The Fourth Amendment and the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
The USA Freedom Act provides cover for unconstitutional searches of citizens.
The USA Freedom Act provides cover for unconstitutional searches of citizens.
Fewer than .31 percent of law enforcement agencies are willing to make their use-of-force data public or share it with the federal government.
Agency wants to avoid a review process over passing information back to Apple.
The Shared Committees Responsibility program is surveillance masquerading as community service for Muslims.
The Shared Responsibility Committees program will force ordinary Muslims to spy on their own communities
The president characterizes his former secretary of state's use of a private email server as "careless," but under the law it's negligence.
The two switch sides in the request for access, but the underlying issues are the same.
The presumptive Democratic nominee faces a prudent legal but treacherous political decision.
The Senate is still interested in legislation that could weaken everybody's security.
The FBI says a mysterious "outside party" has found a way to unlock San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook's iPhone without assistance from Apple.
In the 11th hour, feds ask to delay court hearing over access to terrorist's work phone.
Larry Fly, the forgotten hero who refused to illegally wiretap Americans
Beware of hatchback doors in your cybersecurity.
Americans have the right to privacy and security of their digital data.
Both sides will be back in court next week.
The secretary of state turned 2016 presidential candidate is smart, shrewd, and experienced enough to recognize a state secret when she sees one.
Among other things, Apple alleges that the FBI violates its First Amendment rights by compelling company engineers to write code.
A murder of local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies would want their own backdoors too.
Big names in tech file briefs in support.
There's been a relentless barrage of bad legal news for Clinton lately.
Judiciary Committee members understand the precedent involved.
Federal officials can't keep their own secrets. Would you really trust them with the ability to access yours?
Says government has overstepped bounds
Rubio, Cruz accept claim that the encryption fight is over "just one phone."
The national security whistleblower talks to the Free State Project from an undisclosed location in Russia.
The DOJ has persuaded a judge to issue a search warrant for a thing that does not exist, by forcing Apple to create a key that the FBI is incapable of creating.
Company reveals formal opposition plan to demand they help weaken phone security.
Kennedy and Matt Welch defend Apple against the FBI
The talking points insist this Apple case is an isolated incident. Evidence suggests otherwise.
A handy guide for chatting anonymously online.
Which side are you on? Government spies or corporate guardians?
In addition to sex-worker arrests, 552 people "would-be sex buyers" were arrested for soliciting undercover cops, to the tune of at least $187,000 in fines.
What the FBI's war on the Maoist fringe tells us about the surveillance state
It's not not illegal.
The need for information about possible internal threats creates some predictably twisted incentives.
It seems that every week, more information comes to light about Clinton's grave legal woes.
The failure to safeguard state secrets is an area of the law in which the federal government has been aggressive to the point of being merciless.
Federal agents are more than happy to spend their time playing website whack-a-mole when there are assets to seize.
While we've been fixated on Trump, federal prosecutors continue to examine Clinton's tenure as secretary of state.
Did an Obama-administration policy prevent the feds from looking at Tashfeen Malik's social-media profiles? Yes and no.
Extremely inaccurate database to be replaced and revamped
From Mother Jones to the Mass Shooting Tracker: where activists and reporters get their stats
Gag order lifted in decades-old case fought by small Internet provider.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks