Ron DeSantis Is Clumsily Backing Away From His Past as a Russia Hawk
DeSantis' foreign policy seems to be defined by a simple rule: Whatever Democrats do is wrong, but whatever Republicans do is right.
DeSantis' foreign policy seems to be defined by a simple rule: Whatever Democrats do is wrong, but whatever Republicans do is right.
In rebuking the legislation, the president showed that he may not know what's in it.
Both parties are complicit in the lethal policies that gave us fentanyl disguised as Percocet.
But it's exactly what they need to start talking about.
Politicians say they want to subsidize various industries, but they sabotage themselves by weighing the policies down with rules that have nothing to do with the plans.
Mark Brnovich left office without issuing a final report, according to documents released by his successor.
The justices seem to be clearly leaning against the Biden Administration on the merits. The procedural issue of standing is a closer call, though ultimately more likely than not to come out the same way.
The Supreme Court considers the scope of presidential power in Biden v. Nebraska and Department of Education v. Brown.
It's less bad than Trump-era efforts along the same lines. But saying that is damning with faint praise.
Plus: Texas prosecutors can't criminally charge people who help others access out-of-state abortions, food trucks fight rules banning them in 96 percent of North Carolina city, and more...
A compilation of my work on this topic, on the one-year anniversary of the start of Vladimir Putin's attempt to conquer Ukraine.
After one year, whatever morale boost Biden’s visit provided won’t necessarily have concrete, strategic effects in Ukraine.
"If it was an emergency, why wait three years to provide the forgiveness? Why present it in a political framework, as fulfilling a campaign promise?" said one higher education expert.
Many Democrats and Republicans were outraged when Trump and Biden respectively were found with classified documents. But both sides are missing the point.
Like his predecessors, the current president ignores the law when it suits him.
Plus: the editors field a listener question on intellectual property.
The article explains the broader issues at stake in these cases, and why the Court would do well to rule against the administration.
Plus: The National Endowment for Democracy ends funding of conservative media blacklist, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear major internet free speech case, and more...
The move makes it more likely that Title 42 expulsions of migrants will end in the near future.
Most independent contractors don’t want the PRO Act anyway.
As legislators refuse to act, benefits will be cut without any possibility of sheltering those seniors who are poor.
The president reaped political benefits with his pre-election proclamation but has yet to follow through.
The old-age entitlement is unsustainable, unfair, and unnecessary. Replace it with something that helps the needy of any age.
Election betting markets are often more reliable than pundits. Did the site steal user funds? No. Did they lie to people? No. Harm anyone? No.
Plus: a listener question on prohibition and a lightning round on the editors' favorite Super Bowl moments
Denuclearization is not possible at any remotely acceptable price, and that may not change for decades to come.
By raising the effective tax rate on capital gains, the proposal would reduce U.S. saving, discourage entrepreneurship, and decrease economic output.
And increase total health care costs to boot.
Instead of empowering the government to intervene, we should look more holistically at the experience of young people online.
Legal scholar Michael Dorf claims Supreme Court should rule on this basis. But the doctrine doesn't apply to this case, and is dubious anyway.
As Biden mentioned fentanyl deaths in his State of the Union address, Republicans called on him to close the border. But "open borders" aren't to blame for overdoses.
If so, Title 42 expulsions might finally end. But it's not a done deal yet.
During the State of the Union, Biden claimed that "children who go to preschool are nearly 50 percent more likely to finish high school and go on to earn a two- or four-year degree," but evidence in favor of universal pre-k programs is lacking.
Biden's speech offered plenty of opportunity to present a counter-narrative to continued taxes and spending. Instead Sanders went a different direction.
To reduce cancer deaths, Biden should stop restricting safer nicotine alternatives.
The bipartisan (if shouty!) embrace of big-government nationalism ensures our populist moment won't end any time soon.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion about the Second Amendment, gun control, and mass shootings.
As usual, Biden's gun policy proposals bump up against reality.
His State of the Union address sketched a foreign policy that is reckless on some points, relatively restrained on others, and utterly uninterested in any real resolution to America’s lingering military entanglements.
In his State of the Union address Tuesday, President Joe Biden said that he wants to hold police "accountable." But he neglected to mention the elephant in the room.
Plus: Bill would make all social media platforms check IDs, appeals court rejects rent control challenge, and more...
These days, he may run for president. His politics have changed.
The president's State of the Union address re-upped a tired, old promise to spend more tax dollars on less infrastructure.
His administration has contributed to the problems Biden says he wants to solve.
Biden vowed to block any attempts to cut Social Security benefits, and Republicans made it clear that they have little appetite to try it.
What we can learn from the State of the Union addresses by Jimmy Carter in 1979, Richard Nixon in 1971, and JFK in 1963
Plus: Court denies motion to suppress January 6 geofence warrant, Texas may ban some immigrants from buying property, and more...