NSA Ruling Reminds Us That Sacrificing Civil Liberties in the Name of National Security Is a Bipartisan Impulse
A federal appeals court concludes that the agency's mass collection of phone records was illegal and probably unconstitutional.
A federal appeals court concludes that the agency's mass collection of phone records was illegal and probably unconstitutional.
Another example of how police can respond poorly to drug and mental health calls
The professor, chair of the Central Michigan University journalism department, was teaching a media law class, and quoted a case that discussed the use of the word "nigger" at public universities.
Plus: People have doubts about democracy, Washington state sues Juul, and more...
Reason asked writers who have been on the criminal justice beat for years to lay out serious proposals for reforms with a fighting chance of being implemented.
Last month, the 9th Circuit said the opposite. It's a question the Supreme Court might have to resolve.
From Prof. John McWhorter (Columbia) in The Atlantic.
“Just because the story and the photograph may be embarrassing or distressful to the plaintiff does not mean the newspaper cannot publish what is otherwise newsworthy.”
The notion that the violent protests cropping up in U.S. cities are funded by a secret, shadowy cabal is a myth.
The Cincinnati Enquirer and I have just filed a petition seeking this, in the Ohio Court of Appeals.
Defeating surveillance is a powerful argument for covering your face.
"When terror is seen as justified, I think it's inevitable that something terrible is going to happen," journalist Nancy Rommelmann told Nick Gillespie last week.
Plus: Congress to vote on marijuana decriminalization, tech visas are getting turned down at high rates, and more...
A thought experiment that came to my mind; I'd love to hear what others think about it.
Plus a new draft law review article on the subject, by Prof. Randall Kennedy (Harvard Law School), a leading scholar of race and the law, and me.
Across the Atlantic from Amazonia lies ... Ambazonia.
There is enough evidence that the Times knew their allegations were false (or at least were likely false) to go to the jury.
Even the most police-skeptical courts grant the doctrine in egregious circumstances.
Three interesting opinions: a sound majority, a plausible concurrence, and another concurrence focused on "hate speech" that I think is unsound.
The cops seized Kevin McBride's $15,000 car because his girlfriend allegedly used it for a $25 marijuana sale.
A pre-Kenosha poll shows support for Black Lives Matter plummeting among white voters in Wisconsin.
David Cole writes in defense of the National Rifle Association
Neither does Portland. But the fact that the violence is continuous and seems to be escalating is cause for concern.
A 17-year-old Illinois teen has been charged with first-degree intentional homicide.
Millions of new firearm owners who have lost faith in cops and government will be a tough audience for shopworn gun control schemes.
Demand justice for those hurt and killed by police. Stop creating more victims.
Evergreen College, but everywhere
Dean Lidsky is a libel law scholar, and one of the two Reporters of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Defamation & Privacy.
The Fourth Circuit decides a case involving defendants who violently participated in two white supremacist rallies in California and in the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, but the logic applies equally to rioters of all stripes.
"I know what moral panics look like; they look kind of like this."
The new law features harsher penalties, 12-hour detentions, and other invitations to abuse government power
When can libel plaintiffs, suing over allegedly false claims of sexual misconduct, sue pseudonymously? When can defendants defend pseudonymously?
The situation in Portland on Day 87 is not getting better.
Kevin McBride argues that Arizona's civil forfeiture law is unconstitutional.
Increasing tensions between the military-backed ruling class and the student-led democracy movement have prompted massive rallies in the capital.
So holds a federal court, quite correctly; of course, the same is true about any religious group, racial group, or other such large group.
"This research will inform and fuel much needed and overdue policy change."
An interesting decision in former AP journalist Charles Ganske's lawsuit against former Member of Parliament Louise Mensch, with allegations of Russian bots and Tweeting frenzies thrown in for good measure.
The rhetoric may not be accurate, but it is definitely useful.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10