The Failure to Stop Orlando Shooter Was Not a Surveillance Gap, So Reject Calls for More
We don't need a 'broader database.' And have we already forgotten about fusion centers?
We don't need a 'broader database.' And have we already forgotten about fusion centers?
The FBI thinks the constitutional right to privacy is a pain in the neck and they'd prefer to do without it.
The Democratic frontrunner is painted as stubborn, self-isolated, and unaccountable in IG's report.
An attempt to secretly expand what can be gathered with National Security Letters
The $4 trillion war on terror: Where did the money go?
More killed by accidents than criminals.
In 2008, Hillary Clinton invoked RFK's assassination as an "anything can happen" reason for not dropping out.
The FBI interrogated five of the former secretary of state's closest advisors, the same week it was reported that her private email server had been hacked.
'Shared Responsibility Committees' recruit neighbors to provide info-often with little training.
Clinton had characterized the FBI's investigation as "routine," but the DOJ now refers to it as a "law enforcement proceeding."
The USA Freedom Act provides cover for unconstitutional searches of citizens.
Fewer than .31 percent of law enforcement agencies are willing to make their use-of-force data public or share it with the federal government.
Agency wants to avoid a review process over passing information back to Apple.
The Shared Committees Responsibility program is surveillance masquerading as community service for Muslims.
The Shared Responsibility Committees program will force ordinary Muslims to spy on their own communities
The president characterizes his former secretary of state's use of a private email server as "careless," but under the law it's negligence.
The two switch sides in the request for access, but the underlying issues are the same.
The presumptive Democratic nominee faces a prudent legal but treacherous political decision.
The Senate is still interested in legislation that could weaken everybody's security.
The FBI says a mysterious "outside party" has found a way to unlock San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook's iPhone without assistance from Apple.
In the 11th hour, feds ask to delay court hearing over access to terrorist's work phone.
Larry Fly, the forgotten hero who refused to illegally wiretap Americans
Beware of hatchback doors in your cybersecurity.
Americans have the right to privacy and security of their digital data.
Both sides will be back in court next week.
The secretary of state turned 2016 presidential candidate is smart, shrewd, and experienced enough to recognize a state secret when she sees one.
Among other things, Apple alleges that the FBI violates its First Amendment rights by compelling company engineers to write code.
A murder of local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies would want their own backdoors too.
Big names in tech file briefs in support.
There's been a relentless barrage of bad legal news for Clinton lately.
Judiciary Committee members understand the precedent involved.
Federal officials can't keep their own secrets. Would you really trust them with the ability to access yours?
Says government has overstepped bounds
Rubio, Cruz accept claim that the encryption fight is over "just one phone."
The national security whistleblower talks to the Free State Project from an undisclosed location in Russia.
The DOJ has persuaded a judge to issue a search warrant for a thing that does not exist, by forcing Apple to create a key that the FBI is incapable of creating.
Company reveals formal opposition plan to demand they help weaken phone security.
Kennedy and Matt Welch defend Apple against the FBI
The talking points insist this Apple case is an isolated incident. Evidence suggests otherwise.
A handy guide for chatting anonymously online.
Which side are you on? Government spies or corporate guardians?
In addition to sex-worker arrests, 552 people "would-be sex buyers" were arrested for soliciting undercover cops, to the tune of at least $187,000 in fines.
What the FBI's war on the Maoist fringe tells us about the surveillance state
It's not not illegal.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks