Scalia v. Epstein - 35 Years Later
Revisiting their debate on judicial protection of economic liberty.
Revisiting their debate on judicial protection of economic liberty.
Q&A with the co-founder of Institute for Justice about immigration, his legal philosophy, his battles with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and that tattoo.
Plus: Can sex workers ever trust Kamala Harris? Why do teens love Google Docs? And how is Tumblr faring without porn?
The nation's force mustered in service of the nation's will.
An essential distinction for understanding problems vexing the constitutional order
The alternatives suggested by defenders of the monument do not seem much better.
The challenge to a World War I memorial in Maryland illustrates the confusion caused by the Supreme Court's Establishment Clause cases.
It's an attempt to make an end-run around congressional spending authority.
Plus: Silicon Valley is suspicious of media, Cory Booker calls for weed reform, and how to understand the "upper middle class"
Plus: A judge says Jeffrey Epstein case was mishandled, and Andrea Dworkin is making a comeback.
Sex, publishing, and quasi-legal theft collide in the Backpage prosecution.
Congress seems to have authorized this end run around its spending power. Can it do that?
Bargaining over policy is supposed to be frustrating. That's a feature, not a bug, of limited government.
My latest article on James Madison and constitutional practice, with some criticisms and related links
As the lawsuit against FOSTA hits appeals court, three essays about the law that everyone should read.
In a 5-4 decision, the Court issued a temporary stay of a Louisiana law that could put abortion doctors out of business.
Gun buyers, gay lovers, cannabis customers, and Yelp users are just a few of the groups that benefit from this federal law.
William Barr does not like legalization but says Congress has to resolve the "untenable" conflict between state and federal law.
Compelled use of facial and finger recognition features runs afoul of the Fifth Amendment.
Only if you like the cause they serve, according to supporters of laws that target the anti-Israel BDS movement
A ballot initiative that took effect this week bans sales to adults younger than 21.
Two brothers were arrested at a Giants-49ers game after cursing out and flipping off the Giants players. Now they're suing.
A federal lawsuit says the state is violating the Second Amendment by refusing to recognize the restoration of firearm rights by courts in other states.
Cops supposedly smelled 25 grams of pot inside a plastic container inside a safe inside a closet 30 feet from a guy's doorstep.
In a case SCOTUS will hear next month, victims of Tennessee's protectionism argue that it flouts the 14th Amendment as well as the Commerce Clause.
A federal court has struck down a New York ban inspired by kung fu movies.
The Supreme Court seems disinclined to overturn precedents allowing serial prosecutions of the same crime.
A 3rd Circuit judge says the decision approving New Jersey's 10-round limit treats the right to arms less seriously than other constitutional rights.
The Supreme Court should reconsider the misbegotten "dual sovereignty" doctrine.
The Supreme Court should make it clear that state forfeitures are constrained by the Excessive Fines Clause.
A federal judge overturns a state ban on telling customers they can bring their own beer or wine.
Constitutional law could be improved by taking account of the principle that "with great power, comes great responsibility."
Legal scholar Eric Segall argues originalism doesn't qualify as a constitutional theory because originalists disagree on too many things. His case is overstated. But if it's correct, the same criticism applies to living constitutionalism.
Why first principles suggest that Matthew Whitaker's acting appointment is invalid, but precedent and practice might suggest the opposite.
Living constitutionalists argue that their methodology allows us to improve constitutional law over time. But what if it actually makes it worse? Legal scholar Ernest Young raises that very question in an important new article.
On Tuesday, voters in six states approved Crime Victims' Rights Amendments, continuing a long-term trend towards expanding the crime victim's role in the criminal justice process
Banning ballot selfies to stop voter fraud is like "burning down the house to roast the pig" said the First Circuit Court of Appeals. But many states still do it.
President Trump's hardline immigration stances have made for some polarizing debates.
The federal case against the Pittsburgh shooter is redundant and constitutionally questionable.
At least one Republican congressman agrees.
Plus: Southern border will see more troops than Iraq, Syria.
First thoughts on Jonathan Gienapp's The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era
Progressives appreciate the separation of powers-up to a point.
Responses to my lead essay by legal scholars John Eastman and Gabriel Chin have now been posted, along with my rejoinders to them.
The 13th Amendment outlaws slavery, but not for prison inmates.
Plus: The Justice Department goes after "net neutrality" in California and SNL takes on Brett Kavanaugh.
Rosenstein was not happy with how Trump handled the James Comey firing.
The U.S. Constitution was signed on this day 231 years ago.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10