National Divorce? A Soho Forum Debate
Is breaking up the U.S. a good idea? Law professor F.H. Buckley and Libertarian Party activist Jonathan Casey debate.
Is breaking up the U.S. a good idea? Law professor F.H. Buckley and Libertarian Party activist Jonathan Casey debate.
Plus: the editors field a listener question on intellectual property.
The Supreme Court’s newest member weighs in on the meaning of Section 230 in Gonzalez v. Google.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion of the decentralized protocol Nostr with NVK, Damus app creator Will Casarin, Nick Gillespie, and Zach Weissmueller.
An escalator in a subway station is considered a "component" but a fire suppression system in the same station is considered a "finished product." Why? Because the bureaucrats say so.
Let Augustus Gloop be fat.
After a tragic on-set accident, a district attorney used a law passed after the incident to threaten Baldwin with years in jail.
A Netflix documentary series blames the SEC for missing the Ponzi scheme and then calls for giving the SEC more power.
Politicians in Syria, Turkey, and the United States are getting in the way of relief efforts.
"I was born in Cuba, and it doesn't sound good when people are trying to achieve equal outcomes for everyone," said one parent.
Plus: The National Endowment for Democracy ends funding of conservative media blacklist, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear major internet free speech case, and more...
Just consider the policies that the Founding Fathers embraced.
The social media site slapped a warning on a column in which I criticized the CDC for exaggerating the evidence supporting mask mandates.
While the office was created with "modest authority and limited responsibilities," the modern president has increasingly unchecked power and authority.
People can never be made incorruptible. We can, however, design governmental systems filled with checks and balances that limit the temptations.
Global hunger declined for decades before pandemic policies and Russia’s invasion broke the world.
Section 230 helped the internet flourish. Now its scope is under scrutiny.
News of politicians, police, and bureaucrats behaving badly from around the world.
A favela in southern Brazil shows the upside of an "invasive" urban form—and offers lessons for U.S. housing policy.
The L.A. City Council saw a good thing happening and decided government wasn't involved enough.
Erasing sincere disagreement doesn't make it go away.
War by Other Means tells the story of those conscientious objectors who did not cooperate with the government's alternative-service schemes.
Hosts and producers privately called Trump lawyer Sidney Powell's claims "complete bs," "insane," and "unbelievably offensive."
Like California’s ruinous A.B. 5, the proposal would greatly harm freelance employment.
Reason talks with the transgender historian who used the term to describe a revolutionary gender-affirming treatment for teens.
Reason reported in 2020 on allegations of fatal medical neglect inside two federal women's prisons. The Bureau of Prisons heavily redacted reports that would show if women died of inadequate care.
"This is a fundamental statement of morality, of what's right and wrong," Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro said Thursday. "And I believe Pennsylvania must be on the right side of this issue."
Brokers will have to report every trade and the trader’s personal information.
Plus: Did the Pentagon shoot down a hobby radio balloon?, Kentucky abortion ban can be enforced, and more...
Companies who embrace political agendas to please some of their employees or customers risk alienating others.
Elon Musk’s shambolic takeover may not have been great for Twitter, but it was fantastic for Mastodon.
Jacob Grier and Brett Adams help aspiring home bartenders build a bar via a carefully sequenced collection of about two dozen bottles.
In an open letter, they condemned the paper's coverage of trans issues. But their note is more about what questions journalists are not allowed to ask.
Most independent contractors don’t want the PRO Act anyway.
As legislators refuse to act, benefits will be cut without any possibility of sheltering those seniors who are poor.
"Today's decision is a victory for the First Amendment that should be celebrated by everyone who hopes to see the internet continue as a place where even difficult and contentious issues can be debated and discussed freely," said one attorney.
When COVID-19 and the U.S. government stopped kids from seeing each other, social media was their lifeline.
Chair Lina Khan has flouted the rule of law and due process, Commissioner Christine Wilson wrote.
The president reaped political benefits with his pre-election proclamation but has yet to follow through.
Plus: Age verification for social media, a bill to ban cannabis "gatherings," and more...
Gonzalez v. Google presents the Supreme Court’s first opportunity to weigh in on Section 230.
Americans are increasingly buying electric cars. Electrochemists and their innovations will drive down the cost of powering them.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks