Gun Rights in Joe Biden's America: Live With Jacob Sullum, Amy Swearer, and Nick Gillespie
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion about the Second Amendment, gun control, and mass shootings.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion about the Second Amendment, gun control, and mass shootings.
As usual, Biden's gun policy proposals bump up against reality.
His State of the Union address sketched a foreign policy that is reckless on some points, relatively restrained on others, and utterly uninterested in any real resolution to America’s lingering military entanglements.
In his State of the Union address Tuesday, President Joe Biden said that he wants to hold police "accountable." But he neglected to mention the elephant in the room.
Plus: Bill would make all social media platforms check IDs, appeals court rejects rent control challenge, and more...
These days, he may run for president. His politics have changed.
The president's State of the Union address re-upped a tired, old promise to spend more tax dollars on less infrastructure.
His administration has contributed to the problems Biden says he wants to solve.
Biden vowed to block any attempts to cut Social Security benefits, and Republicans made it clear that they have little appetite to try it.
What we can learn from the State of the Union addresses by Jimmy Carter in 1979, Richard Nixon in 1971, and JFK in 1963
Plus: Court denies motion to suppress January 6 geofence warrant, Texas may ban some immigrants from buying property, and more...
If you look closely, you'll find a lot of contradictions.
Biden sat in a truck that costs as much as $120,000 to promote a tax credit that only applies to electric vehicles retailing for up to $80,000.
Plus: The editors consider the ongoing debt ceiling drama and answer a listener question about ending the war on drugs.
The White House's idea of using Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to adopt rent control faces numerous legal and practical hurdles.
The president seems to have forgotten his concession that such laws leave murderers with plenty of options that are "just as deadly."
Educators should be responsible to parents and students, not to the government.
If Trump's handling of government secrets was "totally irresponsible," how should we describe Biden's conduct?
Plus: How credit card companies became the porn police, the failure of the FDA's ban on flavored vaping products, and more...
The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is supposed to insulate the U.S. from oil embargoes and foreign wars. More often, it has been used like an insurance policy for private companies.
The program differs in several ways from Uniting for Ukraine and other previous private migrant sponsorship policies.
The Biden administration's antitrust efforts are being shut down by judges, except for a single successful case where best-selling authors were involved.
From George Santos to Joe Biden, résumé padding is unacceptable. But it's all the lies about legislation we can't afford.
Plus: The editors field a listener question on college admissions and affirmative action.
The underwhelming vice presidency of an unpopular former prosecutor has created a succession problem for the Democrats.
The underwhelming vice presidency of an unpopular former prosecutor has created a succession problem for the Democrats.
It's not Trump vs. Biden: High officials play fast and loose with government secrets, but only regular people face harsh penalties.
Hunter Biden's attorneys make a curious argument to oppose his daughter taking his name.
Prosecuting Trump for keeping government records at Mar-a-Lago now seems doomed for political as well as legal reasons.
The slippery slope of political fabulism, from the "Jew-ish" freshman representative to the president of the United States.
Plus: Lab-grown meat, the allure of raw milk, and more...
In both cases, proving criminal intent would be a tall order.
Plus: a lightning round recollection of comical political fabulists
Analysts differ on whether their net impact is more pro-immigration or more restrictionist. On balance, I think the former is closer to the truth. But there is some uncertainty here.
There's still much more to be done to establish fair and efficient processes at the border.
The move is a step in the right direction. But it has limitations and is combined with harmful "border enforcement" measures.
Plus: Would Adam Smith be a libertarian if he were alive today?
The article explains why the progam is a major improvement over previous policies, and how it can be further improved and made a model for refugee policy generally.
The company's broad definition of "misleading information" and its deference to authority invited censorship by proxy.
The Administration claims to want to end the policy. But, as Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell points out, it is actually expanding its use.
If lawmakers keep spending like they are, and if the Fed backs down from taming inflation, then the government may create a perfect storm.
While other pandemic policies have ended, the migration measure has “outlived [its] shelf life,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote yesterday.
The decision doesn't actually require continuation of the policy, but will have that effect indirectly. Justice Neil Gorsuch's dissent explains why the Court was wrong to take this step.
The legal distinction between the smoked and snorted forms of cocaine never made sense.
Plus: The editors extend the discussion on the lack of immigration reform in this week’s bill.
If political pressure to forgive debt can work once, why wouldn't it work again every five or 10 years?
In this Federalist Society podcast on a major immigration case currently before the Supreme Court, I go over the issues at stake, and make some tentative predictions about the case's likely outcome.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10