Video of Cato Institute Book Forum on Keith Whittington's "Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech"
The Forum features a talk by the author, with commentary by me.
The Forum features a talk by the author, with commentary by me.
The Trump administration is violating the rule of law in the name of upholding it.
More tech folks call themselves libertarian than anything else. So why are they afraid to speak up at work?
But wouldn't have stopped the Cambridge Analytica incident
And President Trump is mad at Amazon for...ruining the postal service?
Advertising "half-priced drinks" is legal. Advertising "two-for-one" drinks is not. Huh?
The retired justice wants to claw back parts of the Bill of Rights.
While America gawks at tales of consensual Trump-spanking, Internet freedom is coming under legislative and cultural attack
Proposal to verify online "bots" is security theater that will make it harder for small online firms to compete with the likes of Facebook.
Spokane Valley (Wash.) resists groups' letter opposing event put on by speaker who has at times drawn unruly supporters.
"They are being watched, and that's a problem."
The great content crackdown has begun.
The vigorous debate over censorship shows how much Iran has changed in recent years.
"The classroom should never be a place where students feel that they are picked at, bullied, intimidated."
The measure will "make it harder, not easier, to root out and prosecute sex traffickers," said Sen. Ron Wyden, one of only two senators to vote no on FOSTA.
"Keep fighting for free speech, the great meme war," said Count Dankula.
There is, it turns out, more to the Stormy Daniels Affair than meets the eye.
The National Lawyers Guild refused to run a congratulatory advertisement submitted by an Israeli organization -- the organization is suing for discrimination in "public accommodations," and a New York court has let the case go forward.
There's no reason for alarm (yet) over a Facebook data "breach" that benefited a firm with ties to Trump's campaign.
"Everything we think about the political correctness debate is wrong," says Vox's Matt Yglesias. Not exactly.
Declining support for unfettered debate among politicians, academics, and the public doesn't bode well for the future of free speech.
"If voters are making [stupid] decisions," says Senior Editor Jacob Sullum, "that's not the Russians' fault."
Nobody has the right to force bakers to print speech they hate. The debate is over what counts as speech.
Rep. Michelle DuBois wants to remove a statehouse sign that reads "General Hooker Entrance" because it is an affront to "women's dignity."
Under Stalin, people could be killed for carrying joke books about him. They did it anyway.
ACLU steps in to fight zoning regulations that appear to let officials veto art based on content.
A web developer's First Amendment lawsuit says Sibley, Iowa, officials conspired to silence him.
"Would that be allowed by the administration?"
For months, Penn Law has resisted calls to punish Amy Wax for her public comments on race. Yesterday, they caved.
"We do not do this lightly, but they have repeatedly posted content designed to incite animosity and hatred against minority groups."
Rallying to call for restrictive laws is a whole lot easier than getting people to submit to them.
Princeton University's Keith Whittington explains why it is sometimes wise -- even necessary -- to expose students to potentially offensive material
Marking the 54th anniversary of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
A lawsuit leads to a suggestion that the president engage in a kinder, gentler ignoring.
That is what students at the University of Miami School of Law are reporting. [EARLIER UPDATE: The Dean tells me that things are more complicated than at first reported, and they're trying to see if things can be worked out; I hope to have more from the Dean in a few days.] [UPDATE 3/15: The University has agreed to pay the security fee.]
It's not just the Second Amendment in their crosshairs.
Rybka has spent the past several years as a protegee of pickup artist and seduction coach Alex Lesley-and picked up a plausible claim to 2016 election dirt along the way.
A very interesting piece by Stanford Prof. Michael McConnell on the Masterpiece Cakeshop case.
Can the government prevent drug firms from telling patients true facts about the medicine they prescribe?
Device makers would be required to block porn, prostitution hubs, and all content that fails "current standards of decency."
Cody Wilson on his war against power, the irreversible course of the 3D-printed gun, and America's Weimar moment
How can a company be expected to arbitrate "fake news" when it can't even tell ancient artifacts from porn?
Mandatory fees are an assault on free association.
The charges -- for "distribution of violent images" -- could lead to up to three years in prison and a $90,000 fine.
"We wanted to capitalize on the real groundswell of support behind free speech from all walks of life."
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.