DOJ Retreats From Speech-Chilling Demand for Information About Trump's Opponents
Federal prosecutors say they did not realize how broad their warrant was.
Federal prosecutors say they did not realize how broad their warrant was.
If government censorship is the fear, then we must protect private free association.
First person convicted for insulting the new king
A bipartisan group of senators wants an investigation into the government's latest disastrous internet intervention.
A new paper in the Wake Forest Law Review explores "the virtues of unvirtuous spaces" when it comes to stopping sexual exploitation.
Here's a good reason to let private web companies, not government, decide who gets hosted.
AG Josh Hawley's "new evidence" against the U.S. company is actions carried out by foreign contractors for foreign websites.
You must submit your credit card number-for the safety of the children!
The Obama-era "Open Internet Order" discourages a free internet.
New study says men are more concerned about free speech and for women it's safety concerning the internet.
Our media consumption is increasingly personalized. But personalized does not mean isolated.
News organizations have become obsessed with fighting Donald Trump rather than covering him.
Not Canadian? Not in Canada? It doesn't matter, according to its supreme court.
Meet the developers behind Blockstack, who are using blockchain technology to reconfigure the web. It'll make NSA mass data collection impossible.
The justices say the law's "unprecedented" and "staggering" scope violates the First Amendment.
Using fear of terrorists to try to control what you can see online
Confusion over net neutrality rules has internet providers too scared to offer freebies, even though it's legal.
The bill was requested by the Department of Justice after federal prosecutors bungled a child exploitation case.
Glenn Platt of Miami University says technology is shrinking the distance between celebrity and audience, business and customer. Radical disruption ensues.
The FCC is designed to protect incumbents, enrich politicians, and screw consumers, says economist Thomas Hazlett.
A failure of transparency and responsibility by multiple nations.
Steroid users hustle to stay one rep ahead of the law.
Goodbye and good riddance to the Obama administration's "Open Internet Order."
No more gathering communications from Americans that were 'about' a foreign target.
"We were not living in a digital dystopia in the years leading up to 2015."
Good job, internet liberals, you got huge clothing conglomerate to stop selling one of its few works benefiting indie creators!
By nearly eliminating their equivalent of the Federal Communications Commission, Danes now enjoy some of the best IT and telecom services on earth.
A bill related to sex trafficking and Section 230 could have far-reaching consequences for web content, publishers, and apps.
Is it about privacy or about government censorship? Maybe that's a false choice.
92 percent of the most popular federal government websites just don't work as they should.
"This has become a crucially important channel of political communication," Justice Elena Kagan observes.
Or does power need to be more dispersed?
The 'Email Privacy Act' is back, but the Senate is still a barrier.
Watch Elizabeth Nolan Brown discuss the film with director Mary Mazzio, who aims to overhaul Backpage and federal law in the name of sex-trafficked teens.
Working on even stronger tech to protect from snooping.
As Congress puts Backpage on trial, Section 230 is the big fish in this barrel of red herrings.
Prohibitionists want the next attorney general to criminalize online betting by rewriting federal law.
"It's a sad day for America's children victimized by prostitution," said victims services advocate Lois Lee.
Don't scapegoat the right for this. You can spread the blame a lot more widely than that.
The area has previously prosecuted more than a dozen men in 2016 for online speech related to prostitution.
Secret snooping gets slightly less so.
"Congress has spoken on this matter and it is for Congress, not this Court, to revisit."
Social-media platforms have not so much "disrupted" the old media gatekeepers as they have introduced a watered-down version of the same concept.
Nestled deep in the Investigatory Powers Bill is the authority to mandate encryption "back doors."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks