Gun Rights Activists Join Abortion Rights Activists To Fight Texas Abortion Law
The Texas law “could just as easily be used by other States to restrict First or Second Amendment rights,” the Firearms Policy Coalition tells SCOTUS.
The Texas law “could just as easily be used by other States to restrict First or Second Amendment rights,” the Firearms Policy Coalition tells SCOTUS.
The gun rights group has filed a brief supporting the petition for certiorari in one of the cases challenging the controversial Texas abortion law.
Despite his criticisms of Roe, he also believed in stare decisis
The verdict was chiefly based on the actions of protesters and arsonists; the Georgia Court of Appeals rejected it, and the Georgia Supreme Court has just refused to rehear the case.
Whatever this system is, it is not pro-life.
The experience with the Texas Heartbeat Act offers a preview of what that means.
Governments should not design laws and regulations to frustrate judicial review.
S.B. 8 allows lawsuits against people who perform prohibited abortions even if they relied on a court's determination that the law is unconstitutional.
In a prior case challenging the law, the 5th Circuit said state judges were not appropriate defendants.
Plus: Twitter's new trigger warnings, good news for food freedom, and more...
The justices robe up for another term.
Plus: Government shutdown, demographic diversity in rural America, and more...
In the first two lawsuits filed under S.B. 8, all of the parties seem to think enforcement of the law should be blocked.
It's the one amicus brief supporting Mississippi's abortion restriction that takes a wrecking ball to the Supreme Court's fundamental-rights precedents
For the most part, supporters of Mississippi's abortion ban in the Supreme Court are steering clear of Obergefell
Plus: The link between college and moral absolutism, environmental activists vs. Facebook, and more...
Alan Braid says he broke the law, which prohibits the vast majority of abortions, to make sure it would be tested in court.
“The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized the authority of the United States...to seek equitable relief to vindicate various federal interests and constitutional guarantees.”
Meanwhile, the threat posed by the lawsuits that S.B. 8 authorizes has dramatically curtailed access to abortion in Texas.
Respectfully disagreeing with Josh about United States v. Texas.
Pro-lifers and pro-choicers have one thing in common: a passion for snitching
S.B. 8 relies on litigation tricks that conservatives have long condemned as a threat to the rule of law.
Plus, why is no one talking about the Medicare Trustees' entitlement report?
While libertarians will be inclined to applaud some of the new laws, others exemplify familiar conservative excesses.
By and large, those schemes (like Texas’s SB 8 liability for abortion providers) must be fought by raising the Constitution as a defense in a civil lawsuit—not through preenforcement challenges.
The same legal ruse can be used against gun rights and other civil liberties, not just against abortion.
Plus: More bad news for free speech online, Fauci on booster shots, and more...
The decision is wrong, but consistent with previous precedent. Yet it also threatens to create a road map for circumventing constitutional rights. Fortunately, the latter can be prevented.
Plus: Millennial myth busting, McFlurry madness, and more...
Because the Supreme Court so far has not intervened, post-heartbeat abortions are now illegal in the Lone Star State.
Plus: Kids got more obese during the pandemic, how Section 230 protects gun rights, and more...
I coauthored it with Kevin Cope (University of Virginia) and Alex Stremitzer (UCLA/ETH Zurich)
Opposed by LGBT and pro-choice advocacy groups, the measure allows doctors to refuse to perform treatments on moral grounds
We can thank judges who were prepared to enforce constitutional limits on public health powers.
When (1) states seek to protect abortion rights / gun rights / speech rights against private restriction, and (2) Congress seeks to encourage such private restrictions by preempting the state law protections, might such federal preemption violate the Constitution?
A new decision from the Georgia Court of Appeals.
Plus: Columbus cops charged over treatment of protesters, Biden cancels Trump's TikTok ban, and more...
There are "Two Obstacles to (Merely) Chipping Away at Roe in Dobbs," he writes
For decades, Western apologists downplayed the horrific consequences of China’s reproductive restrictions..
National surveys obscure large regional variations in public opinion about abortion limits.
Plus: Death penalty proposed for Atlanta massage parlor shooter, judge tosses Google antitrust suit, and more...
Plus: Clarity on Adam Toledo's death, Big Tech antitrust bill approved by House Democrats, and more...
Plus: Legal battle over published arrest records, senators introduce cruise ship legislation, and more...
The 9-7 en banc ruling appears to rest on the ban applying on to doctors who know the woman's reason; women could apparently still get such abortions if they don't disclose the reason.
Plus: Copyright case a win for Google and fair use, California considering repeal of its "loitering with intent to commit prostitution" law, and more...
While overturning Roe v. Wade would lead to new restrictions in many states, legal access to abortion would be unaffected in most of the country.
Plus: Wisconsin may approve microschools, what will Biden Title IX guidance look like, and more...
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10