Brett Kavanaugh Fans Try to Attack His Accuser, Go After the Wrong Christine Ford
The perils of poorly sourced stories
The perils of poorly sourced stories
Online platforms will be subjected to a costly, easily-abused system that will likely pull down legal content.
Bill also calls for holding forum moderators legally liable for extreme speech.
"Brett Kavanaugh said he would kill Roe v. Wade last week." Except he didn't.
Demands for government oversight hide opportunism amid rhetoric about safety.
Critiquing an ex-president's warnings about anti-media rhetoric, non-voting, and unelected bureaucrats
Rand Paul betrays his civil libertarian principles when he calls for using junk science to ferret out disloyalty.
AI could boost economic growth by 1.2 percent annually between now and 2030.
Conspiracy theorist banned for "abusive behavior."
Implausible estimates of benefits or risks associated with diet reflect almost exclusively the magnitude of nutrition researchers' cumulative biases.
The Department of Justice plans to look into whether social media platforms are "hurting competition and intentionally stifling the free exchange of ideas."
Tom Cotton to Jack Dorsey: "Do you prefer to see America remain the world's dominant global superpower?"
Draft legislation would force tech companies to compromise encryption at the government's demand.
Before demanding censure or intervention, take a step back from the Twitter machine and ask yourself whether anyone really cares about this stuff.
The urge to suppress runs up against targets which have no form, shape, or fixed location, and can be infinitely reproduced.
Cody Wilson's attorney talks guns, speech, and "Lochner-izing the First Amendment."
Plus: "Sheriff Joe" Arpaio faces voters again, states go after sexual-assault NDAs, and Louisiana florists fight licensing exams.
Should we be concerned about a new system to keep track of real vs. fake news?
Is another bureaucracy really going to solve the problem?
The National Constitution Center summarizes contributions to the ongoing debate over the constitutionality of the Space Force - including a new Congressional Research Service report on the subject.
The House majority leader doesn't understand how Twitter works.
Plus: digital privacy concerns down 11 percent since 2015
The tech visionary makes the case that today's online giants will be massively disrupted because we'll tire of their walled gardens.
Adam Winger used city credit cards to buy hundreds of gift cards, which he then used for in-app purchases.
The language police have come for the space geeks.
The issue was recently raised by legal scholar Michael Dorf, and goes back to earlier debates about whether originalism implies that the Air Force is unconstitutional.
The conspiracy theorist's account has been restricted for seven days.
From the alt-right to Twitter deactivation, bands drinking booze to presidents crowing for cronyism, we'll hash it out on Sirius XM Insight channel 121 today from 9-12 ET
To assume that governments do better at keeping currencies stable ignores parts of the world.
Should libertarians cheer, boo, or do a shrug-emoji when a private social media platform bans the likes of Alex Jones?
It's implausible to imagine a future in which liberal activists don't demand that right-of-center groups be de-platformed.
A new military service focused on space would be a burden on both taxpayers and the private space industry.
The classical liberal group accuses Facebook of bias.
Alex Jones tweeted "When they try to ban you, but you keep on winning" above a celebratory glass of champagne.
No one will miss Infowars, but that's beside the point.
Officials trying to stop people from sharing information online are still raging against Napster.
Facebook, YouTube, Spotify, and Apple accuse him of violating their platforms' speech codes.
The podcast crew takes on the The New York Times' controversial new hire, Trump's trade war escalations, Medicare-for-all, and 3D-printed guns.
One of the world's top skeptics of religion casts a cold eye on secular attempts to create utopia and immortality.
It's never been illegal to make your own firearms.
Did the settlement with the distributor of home gun-making hardware and software remove computer files from the United States Munitions List or just temporarily stop treating them as affected munitions?
They are years away (if ever) from becoming the choice of bad guys, who can already make untraceable weapons, so why all the fear-mongering?
The platform is struggling to handle contradictory laws about legal and illegal use of pot
White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders touts President Trump's support for printed gun bans.
The government's decision to settle a lawsuit with Defense Distributed doesn't change anything significant. It's not Trump's fault. And the underlying case was as much about free speech as it was about guns.
If you were planning to attend an anti-right rally in D.C. next week, we've got some awkward news for you.
The Pentagon can't create an entirely new branch of the military on its own. But it's moving forward where it can.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks