Federal Appeals Court Says Texas Inmate's Decade-Long Lawsuit Over Sleep Deprivation Can Keep Going
Michael Garrett and other Texas inmates get less than four hours of sleep a night. He argues it's cruel and unusual punishment.
Michael Garrett and other Texas inmates get less than four hours of sleep a night. He argues it's cruel and unusual punishment.
The Institute for Justice says its data show that a century-old Supreme Court doctrine created a huge exception to the Fourth Amendment.
Kristy Kay Money and Rolf Jacob Sraubhaar are now suing the city of San Marcos, Texas, saying they're being forced to keep a Klan-linked symbol on the front of their house is a physical taking.
New Jersey fishermen are challenging a 40-year-old precedent that gives executive agencies too much power.
The Beehive State joins a growing wave of defiance aimed at Washington, D.C.
Mississippi's prisons are falling apart, run by gangs, and riddled with sexual assaults, a Justice Department report says.
A federal judge in an ongoing case called the porn age-check scheme unconstitutional. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton doesn't seem to care.
Banning people under age 16 from accessing social media without parental consent "is a breathtakingly blunt instrument" for reducing potential harms, the judge writes.
Food Not Bombs activists argue that feeding the needy is core political speech, and that they don't need the city's permission to do it.
Plus: A listener asks if libertarians are too obsessed with economic growth.
Undocumented immigrants aren’t the same as an invading army, but the Texas governor keeps acting like they are.
The Supreme Court judges Eighth Amendment cases with "evolving standards of decency." Some conservative jurists don't like it.
The weird story of Victor Berger, the Espionage Act, and "Shoeless" Joe Jackson.
On Thursday, a federal appeals court will hear about the FBI's "blatant scheme to circumvent" the Fourth Amendment.
The 4th Circuit’s rejection of Maryland’s handgun licensing system suggests similar schemes in other states are unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court will consider whether federal agencies’ administrative judges violate the Seventh Amendment.
The U.S. Supreme Court keeps putting off deciding whether to take up a challenge to New York's rent control scheme.
Joshua Garton spent nearly two weeks in jail for "manufacturing and disseminating a harassing photograph on social media." A First Amendment lawsuit quickly followed.
School officials in three states are effectively immune from lawsuits over excessive corporal punishment. A Louisiana mother is asking the Supreme Court to step in.
What Swift v. Tyson has to say to The Slaughter-House Cases
The Golden State's new rules—which Pennsylvania's Environmental Quality Board opted to copy—will increase the cost of a new truck by about one-third.
Mississippi only gives property owners 10 days to challenge a blight finding that could lead to their house being seized through eminent domain.
Why Article I's residence requirement applies to appointees.
The residence question is closer than it might appear.
The judge ruled that the law was unconstitutionally overbroad, vague, and viewpoint discrimination.
The judge ruled that drag performances are not inherently expressive and that schools could regulate "vulgar and lewd" conduct.
A long history of amending resolutions with legal effect.
The Nixon administration did everything it could to curb antiwar activism. Then the courts said it had gone too far.
Preferential college admissions violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
Politicians are throwing laws at the wall and seeing what sticks.
Plus: FIRE fights college's vague "greater good" policy, Biden administration pushes double talk on tariffs, and more...
The guidelines would ignore decades of academic findings about how firm concentration can have a positive impact on consumers' welfare.
How Florida prison officials let a man's prostate cancer progress until he was paralyzed and terminally ill.
Promoting impunity for violating rights as a policy tool? What could go wrong?
Civil forfeiture is a highly unaccountable practice. The justices have the opportunity to make it a bit less so.
The appeals court judge argued that the Israeli Supreme Court had usurped the role of legislators.
Presenters include Kermit Roosevelt (UPenn), Samantha Barbas (U. of Buffalo), Michael Mannheimer (Northern Kentucky Univ.), and myself.
The decision reverses a terrible previous decision by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Chief Justice John Roberts decisively rejected the independent state legislature theory.
Plus: A rundown of recent nonsensical proposals for constitutional amendments
California’s governor insists his “28th Amendment” would leave the right to arms “intact.”
Plus: Flaws in studies linking teen social media use to depression, debt ceiling deal passes Senate, and more...
Plus: Americans are increasingly changing religions, court pauses rejection of "free" preventative care mandate, and more...
He either doesn't understand or won't admit why this violates the First Amendment.
Baby Ninth Amendments, by Anthony Sanders
(You don't really have to shut up, but here's my money.)
Yes, I'll donate to Reason right now! I'll keep my money today, thanksReason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksHelp Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksReason is the antidote to the same old stale take on ideas that actually matter to me.
I’ll support Free Minds and Free Markets! Not interestedReason pushes me to think critically with facts and analysis that shape my perspective and amplify the ideas I care about.
I want to make a donation so that my voice can be heard! Not todayEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedIt’s hard to trust the media these days, especially when everyone is pushing a partisan agenda. Reason stands for my right to make my own choices.
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No, I’ll follow the partisan herdReason’s fearless, principled journalism keeps me sane in a crazy world.
Making a donation to Reason right now will keep me from losing my mind! No, I like being madSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksSupport the voices that advocate for your freedom. Donate to Reason today!
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today