YouTube Has the Right To Shut Down Rand Paul. That Doesn't Mean It Should.
Big tech platforms should encourage debate, not forbid it.
Big tech platforms should encourage debate, not forbid it.
A rational debate requires acknowledging both the strengths and the weaknesses of the scientific evidence.
Plus: Biden won't budge on Afghanistan, the link between cruise ship vaccine passports and free speech, and more...
Whether or not YouTube should have suspended him, the senator overlooked the limitations of the studies he cited and ignored countervailing research.
Online censorship by proxy undermines the ordinary process for checking claims and counterclaims.
Plus: Congress' gift to Big Tech companies, infrastructure bill costs, and more...
Market power does not make a private company the equivalent of a government agency.
Plus: Whistleblower on drone killings sentenced to federal prison, Biden carries on Trump's legacy on trade and immigration, and more...
Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube will expand their use of a central database that compiles extremist content for coordinated de-platforming.
Plus: A possible breakthrough in cheap battery technology, a primer on inflation, the SCOTUS showdown over abortion, and more....
The administration’s public pressure campaign against COVID-19 "misinformation" cannot be reconciled with its avowed respect for freedom of expression.
Also, regulation is (still) not the answer to online misinformation.
The existence of politically biased websites is not a crisis.
Speech is protected by the First Amendment even when it discourages vaccination.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki wants the social media site to ban 12 specific anti-vaccine accounts.
Demonstrators are making themselves heard via Facebook, Signal, and other platforms. Is that enough to overthrow an authoritarian regime?
The controversial author on her acclaimed and condemned book, being deplatformed, and the future of free expression in an increasingly polarized marketplace of ideas
The rationales for doing so are weak, and would create a dangerous slippery slope, if accepted.
It will fail, and fail badly.
Efforts against violence are turning into restrictions on ideas.
Plus: How Trump lost in 2020, Amazon seeks recusal of FTC chair, and more...
Plus: Retaliatory action in Syria, developments with the delta variant, Clarence Thomas on marijuana, and more...
Taken together, these six measures would have a major impact on the way we shop, chat, and otherwise go about our business online.
In many professional arenas, Wu's swings and misses would have consequences. In Wu's case, it landed him an advisory role in the Biden administration.
Our coverage of biohackers working on a DIY vaccine last year was solid reporting on an important subject. If YouTube insists on banning journalism like this, what's next?
People fret about online echo chambers, but offline echo chambers can be just as strong—or stronger.
"I chose to be that guy who didn't issue the apology," says Daniel Elder. "Things went from there and it wasn't good."
The law would make a federal case out of every aggrieved internet user and compel companies to host messages they do not wish to platform.
Jones has been accused of fabricating her COVID-19 cover-up claims. Now she says she's running for Congress.
I don't know the correct level of content moderation by Facebook, Twitter, Google, or Amazon, and neither do you.
How reactionary politicians are using monopoly concerns as cover to pursue pre-existing political agendas
A new article's authors thanked Twitter for calling out their problematic microaggressions.
The creator of ultra-woke poet Titania McGrath makes the case against cancel culture.
Plus: Prosecutors are big lobbyists for new crime bills, Biden floats compromise on corporate taxes, and more...
The creator of Titania McGrath on cancel culture, government overreach, and younger generations' willingness to censor
“The Act is so rife with fundamental infirmities that it appears to have been enacted without any regard for the Constitution,” the lawsuit reads.
We expect British royals to favor muzzling commoners, but too many lawmakers feel the same way.
Calling a classmate a racist slur on Snapchat is offensive. It’s also protected speech.
It's a working model for non-state governance in cyberspace that is vastly preferable to government control of social media.
A member of the board (and a Cato Institute vice president) defends the controversial decision to kick the former president off the social media platform.
Facebook can't kill, jail, or tax you. It can only stop you from posting on Facebook.
"It's very obvious that nobody involved in [the bill] consulted a First Amendment lawyer," says TechFreedom's Berin Szóka.
"At the time of Mr. Trump's posts, there was a clear, immediate risk of harm."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10