Carpet-Bombing: Wall-to-Wall Folly
'Death from Above' has shown little success as a long-term strategy against terrorists
'Death from Above' has shown little success as a long-term strategy against terrorists
Unkind words for Donald Trump, Chris Christie, John Kasich, Vladimir Putin and more, at 3 a.m. ET on Fox News
Did an Obama-administration policy prevent the feds from looking at Tashfeen Malik's social-media profiles? Yes and no.
Surveillance brought up in Republican debate.
A perfect storm of hysteria and anti-government sentiments will lead to...what, exactly?
Baffling contradictions about privacy or just old-fashioned blame-shifting?
Nothing about the word radical implies approval of aggression or terrorism.
8p ET on Fox Business Network: The mustachioed libertarian TV icon discusses the French retreat from liberty in the name of security.
The libertarian acting legend stands up for self-defense.
Not just another "transgendered leftist activist."
No-gun zones like the one in effect where the San Bernardino shooting took place are not only unconstitutional but also an invitation to disaster.
The explanation is far more political than religious.
Be there at 8 p.m. ET, with a midnight re-run, on Fox Business Network
Great moments in jihadist combat training.
Regardless of if and when he stumbles, Trump may have already set the tone for the 2016 race.
Unlike Obama's gun control proposals, armed citizens can stop mass shooters who are invisible until they strike.
Over one-third of the 680,000 suspected terrorists have "no recognized terrorist group affiliation."
You don't have to be a gun-lover to be worried about the vagueness of the language.
Two proposed laws could potentially violate the French constitution.
Barack Obama's latest hashtag campaign is especially sad coming from a constitutional law prof.
Tougher gun controls didn't help in California.
The president didn't lay out a new plan as much as remind us of what he's been doing for months already.
Words are words and bullets are bullets. You'd expect journalists to understand that.
Five ways to respond better.
A perfect storm for the policy agendas of gun grabbers and Muslim bashers, of right-wing and left-wing statists.
Inspiration from both al Qaeda and ISIS noted.
Expect their murders to spur rash of useless laws to restrict everything from guns to immigration to refugee status.
Farook may be Muslim, but he doesn't seem to match the ISIS profile.
God didn't reduce gun-violence rates to their lowest levels in 20 years. People and smart policies that liberalized gun laws did that.
A UK government pamphlet tells parents to watch out if their teen shows "mistrust of mainstream media" or appears "angry about government policies."
Thank God for a renewed sense of common purpose in these desultory, fractured, and hyper-partisan times.
Country will harbor single dudes only if they're gay, for now.
Panic-driven reactions to terrorism that make no sense upon reflection
Enough already with fighting the "long war" against terrorism in the "passive voice."
Inconveniently for the U.S. intelligence community, the Paris attacks had nothing to do with encrypted communications.
Warrantless raids, house arrests, limits on freedom of speech and assembly are just some of the measures used in the name of security.
Young and alienated, they tend to be uninterested in theology and not closely connected with the larger Muslim community.
Something else Donald Trump and Democrats have in common
No-fly zones and ground invasions aren't the solution
Grandstanding politicians fan fear, but don't know what they are talking about
More than 100 guests and staff being held hostage
The GOP succumbs to nativist hysteria in the wake of Paris attacks.
...rather than pretend whatever it is we're doing is something else.