Thoughts on the Potential Broader Significance of the Supreme Court's Tariff Decision
Only time will tell how great the impact of the ruling will really be. But, at this point, it seems like a very significant decision.
Only time will tell how great the impact of the ruling will really be. But, at this point, it seems like a very significant decision.
Plus: Entitlement reform, gas prices, the Reason SOTU drinking game, robo-vac spies, and more...
A drop in seizures doesn't necessarily mean a decline in the supply.
And that's especially true if the tariffs are illegal.
The plan recognizes that public opinion is what's holding data centers back the most.
The president can't just bring prices down with the stroke of his pen, no matter what he claimed in his State of the Union speech.
The Trump administration signals an intent to continue appealing to the mainstream, not the far right, on IVF.
President Donald Trump tossed out a bunch of economic statistics during his State of the Union address. Here are three that are just plain wrong.
Large investors are a small, beneficial presence in the single-family home market.
The article explains why the new Section 122 tariffs are illegal, and courts should strike them down, when (as is likely) lawsuits are filed against them.
Those expecting fireworks at tonight's State of the Union will have to sit through the tedious resume-padding of a flagging president.
The conservative justice’s regrettable opinion in Learning Resources v. Trump.
The president is relying on a provision that the government's lawyers said had no "obvious application" to his goal of reducing the trade deficit.
The president neither understands nor appreciates the vital role of judicial independence in upholding the rule of law.
President Trump will undoubtedly keep trying to impose protectionism, but his options are limited.
The prominent conservative legal commentator outlines the case against Trump's latest tariff power grab.
It covers many issues raised by the decision.
Thanks to our victory in the tariff case before the Supreme Court, businesses that paid billions of dollars in illegally collected tariffs can seek refunds. But the process may be difficult.
The new tariff will be implemented under a 1974 law that gives the president authority to impose tariffs for up to 150 days.
"will appreciate the legislative process for the bulwark of liberty it is."
There are many laws that explicitly authorize the president to impose taxes on imports, but they include limits that Trump was keen to avoid.
"There is no exception to the major questions doctrine for emergency statutes," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts.
In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize tariffs.
So now it’s radical to be against Biden-era merger notification requirements?
An encounter on the campaign trail. Was it a dead end, or a wasted opportunity?
The story is an exercise in pettiness but also a perfect reason why Congress and the Supreme Court should limit the president's power grab.
Plus: Speaker of the House Mike Johnson embraces warrantless ICE searches, the Super Bowl halftime culture war, and Trump continues funding the Department of Education
Trump's call to "nationalize elections" leads prominent election law scholar Rick Hasen to reverse his longstanding support for such a policy.
Trump's endorsements of Viktor Orbán and Sanae Takaichi, like Clinton's support for Boris Yeltsin or Obama's opposition to Benjamin Netanyahu, do not make America great.
The Trump administration excludes advanced nuclear power reactors from excessive National Environmental Policy Act requirements.
Federal authorities should not be able to turn civil commitment into a life sentence for anyone the government deems inconvenient.
Limited government means those in power can do limited damage to the rest of us.
The president's order is not the comprehensive ban on large investor–owned housing that he promised. But it could still have a chilling effect on the single-family rental market.
Homan is a bully with little regard for rights or the rule of law. And the problems with Trump's immigration tactics point back to the White House itself.
Trump’s legal arguments “would weaken, if not shatter, the independence of the Federal Reserve,” the justice said.
A House rule prohibiting tariff resolutions from coming to the floor will expire at the end of the month and is unlikely to be renewed.
The antiquated statute arguably allows the president to deploy the military in response to nearly any form of domestic disorder.
Politically-motivated firings and increased executive branch scrutiny set “a dangerous precedent,” warns a former archivist of the United States.
Vice President J.D. Vance on the nature of power
Former U.S. Archivist Colleen Shogan discusses the importance of preserving presidential records and the challenge of maintaining public trust in an era of partisan conflict.
No one likes high interest rates on credit cards and loans, but artificially lowering interest rates via executive power is not a solution.
Presidential non-acquiescence in Humphrey's Executor from 1989 to 2009.
Humphrey's Executor from 1969 to 1989.
Almost every president since 1945 has refused to accept Humphrey's Executor as having been correctly decided.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt did his best to defend presidential removal power at will notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s lawless decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.