Saying 'I Make No Excuses' for Mishandling Classified Material, Clinton Offers New One
The Democratic nominee continues to minimize her email "mistake" at the State Department.
The Democratic nominee continues to minimize her email "mistake" at the State Department.
Here's why calling Donald Trump 'reckless' doesn't pack that much of a punch.
Dozens paid lots of money and got meetings.
How does this square with the candidate's stated foreign policies?
The transcript clearly shows otherwise.
The Democratic nominee's proxies argue that she was merely reckless with the facts.
James Comey confirmed that the Democratic nominee has repeatedly misled the public about her State Department emails.
James Comey says justice demands proof of criminal intent, even when the law doesn't.
Why did the FBI recommend against prosecuting her for gross negligence in handling classified material?
Newly revealed emails indicate the former secretary of state was concerned about more than just "convenience."
The Democratic frontrunner is painted as stubborn, self-isolated, and unaccountable in IG's report.
The email controversy recapitulates themes from Clinton's handling of health care reform.
A new law imposes an international stigma on people who pose no threat to public safety.
It seems that every week, more information comes to light about Clinton's grave legal woes.
The president is now in a big hurry after 7 years of delay
Environmentalists cry foul and urge President Obama to stop the pipeline
If You Like It (and Your Benefits) Then You Better Put a Ring on It.
How the Democratic presidential candidate kept an email controversy alive
Nearly 1,000 new emails to be handed over for investigation.
Some 33,000 emails Hillary Clinton thought she destroyed probably still could be recovered.
Her explanations remind one of Bill's word-splitting playbook.
Why does Hillary lie? Because she thinks she can get away with it. Will American voters let her?
Cody Wilson's legal team explains why the State Department should stop violating his-and our-First and Second Amendment rights over 3D printing files.
But only to the right countries, they promise!
A novel idea: Why not let the builders decide whether or not it is economic to construct?
Maybe it's better to stay home.
The identification of terrorism sponsors is driven by politics rather than facts.
Here comes Watergate, 21st-century style-except this time around, innocent people died.
Apparently, the government isn't good at designing sustainable social networks.
Not happy with the growing trend of diplomatic assignments as political rewards
Case where authorities referred to the journalist as a potential "conspirator"
It certainly will be coming up a lot should she run for president
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10