Justice Department Takes Aim at Judge Cannon
In its latest filing, the Department of Justice seeks to put an end to Judge Cannon's interference with the federal government's investigation documents kept at Mar-a-Lago.
In its latest filing, the Department of Justice seeks to put an end to Judge Cannon's interference with the federal government's investigation documents kept at Mar-a-Lago.
The Court's newest justice was an extremely active questioner during the Supreme Court's October arguments.
An unsurprising development in the former President's latest legal doings.
As the election approaches, the President sharpens his criticism of the Supreme Court.
An appellate panel thoroughly dismantles Judge Cannon's order blocking Department of Justice access to documents President Trump kept at Mar-a-Lago.
Based upon Totenberg's new book, a prominent legal ethicist thinks the conflict was a real one.
A judge sided with a plaintiff who objects to procuring coverage for HIV-prevention medications. Rightly so.
The president claims broad authority to act under a post-9/11 law.
The case shows the power given to judges when parental consent or notification is required for a minor's abortion.
Justice Breyer consistently resisted conservative efforts to constrain federal power, so his opinion in Torres is a fitting swan song.
The Supreme Court announces when Judge Jackson will become Justice Jackson.
There are only two argued cases left for decision -- the last two to be decided with Justice Breyer on the Court.
A New York Times piece on conservative legal challenges to climate regulations characterizes the balance of the D.C. Circuit in a most unusual way.
In remarks to the American Constitution Society, Justice Sonia Sotomayor shares her thoughts on the senior-most Associate Justice.
Chief Justice Roberts refuses to join a wee little footnote in a Justice Barrett opinion.
Justice Gorsuch has dissented from two-thirds of Justice Barrett's majority opinions this term.
Perhaps the real question is whether such a school is a state actor for purposes of Section 1983. The en banc Fourth Circuit says it is, so that a skirt requirement for girls is unlawful.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch are disagreeing more than you might think, but Justice Barrett appears to have the upper hand.
The justices hear fewer cases and decide fewer questions than they used to.
We will get opinions on Monday, but the Court will have to average more than two opinions per day to finish before July 4.
The judicial conference endorses making PACER searches free for non-commercial users.
Newly confirmed Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has a good track record on cases involving qualified immunity.
There is much, much less in the leaked draft than meets the eye
A newly released memo from the Office of Legal Counsel suggests the answer is "yes."
“I believe that the Constitution is fixed in its meaning,” said the Supreme Court nominee.
The SCOTUS contender should discuss her views on congressional power, unenumerated rights, and qualified immunity.
Does her position on Harvard University's Board of Overseers require or counsel her recusal once she is confirmed?
An interesting concurrence to one of today's Supreme Court decisions.
The SCOTUS pick has shown admirable judgment in criminal justice cases.
There are more productive things to argue about than identify politics.
Breyer’s deference to law enforcement often led him to sell the Fourth Amendment short.
Without judicial review, liberals confronting a Republican-controlled legislature will have no opportunity to seek constitutional redress in federal court.
The Biden Administration is off to a fast start nominating and appointing federal judges, but will this continue?
“All of those…just come out of Lochner.”
The oft-heard argument that something isn't "written in the Constitution" is not as compelling as it might seem. Sometimes, it's outright false.
Demand Justice's Balls and Strikes provides more heat than light.
A Wall Street Journal report shows that federal judges do not always recuse when cases implicate their financial holdings.
“The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized the authority of the United States...to seek equitable relief to vindicate various federal interests and constitutional guarantees.”
The Justice continues his media book tour without commenting on his potential retirement.
An interesting exploration of what happens when high courts are evenly divided.
In his new book, the 83-year-old justice warns court-packing advocates to “think long and hard before embodying those changes in law.”
Biden’s Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court seems to favor judicial term limits.
The fight over qualified immunity divides "conservative" judges on the 5th Circuit.
"Redress for a federal officer's unconstitutional acts is either extremely limited or wholly nonexistent."
Plus: Biden to back bill ending crack/cocaine sentencing disparity, the truth about tech startup creation, and more...
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks