Utah Law Gives Parents Full Access to Teens' Social Media
Plus: Theatrics at the House hearing on TikTok, doomsday merger predictions haven't panned out, and more...
Plus: Theatrics at the House hearing on TikTok, doomsday merger predictions haven't panned out, and more...
It would result in shortages, decreases in productivity, and higher production costs affecting millions of American workers and nearly every consumer.
Federal, state, and local officials will always threaten to weaponize the state against private actors they don't like. The "Kia Challenge" provides the latest example.
The legal challenge to censorship by proxy highlights covert government manipulation of online speech.
Plus: A listener asks the editors if the nation is indeed unraveling or if she is just one of "The Olds" now.
The latest Twitter Files shows a partnership between Stanford University researchers and government-funded organizations encouraged social media companies to police true information.
Momfluenced bemoans unrealistic expectations set on American mothers but then establishes new ones.
The bill is overbroad and could have unintended consequences.
Online communities have made their diagnoses their identity.
While the FDA keeps experimental treatments out of reach, the spoonie world makes a diagnosis into an identity.
Plus: The editors recommend the best books for sparking interest in free market principles.
Turning every streaming service into TikTok is bad for the internet. It'll be disastrous for music.
Members of Congress showed their true colors at a Thursday hearing.
The trade association says the overbroad and vague A.B. 2273 places unconstitutional burdens on speech.
Plus: U.S. special forces seeks “next generation” deepfake tech, the economic cost of the PRO Act, and more…
Plus: The editors puzzle over Donald Trump’s latest list describing his vision for America.
A new 60-minute screen time warning on TikTok won’t stop kids from scrolling.
The latest bid to amend Section 230 would threaten free speech and creators' ability to monetize content while also subjecting tech companies to a flood of frivolous lawsuits.
In Meme Wars, so-called "disinformation" experts call for the suppression of more ideas and speakers to protect democracy.
A senator, a state attorney general, and a former congressman excoriated the law while getting much of it wrong.
The push to label the lab leak thesis a racist conspiracy theory now looks even more foolish.
The Court’s decisions in Gonzalez and subsequent cases could lead to impossible, incompatible consequences.
When society criminalizes outdoor independence, it makes smart phone addiction more likely.
Plus: The U.S. Supreme Court considers another internet free speech case, the Department of Transportation pushes expensive new rail regs, and more...
The Supreme Court’s newest member weighs in on the meaning of Section 230 in Gonzalez v. Google.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion of the decentralized protocol Nostr with NVK, Damus app creator Will Casarin, Nick Gillespie, and Zach Weissmueller.
The social media site slapped a warning on a column in which I criticized the CDC for exaggerating the evidence supporting mask mandates.
Section 230 helped the internet flourish. Now its scope is under scrutiny.
Plus: Did the Pentagon shoot down a hobby radio balloon?, Kentucky abortion ban can be enforced, and more...
"Today's decision is a victory for the First Amendment that should be celebrated by everyone who hopes to see the internet continue as a place where even difficult and contentious issues can be debated and discussed freely," said one attorney.
When COVID-19 and the U.S. government stopped kids from seeing each other, social media was their lifeline.
Gonzalez v. Google presents the Supreme Court’s first opportunity to weigh in on Section 230.
The "interactive artist" inspired by Jack Kirby and Barry Goldwater challenges social media and intellectual conformity.
Plus: New York "hate speech" law is likely unconstitutional, FTC Commissioner quits because of chair Lina Khan's antics, and more...
A government-supported organization's controversial ratings of online news sources illustrate the challenge of deciding what qualifies as disinformation.
Artist Dave Cicirelli challenges his audience to create meaning.
Plus: Government regulation of speech is on trial, biohackers flock to experimental charter city in Honduras, and more…
Because of a series of misleading memes, a troll has been charged with conspiracy "to injure, oppress, threaten and intimidate one or more persons in the free exercise and enjoyment of a right and privilege secured to them by the Constitution and laws of the United States."
The paper is unfazed by First Amendment objections to the Biden administration's crusade against "misinformation" on social media.
Instead of empowering the government to intervene, we should look more holistically at the experience of young people online.
Congress should set its sights on bad government actors who pressured social media companies.
The FTC is trying to seize new powers to regulate the economy.
Plus: Bill would make all social media platforms check IDs, appeals court rejects rent control challenge, and more...
The age verification proposal is a disaster for both children and adults.
Plus: Trump teases new avenues of authoritarianism, interest rates raised again, and more...
In the Twitter Files, every conversation with a government official contains the same warning: You can do it happily, or we’ll make you.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10