Let the WOTUS Wars Commence
The EPA and Supreme Court set the stage for important legal decisions on the scope of the Clean Water Act.
The EPA and Supreme Court set the stage for important legal decisions on the scope of the Clean Water Act.
In a 5-4 decision, the Court issued a temporary stay of a Louisiana law that could put abortion doctors out of business.
Some troubling uncertainties in a case of troubling allegations of religious discrimination
Clint Bolick, a co-founder of the Institute for Justice, was for years one of the libertarian movement's most successful trial lawyers.
New York City's arbitrary restrictions on transporting firearms give SCOTUS a chance to curtail rampant disrespect for the Second Amendment.
The conservative justices listed a key factor preventing them from hearing the case.
In first Supreme Court Second Amendment case since 2010, Court must decide whether the right applies in any meaningful sense outside the home.
The Court voted along ideological lines.
Tennessee alcohol merchants are asking the Supreme Court to uphold an absurd residency requirement that shields them from competition.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor has some concerns.
A 5-4 decision, but not along the lines we usually expect.
Warrantless "implied consent" laws are under review over Fourth Amendment concerns.
SCOTUS' decision not to hear the case could lead to a vicious food fight between the states
Don Willett has championed economic freedom and accountability for cops.
Only if you like the cause they serve, according to supporters of laws that target the anti-Israel BDS movement
It's not the first time the two justices have teamed up on a criminal justice case.
A Republican gerrymander in North Carolina and a Democratic gerrymander in Maryland give the court another chance to set some rules for redistricting.
Online room-sharing services had no avenue to legally challenge demands for private info.
Asians sue Harvard for discrimination in a case that may end college racial preferences.
Thanks to its role overseeing maritime law, the Supreme Court will soon rule on liability limits for manufacturers adjacent to the asbestos industry.
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services allows those who are physically present in the U.S. or have entered at a port of entry to apply for asylum.
Is he rejecting a customer or rejecting a message? The difference matters.
A case to watch for both criminal justice reformers and for critics of executive overreach.
In a case SCOTUS will hear next month, victims of Tennessee's protectionism argue that it flouts the 14th Amendment as well as the Commerce Clause.
"If Kavanaugh was going to deal a major blow to health care rights during his first session on the court, this would have been the case to do it."
The Supreme Court seems disinclined to overturn precedents allowing serial prosecutions of the same crime.
The Supreme Court should reconsider the misbegotten "dual sovereignty" doctrine.
Where does Justice Gorsuch stand on the Privileges or Immunities Clause?
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer elicited a shocking response during Wednesday's oral argument in a big civil asset forfeiture case.
The Supreme Court should make it clear that state forfeitures are constrained by the Excessive Fines Clause.
The "trial of the century" may not happen after all.
The two jurists dissent from denial of certiorari in Stuart v. Alabama.
Cases in which a majority of the Court fell down on the job.
Why both the dissent and majority in Janus were wrong, and what the next lawsuits may look like.
The Supreme Court's call for supplemental briefing in Frank v. Gaos will lead it to a difficult question.
The Iowa Republican is dialing up the anti-gay rhetoric.
The Supreme Court issues its first OT2018 decision in an argued case.
As more reforms take hold, expect more challenges-especially if states end up detaining more people.
Clint Bolick faces a judicial retention fight.
Striking down exclusive representation would allow labor organizers to give the boot to free-riding employees.
Justices are being asked yet again to argue about wedding cakes and whether the Civil Rights Act covers discrimination against gay and transgender people.
The 5th Circuit judge weighs in on qualified immunity, criminal sentencing, and false imprisonment.
Jim Lindgren proposes a constitutional amendment banning court-packing. I'm all for it. But it can only pass if liberal Democrats get some reciprocal concession to support it.