The 1986 Plastic Gun Panic
How the gun control lobbies nearly tricked Congress into banning millions of ordinary guns.
How the gun control lobbies nearly tricked Congress into banning millions of ordinary guns.
The same happened to the case against the Chicago Tribune, in which the judge orally ordered the Tribune to take down a post that contained the picture (though the written order failed to reflect that).
"Free speech and free expression have simply never existed in China or in its artist communities."
No, says the Fifth Circuit, striking down as unconstitutionally overbroad a Louisiana statute that apparently bans threatening public employees with lawsuits or complaints -- and not just with violence -- "with the intent to influence [the employee's official] conduct."
No one will miss Infowars, but that's beside the point.
Officials trying to stop people from sharing information online are still raging against Napster.
Facebook, YouTube, Spotify, and Apple accuse him of violating their platforms' speech codes.
Many state constitutions require the government to pay compensation when it acts in ways that "damage" private property. An important new article by legal scholar Maureen Brady reveals the previously ignored history of these provisions, and the lessons that can be learned from it.
The podcast crew takes on the The New York Times' controversial new hire, Trump's trade war escalations, Medicare-for-all, and 3D-printed guns.
It's not a crime to travel with lots of cash. But you still might be treated like a criminal.
Prospective tour guides won't have to cough up nearly $100 and study for weeks to talk about their city anymore.
There is no First Amendment exception for "hate speech," and the government can't specially target racist or religiously bigoted speech -- but some Connecticut prosecutors seem not to know that.
As often happens, news reports misunderstand what "stand your ground" laws mean.
Most federal circuit courts have held that people generally have a right to record what police officers do in public places. But how far does that extend?
What a deleted tweet says about the direction of a civil liberties organization.
They should tread carefully before scrapping reproductive rights now that the possibility of overturning Roe v. Wade is real
When Americans do it, it's called participating in democracy. When Russians do it, it's called undermining democracy.
Air marshals have snooped on about 5,000 of us since March-and not because they suspected any of those people of specific crimes.
Sean Thomas Banks assured the family he was taking them for "safekeeping."
The "right to be forgotten" sneaking into American courts? Google has not complied with the court order -- and the plaintiff is now trying to get it held in contempt of court.
It's never been illegal to make your own firearms.
Did the settlement with the distributor of home gun-making hardware and software remove computer files from the United States Munitions List or just temporarily stop treating them as affected munitions?
Three ways of thinking about the problem: 1. Software is like hardware. 2. Software is like instruction manuals. 3. Alexa, read this book and make me a gun.
Call out hypocrisy, but don't join the lynch mob.
David Cole defends the First Amendment's viewpoint neutrality, obliquely rebutting critics who question his group's commitment to it.
They are years away (if ever) from becoming the choice of bad guys, who can already make untraceable weapons, so why all the fear-mongering?
The platform is struggling to handle contradictory laws about legal and illegal use of pot
White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders touts President Trump's support for printed gun bans.
But thanks to the internet, it may not matter.
A new ruling says the city's civil forfeiture program violates the right to due process.
The government's decision to settle a lawsuit with Defense Distributed doesn't change anything significant. It's not Trump's fault. And the underlying case was as much about free speech as it was about guns.
If you were planning to attend an anti-right rally in D.C. next week, we've got some awkward news for you.
...after months of complaining that social media companies censor too much.
An officer with the Aurora Police Department is on paid leave after confusing an armed homeowner with the intruder he shot and killed.
Critics say the "red flag" law is violating Floridians' constitutional rights.
The states allege that the Feds decision to settle its lawsuit with Defense Distributed violates administrative procedure law and the states' 10th Amendment rights.
Police generally need to investigate matters further, to see if the post was really a threat or sarcasm -- and if they don't investigate further, and don't have a good reason for the immediate arrest, they can be sued for a Fourth Amendment violation, and be denied qualified immunity.
It is both philosophically and strategically wrong.
Compelled Subsidies and the First Amendment -- a new article with co-blogger Eugene Volokh, forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review
The authorities threatened the gun-making software and hardware company. Now the company is striking back, citing its First and Second Amendment rights.
The previously prohibited computer files related to making guns at home are now legally available in resolution of long-standing lawsuit involving Cody Wilson and Defense Distributed.
Domestic surveillance in Tennessee.
The Borat comedian's new "Kinder Guardian" videos put lawmakers in cringe-worthy light.
A follow-up to the May federal court decision holding that the school district's actions violated the First Amendment.
If social media feels like a cesspool, don't go swimming.
Yet the order (narrowed on appeal to 50 feet, but still unconstitutional) seems to have been based on pretty normal -- if acrimonious -- local political debate. We're asking the Ohio Supreme Court to review the decision upholding it.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks