Last Night's Presidential Debate Was Refreshingly Strange and Earnest
Chase Oliver, Jill Stein, and Randal Terry fiercely debated whether the government should get much smaller, much larger, or much holier.
Chase Oliver, Jill Stein, and Randal Terry fiercely debated whether the government should get much smaller, much larger, or much holier.
How U.S. presidents habitually use—and abuse—pronouns to deceive.
Daniel Horwitz often represents people illegally silenced by the government. This time he says a court violated his First Amendment rights when it gagged him from publicly speaking about a troubled state prison.
Randy Barnett developed an influential form of constitutional originalism.
Kevin Fair fell behind on his property taxes in 2014. The local government eventually gave a private investor the deed to his home.
After the crackdown on anarchists died down, it became more difficult to imagine anyone could go to jail in America solely for political heresy.
The Institute for Justice says Indianapolis police and prosecutors are exploiting one of the biggest FedEx hubs in the U.S. to seize cash for alleged crimes they never explain.
Thus far, the courts have barred Curtrina Martin from asking a jury for damages. She is appealing to the Supreme Court.
While the former congressman cares a lot about war powers, he has often flip-flopped on actually enforcing Congress’ red lines.
The Supreme Court created, then gutted, a right to sue federal agents for civil rights violations.
Libertarian legal giant Randy Barnett on his epic Supreme Court battles, the Federalist Society, and watching movies with Murray Rothbard.
Recent actions by the FTC show that its officers should review the Constitution.
How legislators learned to stop worrying about the constitutionality of federal drug and gun laws by abusing the Commerce Clause.
Nordlinger's questions and my answers covered a wide range of topics on law, public policy, and more.
"In short, 'cruel and unusual' is not the same as 'harmful and unfair,'" the court wrote.
How legislators learned to stop worrying about the constitutionality of federal drug and gun laws by abusing the Commerce Clause
Officers should have known that handcuffing a compliant 10-year-old is unnecessary, the court ruled.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the Supreme Court ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy "a power grab." She's right, but in the wrong way.
There is a great deal of panic surrounding the "extreme" nature of the current Court. But that is often not based in reality.
Chevron deference, a doctrine created by the Court in 1984, gives federal agencies wide latitude in interpreting the meaning of various laws. But the justices may overturn that.
Numerous federal appeals courts have ruled that filming police is protected under the First Amendment, but police continue to illegally arrest people for it.
Phoenix police are trained that "deescalation" means overwhelming and immediate force, whether or not it's necessary.
The ACLU, another polarizing organization, was willing to defend the NRA in court. That should tell you that some things aren't partisan.
The Sixth Amendment was originally seen as vital to preserving liberty. Yet it has been consistently watered down.
Judge Carlton Reeves ripped apart the legal doctrine in his latest decision on the matter.
Prosecutor Ralph Petty was also employed as a law clerk—by the same judges he argued before.
Why originalist criticisms of Dobbs often misfire, and why criticisms *of* Dobbs's originalism often misfire too.
Hoover’s reign at the FBI compromised American civil liberties and turned the FBI into America's secret police.
The cars of two Alabama women were seized for more than a year before courts found they were innocent owners. The Supreme Court says they had no constitutional right to a preliminary hearing.
Christian McGhee is suing, arguing a North Carolina assistant principal infringed on his free speech rights.
With 54 out of 60 seats in Congress, President Nayib Bukele’s party holds significant influence over legislative decisions.
The Supreme Court will decide whether former presidents can avoid criminal prosecution by avoiding impeachment and removal.
Columbia law professor David Pozen recalls the controversy provoked by early anti-drug laws and the hope inspired by subsequent legal assaults on prohibition.
There are many pervasive myths about the U.S. tax code. Here are a few.
The push to regulate social media content infringes on rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
Joe Biden is the latest of a string of presidents to deny Congress its rightful role in war making.
Michael Garrett and other Texas inmates get less than four hours of sleep a night. He argues it's cruel and unusual punishment.
The Institute for Justice says its data show that a century-old Supreme Court doctrine created a huge exception to the Fourth Amendment.
Kristy Kay Money and Rolf Jacob Sraubhaar are now suing the city of San Marcos, Texas, saying they're being forced to keep a Klan-linked symbol on the front of their house is a physical taking.
New Jersey fishermen are challenging a 40-year-old precedent that gives executive agencies too much power.
The Beehive State joins a growing wave of defiance aimed at Washington, D.C.
Mississippi's prisons are falling apart, run by gangs, and riddled with sexual assaults, a Justice Department report says.
A federal judge in an ongoing case called the porn age-check scheme unconstitutional. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton doesn't seem to care.
Banning people under age 16 from accessing social media without parental consent "is a breathtakingly blunt instrument" for reducing potential harms, the judge writes.
Food Not Bombs activists argue that feeding the needy is core political speech, and that they don't need the city's permission to do it.
Plus: A listener asks if libertarians are too obsessed with economic growth.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10