qualified immunity from liability in such a case.
The Court seems likely to rule in favor of property rights in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid.
When Amazon won't sell your book, you can head to Barnes & Noble. When government cancels your expression, there's nowhere left to go.
Plus: Wisconsin may approve microschools, what will Biden Title IX guidance look like, and more...
I'm continuing to serialize a forthcoming article of mine that discusses (among other things) such a proposed interpretation of libel law.
Once an up-and-coming city, Portland was destroyed from within by radical activism and political ineptitude.
It strains credulity to believe random tweets can lead otherwise normal people to drive across the country and stage an insurrection.
whether the U.S., China, Israel, or anyone else.
In context, it seems clear that the post's reference to "Chinese" is indeed a reference to the Chinese government, not to people of Chinese extraction.
Politicians on the right and the left are coming for your free speech.
The court doesn't decide whether the column was libelous, but just that the National Review wasn't liable for Steyn's post, because Steyn wasn't an employee.
A bit of background on the current law of libel; I'll have more about the implications of this in an upcoming post.
Union resistance shut down last year’s effort.
Here's a better idea: Abolish the "Selective" Service.
I publish something about you on Jan. 1, but I don't learn that it's false until Jan. 2. You then sue me for not taking down the post—should my liability turn on my mental state as of Jan. 1, or as of the time you sue?
"Public access [to judicial records] serves to promote trustworthiness of the judicial process, to curb judicial abuses, and to provide the public with a more complete understanding of the judicial system, including a better perception of its fairness."
Texas state senators introduced a bill requiring the national anthem at all pro sports events.
"We don't need to use a faulty model and apply it to the very real terrorism problem that we have at home," says terrorism expert Max Abrahms.
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming law review article on the duty to correct your own libelous posts, once you learn that they are libelous.
Court records are generally public records, embarrassing as they might be for the parties.
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming law review article on this subject.
The awful events of January 6 accelerated trends in left-of-center circles, particularly within media and technology companies.
A Maryland court reverses a juvenile delinquency adjudication based on a supposed threat at school.
But the agreement could complicate Derek Chauvin's murder trial, and it leaves unresolved the question of whether qualified immunity would have blocked the lawsuit.
Obvious, but good to have a cite for that.
For possessing a gun while committing a crime—even when no one is killed—too many defendants are slammed with sentences decades or even centuries longer than justice demands.
Databases of involuntarily supplied identities make for a plug-and-play surveillance state.
Another article that I'm serializing over the coming days.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10