7 More Cases Everyone Should Know from the Rehnquist Court
Lopez, Seminole Tribe, Romer, Virginia, City of Boerne, Printz, Morrison
Lopez, Seminole Tribe, Romer, Virginia, City of Boerne, Printz, Morrison
Dole, Morrison, Johnson, Smith, New York, R.A.V., Casey, Church of the Lukumi
Congress takes up the issue of "acquitted conduct."
Roe, Frontiero, Buckley, Craig, Bakke, Penn Central, and Cleburne
Brown, Bolling, Lee Optical, Cooper, Sherbert, Sullivan, Heart of Atlanta, McClung, Griswold, Loving, and O'Brien
Wickard, Korematsu, and Youngstown
Qualified immunity protects cops from liability for actions that would land ordinary people in jail.
O'Gorman, Stromberg., Nebbia, Schechter Poultry, West Coast Hotel, Jones & Laughlin Steel, Carolene Products, Darby
Buchanan, Hammer, Schenck, Debs, Abrams, Penn. Coal, Adkins, Meyer, Pierce, Gitlow, and Buck
Cruikshank, Strauder, Civil Rights Cases, Yick Wo, Hans, E.C. Knight, Plessy, Champion, Lochner, and Muller
Putting up with some drag-queen storytelling seems like a small price to pay to live in a relatively free society.
Prigg, Dred Scott, Merryman, Dewitt, Hepburn, Knox, Slaughter-House, and Bradwell
Chisholm, Marbury, McCulloch, Gibbons, and Barron
An Interactive Web Site To Explore the 100 Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know
This book and video series teaches the narrative of constitutional law as it has developed over the past two centuries.
The Democratic presidential field is not interested in your puny restraints on the executive branch.
Hopefully the White House can refrain from creating any new constitutional conundrums for a semester.
Going beyond criticism, the resolution would punish the NRA and its supporters by cutting off contractors with ties to the group.
Plus: millennials are buying homes after all, protecting Pinterest from anti-vaxxers, and more...
Conservatives who argue that the video platform is constrained by the First Amendment are forsaking their constitutional principles.
Nick Tomboulides of U.S. Term Limits says the best way to shrink government is to limit how long legislators can serve.
As part of its ambitious “1619” inquiry into the legacy of slavery, The New York Times revives false 19th century revisionist history about the American founding.
The five Democrats warn that the Court may have to be "restructured" if it keeps making decisions they don't like.
The justices would be abdicating their duty to uphold the Constitution if they let such political considerations decide legal issues.
The Democracy for All Amendment aims to mute some voices so that others can be heard.
Plus: Marijuana banking, suing Facebook, and more...
Plus: Behind the bipartisan war on internet speech, New York "decriminalizes" pot (but you'll still get fined), and more...
His border lawlessness keeps growing
The late Supreme Court justice was an inconsistent defender of civil liberties.
An admirable man with a distinguished career as a Supreme Court justice. But also the author of some of the more problematic opinions of his era.
An amendment to this year's military spending bill says the president must go to Congress before launching another war.
Aggressive asset forfeiture collides with First Amendment rights.
It's an unconventional approach befitting of an unconventional presidential candidate.
Severability doctrine & the ACA findings seem to support Judge O'Connor's ruling
An important element of standing has already been decided by the Court
Understanding NFIB v. Sebelius
The Supreme Court has used this doctrine for many years, including in the recent gerrymandering decision. But it still doesn't actually make any sense.
Despite occasional rhetoric to the contrary, neither conservative nor liberal justices are shy about overruling constitutional precedent they believe to be badly misguided. And that's a good thing.
“Our role is to enforce the Takings Clause as written.”
The Trump appointee is not impressed by the logic of the "dual sovereignty" doctrine: "Really?"
Constitutional law is made by a politically constructed institution
Jamelle Bouie's counterintuitive recommendation would effectively eliminate constitutional limits on elected officials, including Trump and every demagogue who follows him.
An awful lot, but who's counting?
More often than you might think
Depends on who you ask.
A new history of how the U,.S. Supreme Court has defined and enforced the limits of congressional power
From today's opinion by Justice Thomas, for the five more conservative members of the Court, in Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks