The NRA's Unanimous Supreme Court Victory Is Good for Free Speech—No Matter How You Feel About Guns
The ACLU, another polarizing organization, was willing to defend the NRA in court. That should tell you that some things aren't partisan.
The ACLU, another polarizing organization, was willing to defend the NRA in court. That should tell you that some things aren't partisan.
The Sixth Amendment was originally seen as vital to preserving liberty. Yet it has been consistently watered down.
Judge Carlton Reeves ripped apart the legal doctrine in his latest decision on the matter.
Prosecutor Ralph Petty was also employed as a law clerk—by the same judges he argued before.
Why originalist criticisms of Dobbs often misfire, and why criticisms *of* Dobbs's originalism often misfire too.
Hoover’s reign at the FBI compromised American civil liberties and turned the FBI into America's secret police.
The cars of two Alabama women were seized for more than a year before courts found they were innocent owners. The Supreme Court says they had no constitutional right to a preliminary hearing.
Christian McGhee is suing, arguing a North Carolina assistant principal infringed on his free speech rights.
With 54 out of 60 seats in Congress, President Nayib Bukele’s party holds significant influence over legislative decisions.
The Supreme Court will decide whether former presidents can avoid criminal prosecution by avoiding impeachment and removal.
Columbia law professor David Pozen recalls the controversy provoked by early anti-drug laws and the hope inspired by subsequent legal assaults on prohibition.
There are many pervasive myths about the U.S. tax code. Here are a few.
The push to regulate social media content infringes on rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
Joe Biden is the latest of a string of presidents to deny Congress its rightful role in war making.
Michael Garrett and other Texas inmates get less than four hours of sleep a night. He argues it's cruel and unusual punishment.
The Institute for Justice says its data show that a century-old Supreme Court doctrine created a huge exception to the Fourth Amendment.
Kristy Kay Money and Rolf Jacob Sraubhaar are now suing the city of San Marcos, Texas, saying they're being forced to keep a Klan-linked symbol on the front of their house is a physical taking.
New Jersey fishermen are challenging a 40-year-old precedent that gives executive agencies too much power.
The Beehive State joins a growing wave of defiance aimed at Washington, D.C.
Mississippi's prisons are falling apart, run by gangs, and riddled with sexual assaults, a Justice Department report says.
A federal judge in an ongoing case called the porn age-check scheme unconstitutional. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton doesn't seem to care.
Banning people under age 16 from accessing social media without parental consent "is a breathtakingly blunt instrument" for reducing potential harms, the judge writes.
Food Not Bombs activists argue that feeding the needy is core political speech, and that they don't need the city's permission to do it.
Plus: A listener asks if libertarians are too obsessed with economic growth.
Undocumented immigrants aren’t the same as an invading army, but the Texas governor keeps acting like they are.
The Supreme Court judges Eighth Amendment cases with "evolving standards of decency." Some conservative jurists don't like it.
The weird story of Victor Berger, the Espionage Act, and "Shoeless" Joe Jackson.
On Thursday, a federal appeals court will hear about the FBI's "blatant scheme to circumvent" the Fourth Amendment.
The 4th Circuit’s rejection of Maryland’s handgun licensing system suggests similar schemes in other states are unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court will consider whether federal agencies’ administrative judges violate the Seventh Amendment.
The U.S. Supreme Court keeps putting off deciding whether to take up a challenge to New York's rent control scheme.
Joshua Garton spent nearly two weeks in jail for "manufacturing and disseminating a harassing photograph on social media." A First Amendment lawsuit quickly followed.
School officials in three states are effectively immune from lawsuits over excessive corporal punishment. A Louisiana mother is asking the Supreme Court to step in.
What Swift v. Tyson has to say to The Slaughter-House Cases
The Golden State's new rules—which Pennsylvania's Environmental Quality Board opted to copy—will increase the cost of a new truck by about one-third.
Mississippi only gives property owners 10 days to challenge a blight finding that could lead to their house being seized through eminent domain.
Why Article I's residence requirement applies to appointees.
The residence question is closer than it might appear.
The judge ruled that the law was unconstitutionally overbroad, vague, and viewpoint discrimination.
The judge ruled that drag performances are not inherently expressive and that schools could regulate "vulgar and lewd" conduct.
A long history of amending resolutions with legal effect.
The Nixon administration did everything it could to curb antiwar activism. Then the courts said it had gone too far.
Preferential college admissions violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
Politicians are throwing laws at the wall and seeing what sticks.
Plus: FIRE fights college's vague "greater good" policy, Biden administration pushes double talk on tariffs, and more...
The guidelines would ignore decades of academic findings about how firm concentration can have a positive impact on consumers' welfare.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10