Body Camera Footage Helps Protect Good Cops

Example provided in Cleveland shooting


Check out this body camera footage from a police shooting in Cleveland. Not only do they refrain from immediately opening fire on an agitated man who actually shoots one of them, they give him plenty of opportunity to surrender afterward. Unfortunately he appears to have been insistent on committing suicide by cop and eventually got his wish:

The camera footage cuts off before showing the officers shooting Theodore Johnson, 64, to death, right after Johnson raised the gun he was holding. The body camera footage was released this week, but only after a grand jury had determined the four officers involved had been justified in the shooting.

In that sense, it's easy to see why the body camera footage has been released. While it's a reminder for cops that body camera footage can actually help them, there's still the matter that the same government officials who run this system of police accountability have a lot of influence over how much the public will get to see and when. If the shooting looked sketchy or much less obviously justified, and the grand jury had nevertheless declared it justified, would the prosecutor still have released it? Actually, they might have, given that authorities very quickly released the body camera footage when University of Cincinnati Police Officer Ray Tensing (who has been indicted for murder) shot and killed a man who tried to drive away from a traffic stop over a missing front license plate. But the larger point is still intact: Officials who are heavily involved in the cases themselves are also deciding what the public is allowed to see.

Gov. John Kasich (candidate for president, some may recall) has just put together an advisory board to develop standards for body camera use in Ohio. They will be including an examination of privacy issues and public records issues involved in the use of body cameras.

Elsewhere on the police shooting beat, the feds may actually be getting serious about getting more accurate (as in, even remotely accurate) numbers on the number of people killed by police officers in America each year. As Reason and other media outlets have previously noted, the FBI's stats on justified homicides by police are gathered through a voluntary program that has a significant non-participation rate. As a result the federal numbers the FBi puts out for police  homicides are missing somewhere around half of them.

So private media sources have stepped up to keep track of the deaths. Earlier this week FBI Director James Comey said he found the lack of reliable statistics on police shootings to be "embarrassing." From the Washington Post:

Speaking to a private gathering of more than 100 politicians and top law enforcement officials, Comey expressed frustration that the federal government has no better data on police shootings than databases assembled this year by The Washington Post and the Guardian newspaper.

"It is unacceptable that The Washington Post and the Guardian newspaper from the U.K. are becoming the lead source of information about violent encounters between police and civilians. That is not good for anybody," he said.

"You can get online today and figure out how many tickets were sold to 'The Martian,' which I saw this weekend. .?.?. The CDC can do the same with the flu," he continued. "It's ridiculous — it's embarrassing and ridiculous — that we can't talk about crime in the same way, especially in the high-stakes incidents when your officers have to use force."

The Department of Justice announced on Monday it will be creating its own database on deaths in police custody. How they're going to do so remains unclear at this point, but according to the Washington Post, one the possibilities is actually consulting those media created databases for more accurate figures and then requesting additional information from officials for each case. 

NEXT: Reason Weekly Contest: Help Augustus Sol Invictus Choose a Bumper Sticker

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I’m surprised the cops weren’t fired for violating rule number one: officer safety.

  2. The cops should be applauded for the amazing restraint they exhibited. However, I would criticize their methods from what I have seen and read. One major caveat, there may be other factors that I am not aware of since it is a sensational story and that aspect drowns out any other aspects. First from what I have read the guy was up in apartment alone. Second the land lady had to let them in. What if they just waited him out? There could very well be reasons they did not do this, but I have not seen any. The next cop may not be so lucky and the may aim higher. Great job by the cops involved, but maybe change some protocols even with this.

    1. Why were they there in the first place? Also, waiting someone out is not nearly as easy as it sounds. If the guy closes the curtains you can’t tell when he’s waiting by the door and when he’s in the backroom sleeping. The average person could easily last over a week before they needed to leave, unless you cut the water, and then you have the issue of cutting the water for a couple of days to an apartment complex full of people who have nothing to do with the crazy.

      1. The police have ways of figuring out where you are inside the apartment.

      2. from what I read, his wife went and got the cops because her husband had been drinking and was threatening herself and the landlady.

        My guess is waiting a drunk out would not take a week. there may have been other things that may have led them to take a much more confrontational approach, I certainly don’t know all the facts, but I doubt they feared a long drawn out siege

        1. A hostile drunk with a loaded gun in a city apartment is a pretty dangerous situation.

          If he was on a farm in the country, sure. Just make sure he doesn’t leave and see if he offed himself in the night.

  3. For once, a social drumbeat is resulting in something at least somewhat positive, unlike so many others of late.

    The problem is that the very people who become cops want the unaccountability for the most part, and that extends to the ability to pretty much do whatever the fuck they want on the job. Whether that’s sleeping in the squad car or shaking down store owners or abusing prisoners, they all like the ability to be unobserved (except by the peons, but they don’t count) while doing their thing. It’s one of the perks. Therefore many of them, probably a vast majority, will fight body cams tooth and nail, or at the very least seek to neuter them (i.e. they can turn them off whenever they feel like it).

    Remember, unless a body cam is absolutely mandatory (including being on at all times), then all it does is possibly nail really dumb cops who forget to turn it off when doing illegal things. Otherwise, it just allows smarter cops to leave it on when they know it will exonerate them and then turn it off when they know it won’t. It won’t stop any bad behavior.

    1. For once, a social drumbeat is resulting in something at least somewhat positive, unlike so many others of late.

      Don’t worry, Epi, the SJWs will find a way to fuck it up

  4. …given that authorities very quickly released the body camera footage when University of Cincinnati Police Officer Ray Tensing (who has been indicted for murder) shot and killed a man who tried to drive away from a traffic stop over a missing front license plate.

    That may have been total tone deafness of what actually constitutes a justified application of lethal force.

  5. Some sad shit here, but yeah, I think the cops did as much as they could.

  6. Good job, officers. That looks like the way it should be done.

  7. Can’t wait to hear… “Why didn’t they just shoot him in the arm?”

  8. Suicide by cop in my view.

  9. It does my heart good to see that looter politicians and their sumptuary laws have not yet succeeded in turning all cops into mindless murderers.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.