Opposition to Kavanaugh stems from a case that was decided the year Kavanaugh was born and was argued by professors from the law school from which he graduated.
Clinton runs with a Kamala Harris whopper that's already been debunked.
This time the Libertarian Party seems to be hurting the Democrat, who's trying to run out the clock on confirming Brett Kavanaugh.
"Brett Kavanaugh said he would kill Roe v. Wade last week." Except he didn't.
Harris and other Democrats distorted Kavanaugh's comments on birth control to portray him as a religious extremist.
Fun fact: All laws give government control of the decisions that everybody of any gender can do with their bodies.
Don't assume Roe v. Wade will be safe with Justice Kavanaugh.
Pro-life and a Democrat? Missouri's Democratic Party isn't interested.
Had the bill passed, Argentina's conservative president said he would sign it into law.
They should tread carefully before scrapping reproductive rights now that the possibility of overturning Roe v. Wade is real
It is both philosophically and strategically wrong.
Cornell law professor Michael Dorf asks whether Clarence Thomas would vote to strike down federal laws restricting abortion, on federalism grounds. The answer might well be yes. But the issue would have to be presented to him in the right way.
Many Democrats have come out against Kavanaugh's nomination, arguing that he'll mean the end of Roe v. Wade.
Plus, what they might be like in a post-Roe world
Current liberal court-packing proposals are dangerously misguided - and for much the same reasons as last year's conservative court-packing plan.
The Kentucky Republican was asked if Trump should nominate a justice who thinks "an unborn child with a beating heart is a person."
Forget coat-hangers and back alleys. The future of illegal abortions is online pharmaceuticals.
"The majority's view, if taken literally, could radically change prior law," warn the Court's liberal justices.
Comparing the records of two right-of-center justices.
The mercurial justice lets everybody down, again.
His sneak attack on the reproductive rights of women.
Civil debate, whether on Trump/Russia, gun policy, or fungible abortion funding, begins in the workplace.
Does their commitment to family values stop at the Rio Grande's edge?
The percentage of young adults saying abortion should be legal in all or most cases has risen 10 percentage points since 2015.
Williamson's rhetoric is inflammatory, but his views on abortion are not beyond the pale.
The nation's most-restrictive law is passed amidst a long-term decline in unwanted pregnancies.
With abortion pills easily accessible online, the issue could be a big one in coming years.
Congressional conservatives want to ban "discrimination against the unborn on the basis of sex."
Conservative apologia for Roy Moore and hostility toward his opponent are anchored on an issue individual senators are highly unlikely to impact.
The point seems to elude The New York Times.
A amendment from Democrats says no state money can go to defending the law in court.
Crisis pregnancy centers in California say the state's "Reproductive FACT Act" violates their First Amendment rights.
This was a simple choice: Compel the girl to give birth or let her get an abortion. The fact that she is undocumented doesn't change that reality.
Businesses shouldn't have to serve those who offend them.
The rules' purpose is to "indoctrinate pregnant women into the belief held by some...Christians that a separate and unique human being begins at conception" said appeals court.
Two disturbing sex scandals underscore why a historic number of Americans want a major third party.
The Trump administration has signaled support for the ban, which would throw abortion doctors in jail and let women who get abortions sue their doctors.
The Capital Care Network was ordered to close in 2014. Instead, it took the state to court.
Anchoring abortion access to the insurance market won't make it more affordable. But it will result in a lot of legal drama...
Missouri's governor has called a special session to try to override the ordinance. Here's what libertarians need to know.
Bioethicists in Britain say yes. But there are no such limits in the U.S. yet.
Attorney General Xavier Becerra uses privacy as a pretext for a political vendetta against critics of Planned Parenthood.
Look beyond Medicaid to really cut dependence on Planned Parenthood while still ensuring that low-income women have access to medical care.
"I'm for limited government, so stay out of my guns, and you can stay out of my body as well," said Lahren on The View last week.
