The FTC Fails To Prove Facebook Is a Monopoly
Plus: Retaliatory action in Syria, developments with the delta variant, Clarence Thomas on marijuana, and more...
Plus: Retaliatory action in Syria, developments with the delta variant, Clarence Thomas on marijuana, and more...
Taken together, these six measures would have a major impact on the way we shop, chat, and otherwise go about our business online.
In many professional arenas, Wu's swings and misses would have consequences. In Wu's case, it landed him an advisory role in the Biden administration.
Plus: Biden to back bill ending crack/cocaine sentencing disparity, the truth about tech startup creation, and more...
"The NCAA is not above the law," wrote Justice Brett Kavanaugh in a fiery concurring opinion.
The unanimous ruling could pave the way for greatly expanded compensation for college athletes.
"Hospitals cannot agree to cap nurses' income in order to create a 'purer' form of helping the sick. News organizations cannot join forces to curtail pay to reporters to preserve a 'tradition' of public-minded journalism."
Plus: How Facebook killed blogging, the trouble with so-called common good originalism, and more...
How reactionary politicians are using monopoly concerns as cover to pursue pre-existing political agendas
Plus: Supreme Court to rule on Catholic foster agencies, tech associations sue over social media law in Florida, and more…
A new antitrust suit targets third-party seller agreements.
A member of the board (and a Cato Institute vice president) defends the controversial decision to kick the former president off the social media platform.
"It's very obvious that nobody involved in [the bill] consulted a First Amendment lawyer," says TechFreedom's Berin Szóka.
By invoking the magic of good intentions, the Times justifies the U.S. acting like Russia and China.
Hawley’s legislation would give officials more room to unilaterally punish business behaviors they personally don’t like.
This tech/media fight down under is not about democracy or monopolies. It’s about ad revenue.
Online companies might not be as nefarious as you think.
Some trends to look for over the next four years
Amazon denies any impropriety in its decision to suspend the Twitter alternative, dismissing the suit as "meritless."
After a 16-month investigation into the big four tech companies, it seems the most that congressional busybodies can accuse them of is routine business practices and having popular services.
Plus: Google gets hit with another antitrust lawsuit, the U.S. falls in a new ranking of human freedom, and more...
If the lawsuit were to succeed, it would hurt the people it seeks to help.
The Supreme Court has decided to hear a case challenging the legality of NCAA rules restricting compensation for college athletes. Legal issues aside, the policy case for abolishing these rules is strong.
Plus: Sexual misconduct at the FBI, Tulsi Gabbard and Mike Lee don't understand the First Amendment, and more...
Republicans and Democrats are working together on an antitrust push against big tech. It will backfire big-time.
It's hard to take seriously complaints that there are no alternatives to Facebook when they're made on Twitter.
The government is going after Google not to stop consumer harm but to level the business playing field.
Government claims Google uses its power to force users and advertisers on board. Google says that its popularity is not anticompetitive.
Enforcement is supposed to be about protecting "consumer welfare." Overturning that goal would be bad for all of us.
Plus: Tech companies respond, proposed H-1B visa changes, and more...
Plus: Good news on COVID-19 immunity, court nixes California ammunition ban, and more...
This isn't a debate about consumer needs. It's all about political control.
Plus: Trump suggests election delay, and more...
The scary monopoly power on display Wednesday was the federal government's.
"I think you might be referring to what happened on Twitter."
The lawmaker says that the company's data practices violate antitrust law. They do not.
Law professors Tim Wu and Richard Epstein went head to head at a live event.
Tim Wu vs. Richard Epstein on whether antitrust laws should be applied to firms like Amazon and Facebook.
It's time to stop trying to cartelize the market for law clerks
Henry Hazlitt's insights were far more sophisticated than one modern critic thinks.
Amazon, Google, Facebook, and Twitter are in the federal government's crosshairs, but the technology necessary to undermine their dominance may already exist.
Everybody’s going after Google and Facebook. But how do you prove they’re harming consumers?
Left and right are joining forces under the banner of “hipster antitrust.”
Donald Trump, Elizabeth Warren, and "hipster antitrust" scholars and activists say big tech companies need to be broken up. Economist Tom Hazlett says they're wrong.
Apple, Google, Amazon, and Facebook are all in the federal government’s crosshairs.
Both Democrats and Republicans are cheerleading for government action against Facebook, Google, Amazon, and the rest, but Americans should be skeptical.
Plus: Everything you need to know about the latest Scarlett Johansson controversy, new 2020 fundraising and polling numbers, and warnings about "meth-gators"
Bill de Blasio: "We are supposed to break up big corporations when they're not serving our democracy."
(You don't really have to shut up, but here's my money.)
Yes, I'll donate to Reason right now! I'll keep my money today, thanksReason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksHelp Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksReason is the antidote to the same old stale take on ideas that actually matter to me.
I’ll support Free Minds and Free Markets! Not interestedReason pushes me to think critically with facts and analysis that shape my perspective and amplify the ideas I care about.
I want to make a donation so that my voice can be heard! Not todayEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedIt’s hard to trust the media these days, especially when everyone is pushing a partisan agenda. Reason stands for my right to make my own choices.
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No, I’ll follow the partisan herdReason’s fearless, principled journalism keeps me sane in a crazy world.
Making a donation to Reason right now will keep me from losing my mind! No, I like being madSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksSupport the voices that advocate for your freedom. Donate to Reason today!
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today