The Queen Is Dead. Anarchy in the U.K.?
Plus: The editors respond to a question about the Forward Party.
Plus: The editors respond to a question about the Forward Party.
A lawsuit alleges that the social media giant "tries to conceal the dangerous and addictive nature of its product, lulling users and parents into a false sense of security."
Looking back at how abortion advertising bans played out last century may give us some idea what the future holds for speech about abortion.
What happens when YouTube and Facebook can be held liable for their users’ speech?
Massie was the only House member to vote against a resolution demanding social media companies do more to track and suppress antisemitic content.
Comparing Elon Musk and Barack Obama underscores why entrepreneurs, not politicians, are the more effective agents of social change.
While Americans debate what should be allowed on social media, the EU wants government to decide.
Plus: A court rejects a "discriminatory harassment" ban at a Florida university, a private space mission heads back to earth, and more...
Jeff Kosseff's The United States of Anonymous makes a strong case for letting people hide behind the First Amendment.
The author of the definitive history of Section 230 is back with a controversial new book, The United States of Anonymous.
The SAFE SEX Workers Study Act would look at the impact of FOSTA and the seizure of sites like Backpage and Rentboy.
In a statement respecting the denial of certiorari, Justice Thomas suggested some courts are adopting an overly expansive interpretation of the immunity conferred by Section 230.
The conservative think tank identifies some genuine concerns about tech companies, but gets the prescription wrong.
Plus: The #OldProProject, food truck police, and more...
A new 2022 law will punish anybody “aiding and abetting” unlicensed dealers. It will most certainly harm low-level workers.
While this is a problem, it's not one that scrapping Section 230 would solve.
My testimony today before a House Subcommittee on Communications & Technology hearing on proposed revisions to § 230.
My testimony today before a House Subcommittee on Communications & Technology hearing on proposed revisions to § 230.
My testimony today before a House Subcommittee on Communications & Technology hearing on proposed revisions to § 230.
My testimony today before a House Subcommittee on Communications & Technology hearing on proposed revisions to § 230.
My testimony today before a House Subcommittee on Communications & Technology hearing on proposed revisions to § 230.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar wants to put HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, the former California attorney general with a reputation for being a partisan hack, in charge of "health disinformation" online.
"The plaintiffs failed to make out a plausible claim that the Pulse massacre was an act of 'international terrorism' as that term is defined in the ATA."
Tech giants expressing openness to amending Section 230 are doing so out of naked self-interest, not the goodness of their hearts.
Plus: California can't limit private prisons, Yellen dismisses bank privacy concerns, and more...
Government restrictions on private editorial discretion violate the First Amendment.
Robby Soave doesn't like it when social media deplatforms users, but the far bigger threat comes from lawmakers on a mission.
The Reason senior editor argues that attempts to break up tech giants and rein in social media are based on flawed arguments.
Here’s why Section 230 is so important.
A federal judge says an anti-porn group's suit against Twitter can move forward, in a case that could portend a dangerous expansion of how courts define "sex trafficking."
Market power does not make a private company the equivalent of a government agency.
Plus: A possible breakthrough in cheap battery technology, a primer on inflation, the SCOTUS showdown over abortion, and more....
Federal health bureaucrats should stop scapegoating social media.
The controversial author on her acclaimed and condemned book, being deplatformed, and the future of free expression in an increasingly polarized marketplace of ideas
Plus: How Trump lost in 2020, Amazon seeks recusal of FTC chair, and more...
The only thing FOSTA has done is chill speech and make catching sex traffickers more difficult.
The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?
I don't know the correct level of content moderation by Facebook, Twitter, Google, or Amazon, and neither do you.
Though Trump is gone, the desire to bend the internet toward partisan goals is alive and well.
It's a working model for non-state governance in cyberspace that is vastly preferable to government control of social media.
Plus: The challenges of free speech on Twitter, the case against baseball bailouts, and more...
A new bill repurposes the war on terror's pro-snitching mantra by requiring that tech companies share user data with the federal government.
Imagine a world in which media outlets were unable or afraid to post video of police and other authorities acting reprehensibly.
Plus: Effort to decriminalize psychedelics gains traction in California, crony capitalism at its worst, and more...
A moot case about Trump blocking tweets leads to concerns that tech companies have too much control over speech.