Stephen Breyer Makes the Liberal Case Against Court Packing
In his new book, the 83-year-old justice warns court-packing advocates to “think long and hard before embodying those changes in law.”
In his new book, the 83-year-old justice warns court-packing advocates to “think long and hard before embodying those changes in law.”
Plus: Millennial myth busting, McFlurry madness, and more...
Because the Supreme Court so far has not intervened, post-heartbeat abortions are now illegal in the Lone Star State.
The Court said it "strains credulity" to believe that Congress gave the CDC the "breathtaking amount of authority" it asserted.
Plus: Biden won't budge on Afghanistan, bad news for psychedelics measure in California, and more...
The Biden Administration suffers a significant loss on the Supreme Court's "shadow docket."
The Supreme Court will hear the case this fall.
An interesting historical tidbit about the nomination of David Souter to the Supreme Court
The university's vaccine requirement will remain in force.
The most powerful officers are held to the lowest standard of accountability.
The administration issued the order even while conceding that it lacked the authority to do so.
The Supreme Court will likely rule against Biden’s executive gambit.
“New York enacted its firearm licensing requirements to criminalize gun ownership by racial and ethnic minorities.”
Biden’s Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court seems to favor judicial term limits.
Culture war bills signed into law in Arkansas, West Virginia, and Tennessee run afoul of Constitution, federal law.
Religious families aren’t the only ones seeking escape from endless curriculum wars.
It could, if it actually had the vast public health powers that the Biden administration claims it does.
"The Second Amendment does not exist to protect only the rights of the happy few who distinguish themselves from the body of 'the people' through some 'proper cause.'"
The fight over qualified immunity divides "conservative" judges on the 5th Circuit.
Replacing the Court's most pro-government justice with a young progressive might make a bigger difference than expected.
A discussion with Mario Loyola on the Supreme Court's latest Affordable Care Act Decision
"Redress for a federal officer's unconstitutional acts is either extremely limited or wholly nonexistent."
We can thank judges who were prepared to enforce constitutional limits on public health powers.
It's an indication that the notorious decision holding that the government can take property for private "economic development" may be vulnerable.
The Court has "failed to justify our enacted policy," he wrote.
The controversial 2005 case "strayed from the Constitution," say Thomas and Gorsuch.
He repeats his concern that QI doctrine rests on "shaky ground" and imposes a "one-size-fits-all doctrine" that is "an odd fit for many cases," including those involving university administrators.
Six justices agreed that the state's "dragnet for sensitive donor information" imposes "a widespread burden on donors' associational rights."
The junior justice wrote only four signed opinions in argued cases, but had several dissents from the April sitting.
The Court's final opinions did not offer many surprises.
The Court left increasingly urgent questions about taxing remote workers up in the air.
Brett Kavanaugh, who provided a crucial fifth vote, said he agrees that the CDC does not have the authority to override rental contracts.
It's likely that soon, almost all Americans will be legally able to carry guns.
A majority refused to lift a stay of a district court injunction against the order, but five justices indicated they believe the order is illegal.
The Court lets the CDC's eviction moratorium remain in place, even though a majority seems to believe CDC's action is unlawful.
The officers might receive qualified immunity, however.
The Supreme Court issues three opinions in argued cases that split three different ways.
An unusual but welcome move.
Sixteen years after Gonzales v. Raich, Thomas is back with another opinion criticizing the federal government’s marijuana ban.
The refusal leaves in place a federal court decision favoring trans students' right to insist on accommodation.
In an opinion respecting the denial of certiorari, Justice Thomas suggests it may be time to reconsider Gonzales v. Raich
No, Justice Alito's opinion for the Court did not endorse standing-through-inseverability.
An interesting administrative law tidbit in one of today's Supreme Court decisions.
Another day in which the conservative justices split on constitutional and statutory questions, and the Court split along gender lines in a case concerning renewable fuels.
The article assesses today's important Supreme Court property rights ruling.
First Amendment advocates prevailed in Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.
"In lower courts' view, [a] federal badge now equals absolute immunity."