Joe Biden Tried To Use the Regulatory State To Micromanage Everything
The Biden administration's war on "junk fees" is emblematic of its nanny state instincts.
The Biden administration's war on "junk fees" is emblematic of its nanny state instincts.
For decades, federal rules punished good Samaritans who tried to tackle toxic mine pollution. A new program removes barriers to restoring waterways across the West.
By one account, regulations cost American households over $15,000 per year. Here's hoping DOGE can help.
What began as a vibrant, organic solution to a crisis has been stifled by overregulation.
An apt ending to Joe Biden's war on junk fees, which only made sense if you refused to acknowledge trade-offs and believed federal regulators are all-knowing.
A judge says the federal law has no constitutional basis and threatens First and Fourth Amendment rights.
Big Chicken wins while small farmers and processors face costly regulations—and consumers remain at risk.
From the war in Afghanistan to the war on drugs, Reason writers offer performance reviews of Joe Biden's single term as president.
Give us your money to keep the government out of your cocktails, your cherries, your raw milk, your psychedelics, and other forms of fun.
An e-liquid manufacturer is challenging the FDA's "arbitrary and capricious" rejection of flavored vaping products.
The FDA’s regulations are burdensome and unnecessary to address the inflated high school vaping epidemic.
Despite its enormous budget and vast regulatory powers, the agency has failed to detect major frauds while wasting time and money on relatively useless disclosures.
Belgian sex work groups are cheering the new law. But it could come with some downsides.
Cultivated meat is getting better and better. That's why states keep trying to ban it.
The company, which says it takes an "apolitical approach" to rating news outlets, faces regulatory threats and a congressional probe because of its perceived bias against conservatives.
The proposal brings to mind the classic "bootleggers and Baptists" theory in which both moralists and competitors oppose a substance.
Brendan Carr’s plans for "reining in Big Tech" are a threat to limited government, free speech, free markets, and the rule of law.
With the help of New York’s environmental review law, local NIMBYs halted an approved housing project, adding to delays and costs in a city facing a housing shortage.
"Reining in Big Tech," Brendan Carr says, requires scrapping liability protections and restricting moderation decisions.
His priorities may not be the drastic reforms that are actually needed.
Even with burgeoning private sector support, nuclear can’t thrive without regulatory reform.
Many seriously ill people die waiting for the FDA to approve drugs that regulators in other advanced countries have already approved.
The states already overregulate alcohol. There's no need for a federal layer of red tape.
Climate change is a serious environmental concern, but it is not clear how the EPA helps.
Apparently consumers are too stupid to know that butter contains milk.
Federal regulators have rejected a proposal to increase electricity generation from a nuclear power plant to a large data center in Pennsylvania.
The justices, including Trump's nominees, have shown they are willing to defy his will when they think the law requires it.
In the Abolish Everything issue, Reason writers make the case for ending the Fed, the Army, Social Security, and everything else.
Even the poorest citizens of free countries fare better than the middle classes in economically repressive nations.
The Building Chips in America Act shields CHIPS-subsidized firms from the National Environmental Policy Act.
Regulating AI could threaten free speech, just as earlier proposed regulations of other media once did.
The Institute for Justice partners with an independent eye doctor to challenge state regulations that protect hospital monopolies and restrict patient access.
In the heart of California Wine Country, rigid local rules are choking small businesses and stifling growth
"Invoking the innocence of children is not...a magic incantation sufficient for legislatures to run roughshod over the First Amendment rights of adults."
A trucker lost his job because he tested positive for marijuana after consuming a supposedly THC-free CBD tincture.
The Treasury's sweeping rule curtailing dual-use technology transactions with Chinese firms will reduce domestic growth, innovation, and security.
The state's powerful coastal land-use regulator is arguing its awesome development-stopping powers applies to rocket launches as well as housing.
Geothermal projects promise nearly limitless energy, but they are being stymied by environmental policies.
The National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration is holding vehicles to higher standards than it does drivers.
The Jones Act makes the North Slope’s resources inaccessible to the state’s energy-starved residents.
Anti-market progressives dominate the Biden administration. Their policies also help discredit it.
For more than three decades, the Institute for Justice has shown that economic freedom and private property are essential safeguards for ordinary Americans.
Although the framing is a transparent political ploy, it is reassuring to see that the vice president has not abandoned her opposition to the federal ban.
Few problems can be resolved by grandstanding politicians threatening new penalties.
Americans are turning to home-cooked meals, but state regulators are making it harder for small food businesses to survive.
Why is making spirits for personal use any of the government’s business in the first place?
Government incompetence strikes again, turning the wine industry upside down with red tape and confusion.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10