Defending Amy Coney Barrett, Ted Cruz Highlights the Threats That Democrats Pose to Civil Liberties
The Texas senator notes the opposing party's blind spots on freedom of speech and the right to arms.
The Texas senator notes the opposing party's blind spots on freedom of speech and the right to arms.
The Court adds an important Appointments Clause case to the docket.
Petitions for certiorari in the other two Emoluments Clause cases remain pending.
Republicans understandably prepared for attacks on Barrett's faith which thankfully haven't materialized.
There is little reason to think Barrett would vote to overturn the Affordable Care Act, which in any case seems legally secure.
Plus: $150,000+ in fines in NYC's first weekend of new shutdowns, California ballot-box confusion, and more...
She's unlikely to cast a vote to strike down the law as a whole, and unlikely to have a decisive impact on its fate even if she does.
The National Law Journal asked several legal commentators to suggest questions for the president's Supreme Court nominee.
Plus: Trump says he plans to hold rallies despite lack of negative COVID-19 test, Biden won't answer question on court-packing, and more...
Two debates. Two dodges of an important question about the top court's future.
The original rules might not be found in the text.
Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito worry about the future of religious freedom. That’s not the same as a call to overturn the decision.
The Supreme Court decides a decent number of environmental cases, but does not seem particularly interested in environmental concerns.
When it comes to criminal justice and abortion, Barrett and Ginsburg may have far more in common than conservatives and progressives seem to realize.
Does participation in a moot court require recusal?
A core element of the latest case against the Affordable Care Act rests on a legal fiction.
As more senators test positive for COVID-19, the ability of the Senate to conduct business is threatened.
The Supreme Court accepted certiorari on a climate change case today.
"If it were me, I would certainly put my nominee forth," Jorgensen says. Partisan bickering over the confirmation process is just "politics as usual."
Judge Amy Coney Barrett participated in a moot court of Texas v. California, and it did not go well for the challengers.
The 7th Circuit judge’s track record suggests she would frequently be a friend of civil liberties.
Supreme Court term limits are a good idea. But they must be enacted by constitutional amendment, not by statute.
Major-party politicians avoid tax simplification almost as aggressively as the rich avoid taxation, argue the Reason Roundtable panelists.
Noah Feldman explains why liberals should want someone like Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court
The opinion, which suggests a strong concern about due process, will nevertheless be cited as evidence of the SCOTUS nominee's "uniformly conservative" record.
If confirmed, she would cement a strong 6-3 conservative majority.
What I wrote in 2016 still applies today.
Progressives are promising to get rid of this long-standing check on the power of raw majorities in the Senate just when it would help them the most.
Reviewing the record of the SCOTUS shortlister.
The SCOTUS contender's 2019 dissent will alarm gun control supporters but reassure people who want judges to take this constitutional provision as seriously as others.
The idea has a lot of merit. But it will be hard to enact, and probably won't do much to end partisan conflict over Supreme Court appointments.
The case is an encouraging sign that the SCOTUS contender is not the sort of judge who bends over backward to shield cops from liability for outrageous misconduct.
Limiting justices to a single 18-year term would de-escalate judicial confirmation fights.
The restrictions imagined by Republicans in 2016 or by Democrats now are nothing but self-serving nonsense.
The prospects are far from ideal. But it is still potentially feasible.
The fight to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg reveals a long-degraded political culture.
While the 7th Circuit judge is often skeptical of the government's position, some of her conclusions will give pause to civil libertarians.
Plus: Trump wants to rob TikTok to pay for "patriotic education," the CDC can't confirm any cases of airplane spread, Virginia uses new "red flag" gun law, and more...
Simply put: Republicans agree not to vote on a replacement for Ginsburg until January; Democrats agree not to pack the Court.
What's next for SCOTUS?
The passing of a feminist heroine, and a giant of American jurisprudence.
Her death creates a vacancy on the Supreme Court just weeks before the presidential election and is likely to spark a major political fight.
October arguments will be over the phone again.
Like it or not, this is the Roberts Court now.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks