E-Verify: Making Life Harder for Workers and Small Businesses, With Enthusiastic MAGA Support
E-Verify makes life harder on immigrants who want to work, but it doesn't make things better for anyone—-even those who want to see those immigrants leave.
E-Verify makes life harder on immigrants who want to work, but it doesn't make things better for anyone—-even those who want to see those immigrants leave.
No, Californians aren't banned from showering and doing laundry on the same day. But the fact that so many people believed that lie says something about how insane the state's real water laws are.
A bipartisan coalition wants to restrain secret snooping and create more independent oversight of the secretive FISA Court.
Following an insider trading conviction and the collapse of his career, Damilare Sonoiki is suing Harvard.
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is filing a defamation suit against Hillary Clinton
"I don't think you should do Twitter if you think you're better than Twitter."
The lawsuit might be good politics, but it's bad for free speech.
The article explains why the Supreme Court was justified in overruling longstanding precedent in this important recent constitutional property rights case.
Hundreds of police departments are using facial recognition technology without oversight.
Plus: Clinton says "nobody likes" Bernie, Biden wants Section 230 revoked, Iran takes responsibility for Jan. 8 plane crash, and more...
a good reason to repost Prof. Nicholas Johnson's guest-post on 2014, based on his book Negroes and the Gun.
A new story from Fox 11 (L.A.).
If politicians are going to paint their opponents as illegitimate, they should be prepared to receive the same treatment in return.
There is no easy way to determine whether someone is spending a lot on guns because they like guns or because they plan to commit an act of terror.
Some privacy activists say the bill still falls short.
The governor fears a gun-rights rally might turn violent; a judge refuses to stop him from barring weapons from the demonstration.
Biden tells the New York Times he would revoke Section 230 protections and hold Facebook (and other sites) liable for their content.
The petitioner, who cited the officer's 2017 shooting of her son, had no standing under Colorado's "red flag" law.
The song and music video amount to grotesque, self-obsessed celebrity activism.
The New York Public Library calls off an event featuring feminists who have clashed with the trans rights movement.
Don’t worry—America’s ruling factions still disagree over who should be in charge of the snooping.
"On the record before the Court, the movants have demonstrated 'sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation.'"
The Institute for Justice asks the Supreme Court to clarify a doctrine that shields cops from responsibility for outrageous conduct.
A new abortion case raises an old question.
After seriously messing up its warrant applications with the FISA Court, can the FBI be trusted?
The city limits busking to its tiny Theater District, and it makes you jump through hoops even to play there.
An interesting federal court opinion.
This is the case where two students were shouting "nigger" loudly when walking by UConn dorms; the students are trying to block university discipline based on their speech, including their eviction from student housing.
At least 20 officers have been suspended while the LAPD investigates the placement of innocent motorists on the gang database.
The students say their threatened punishment, for walking near student housing shouting "nigger" (at no-one in particular), violates both the First Amendment and a 1990 consent decree.
Three deputies were placed on leave after the St. Johns County Sheriff's Office received the video.
A deadly shooting on a Naval base in Florida may lead to a new battle against encryption.
"The public may well have an interest in how litigation is funded by third parties," the judge concludes. A law firm and two litigation finance companies are disputing (among other things) whether the litigation finance agreements are illegally usurious.
By complaining to Yale about Bandy Lee's violation of the Goldwater Rule, Dershowitz lets her portray herself as a brave dissident.
Signing a lease instead of a deed shouldn’t erase your right to be free of government home invasions.
Episode 9 of Free Speech Rules, a video series by UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh
So a New Jersey tax court held last week, in a case brought by prominent bank founder Vernon W. Hill.
Asheen Phansey's was responding to President Trump's threat to bomb Iranian cultural sites.
There's also more to the case, which was brought over statements made on a local TV broadcast while Morrissey was unsuccessfully running for Richmond Mayor. (He is now a state senator, elected in November.)
This is the case in which two students were walking near UConn student housing, loudly shouting "nigger" (apparently after having decided that loudly shouting "penis" wasn't good enough).
The proposal is parodying, not endorsing, the nanny state.
The overturned rules banned microscopes and shovels as drug paraphernalia and prohibited pictures of cannabis or the equipment used to grow it.
Protesters say the cost of living is too high and wealth is distributed too unequally.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks