Elon Musk Throttles Substack, Clashing With Twitter Files' Matt Taibbi
Plus: Dueling court decisions on an abortion drug, an update from Riley Gaines, and more...
Plus: Dueling court decisions on an abortion drug, an update from Riley Gaines, and more...
As former Backpage execs await their August trial, the shutdown is still worsening the lives it was supposed to improve.
New bill makes a mockery of parents’ rights, school choice, and educational freedom.
Three reasons not to ban the popular social media app
Plus: States consider mandatory anti-porn filters, tariffs create baby formula shortages (again), and more...
Today, TikTok. Tomorrow, who knows?
Which sentence in this podcast was generated using A.I.?
This was never about shielding just the youngest kids from sexual topics.
The designer of China's Great Firewall sees new A.I. tech as a concern for public authorities.
Plus: Police sue Afroman for using footage from raid, California bill could ban popular junk foods, and more...
The legal challenge to censorship by proxy highlights covert government manipulation of online speech.
Plus: A listener asks the editors if the nation is indeed unraveling or if she is just one of "The Olds" now.
The latest Twitter Files shows a partnership between Stanford University researchers and government-funded organizations encouraged social media companies to police true information.
"Professors are not mouthpieces for the government," says FIRE's Joe Cohn. "For decades, the Supreme Court of the United States has defended professors' academic freedom from governmental intrusion."
Americans shouldn't have to fight to the death to defend their foes' right to speak, but they should at least stop trying to censor, shame, shun and destroy each other.
In countries that privatized, there are fewer delays and costs are lower. But labor unions and the private plane lobby stand in the way.
The bill is overbroad and could have unintended consequences.
Plus: The editors recommend the best books for sparking interest in free market principles.
Members of Congress showed their true colors at a Thursday hearing.
A new survey from FIRE reveals rampant illiberalism and self-censorship among young faculty.
Florida's H.B. 999 claims to support "viewpoint diversity" and "intellectual rigor." It does just the opposite.
Gonzalez v. Google presents the Supreme Court’s first opportunity to weigh in on Section 230.
A government-supported organization's controversial ratings of online news sources illustrate the challenge of deciding what qualifies as disinformation.
Plus: Government regulation of speech is on trial, biohackers flock to experimental charter city in Honduras, and more…
"I pray wherever I go, inside my head, for the people around me," said one priest. "How can it be a crime for a priest to pray?"
A rogues’ gallery of institutions that anybody with an independent mind should skip.
The paper is unfazed by First Amendment objections to the Biden administration's crusade against "misinformation" on social media.
"My artwork is unapologetic," said the artist. "Sometimes it can be very political. Sometimes it can be very controversial."
Apparently, parents’ rights don’t extend to letting their kids listen to naughty Christmas lyrics.
Plus: Judge strikes down Super Bowl censorship law, report details how much inflation was driven by stimulus spending, and more...
They both share in their authoritarian desires to censor online speech and violate citizen privacy.
Why is Gov. Ron DeSantis acting just like his opposition by attempting to dictate what students are permitted to learn?
"If you don't like a book, don't read it. The First Amendment's guarantee of the freedom of speech and the right to access information has created a beautiful marketplace of ideas in our country," said one ACLU representative opposing the bill.
Plus: FOSTA in court, challenges to Illinois' assault weapon ban, and more...
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1 p.m. ET for a discussion of the Facebook Files with Robby Soave.
Throughout the pandemic, the CDC was in constant contact with Facebook, vetting what users were allowed to say on the social media site.
An op-ed in The New York Times tries to make the case that the Chinese Communist Party is a worthy partner in raising children.
Tech firm operators may face criminal charges if children who use their platforms encounter too much “harmful content.”
Good intentions, bad results
Researchers: Moscow’s social media meddling had little impact on the 2016 election.
Plus: House votes to rescind IRS funding, the FDA is putting unnecessary strings on pharmacies filling abortion pill prescriptions, and more...
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10