Map: Pearl Clutchers in Hot Spring County
A rural Arkansas county files more than twice as many FCC complaints per resident than anywhere else in the United States.
A rural Arkansas county files more than twice as many FCC complaints per resident than anywhere else in the United States.
However distasteful, the First Amendment protects a citizen’s right to give a police officer the middle finger.
The town of Lakeland will have to refund Julie Pereira $688 in fines and fees and pay her $1 in nominal damages for violating her First Amendment rights.
Upcoming legislation would repeal parts of the 1873 law that could be used to target abortion, but the Comstock Act's reach is much more broad than that.
The bill also attempts to ban drag performances at public libraries.
Censorship of 2,872 Pennsylvania license plates raises free speech questions.
These aren't outright bans. But they still can chill free speech and academic freedom.
The Biden administration's interference with bookselling harks back to a 1963 Supreme Court case involving literature that Rhode Island deemed dangerous.
The proposal seems to conflict with a Supreme Court ruling against laws that criminalize mere possession of obscene material.
It could also outlaw any sort of sexualized image, play, or performance, pornographic or not.
Abortion issues come before two other state Supreme Courts—in Arizona and Wyoming—this week as well.
While minors were required to be accompanied by an adult to attend the event, state regulators still went after the "not appropriate" drag performance.
The ruling is the latest in a series of legal defeats for anti-drag laws.
It should be obvious that drag performances are protected by the First Amendment, but that hasn't kept government officials from trying to ban them.
Plus: Librarians take on Arkansas book restrictions, another migrant stunt may have originated in Florida, and more...
In 2018, director James Gunn was fired from the film for gross tweets. But this comic book sequel shows the value of his gross-out sensibility.
It’s already illegal to expose minors to obscenity, so what is this bill really for?
"The Town has routinely detained, cited, and forced Mr. Brunet to go to trial to vindicate his constitutional rights, taking the extraordinary step of adopting a boldly unconstitutional local Ordinance to silence him," the complaint reads.
"If you don't like a book, don't read it. The First Amendment's guarantee of the freedom of speech and the right to access information has created a beautiful marketplace of ideas in our country," said one ACLU representative opposing the bill.
Some conservatives toss “parents’ rights” out the window in a holiday culture war against kids at live shows.
at least through a preliminary injunction, even if the books include some moderately graphic descriptions.
An effort to ban sales of two books to minors ended with a Virginia judge saying that the state’s obscenity statute is “unconstitutional on its face."
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board determined this week that an applicant cannot have the exclusive rights to everybody's favorite curse word.
An isolated sexually themed passage, even a graphic one, doesn't make a work obscene.
You absolutely, positively shouldn't be allowed to read it. Definitely forbidden.
This finding is now being used as a basis for seeking a restraining order banning Barnes & Noble from distributing the books to minors. Is that constitutional?
A new bill would alter state law to remove an educational exception for disseminating works the community deems "harmful" to minors.
Plus: Most Republicans oppose fetal heartbeat laws, FDA authorizes rapid at-home COVID-19 tests, and more...
A federal judge says an anti-porn group's suit against Twitter can move forward, in a case that could portend a dangerous expansion of how courts define "sex trafficking."
The Columbia linguist discusses his new book Nine Nasty Words and dismisses the ideological excesses of the 'anti-racism' movement.
Plus: National Labor Relations Board rules against The Federalist, France is getting less free, and more...
GOP attacks on internet smut are heating up, but the porn industry has more practical threats to worry about.
Jurors remain free to exercise judgment and mercy in a criminal justice system that often lacks both.
Conservatives are wrong on policy, and really wrong on facts
The People v. Lawrence Ferlinghetti explains how America embraced free speech—and how we're ready to throw it away.
No ifs, ands, or butts about it.
Today it's creators, not cops, who want to banish R. Crumb, onetime king of the comics underground.
Plus: A judge says Jeffrey Epstein case was mishandled, and Andrea Dworkin is making a comeback.
The state law targeted people who share erotic photographs of others without their consent.
How can a company be expected to arbitrate "fake news" when it can't even tell ancient artifacts from porn?
From the man that helped Utah declare porn a "public health crisis."
City worries bikini hot dog stands could be next.
Five terrible, perpetually recurring arguments, debunked.
It's only doing what it *has* to do, by Congress' mandate, which is to investigate *all* complaints. BTW, f*ck the FCC!
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10