Supreme Court Rules Against the Revised CDC Eviction Moratorium
This outcome was widely expected by legal commentators.
This outcome was widely expected by legal commentators.
Horror filmmaking has always been political, but the new Candyman takes it to a different level.
"Government should be very small. It should just regulate the minimum."
The Michigan congresswoman is a co-sponsor of a bill that would suspend all tenants' obligation to pay rent through April 2022.
ASU loses, even though the defendant “stopped participating in this action after his answer was stricken” “for litigation misconduct”: “[A]a reasonably prudent consumer would not be deceived or confused into believing that ASU was the ‘source or origin’ of the posts and messages emanating from the ‘asu_covid.parties.’”
Interviewer Joe Selvaggi and I explore the constitutional and policy issues at stake.
The ID overhaul, presented as a national security safeguard more than 15 years ago, still hasn't been fully implemented.
Setting aside the harassment claims and the nursing home debacle, the Cuomo administration’s inability to run a minimally functional rent relief program should forever end his reputation as a competent executive.
Jigisha Modi can't hire her own mother-in-law—who has decades of eyebrow-threading experience—because of Kansas' occupational licensing rules. Now she's suing.
The new eviction moratorium applies to the 90 percent of counties in the U.S. where the spread of COVID-19 is "substantial" or "high."
Thanks to the Supreme Court's decision in the Cedar Point case, this suit has much better odds of success than previous takings challenges to eviction moratoria.
It still covers some 90% of the country, and still rests on a theory of virtually limitless CDC authority. Even President Biden acknowledges the order is legally dubious.
An onslaught of antitrust and data-security crackdowns have threatened the country's biggest ride-sharing platforms, cryptocurrency exchanges, and messaging services.
Do we really need the state to step in over an unfortunate tragedy?
A new lawsuit from landlords argues that the CDC's eviction moratorium was a taking, and that they're entitled to compensation.
Circuit Judge John K. Bush accuses the federal government of laying claim to "near-dictatorial powers."
Today's antitrust activists forget that big companies with significant market share come and go.
The ruling is unsurprising. But it does further strengthen the case against the moratorium, and increases the odds the issue might eventually make it to the Supreme Court.
The Sixth Circuit's decision is at odds with that of the D.C. Circuit, and features a Judge Thapar concurrence on delegation.
New empirical research suggests the answer is yes.
The city approved developers' plans for a 10-unit complex. They built 29 homes instead. Now some of those illegal units could have to be dismantled.
The decision is based on the conclusion that the landlords failed to prove they suffered an "irreparable" injury. It upholds a trial court ruling denying a preliminary injunction to landlords challenging the moratorium.
Don't let naysayers fool you. Richard Branson's space flight is a boon for society.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board rejects the mark “Nigga” for clothing, because it’s so commonly used by others that it doesn’t serve to identify the applicant’s products (logic that equally applies to "Team Jesus," "Texas Love," and "God Bless the USA").
Plus: Treating social media platforms as common carriers, Norway criminalizes sneaky influencer editing, and more...
Ending single-family zoning doesn't ban single-family homes from neighborhoods. It merely allows more freedom for people to build what they want.
Governments at the state, local, and federal levels can obstruct our pursuit of happiness and at times even jeopardize our safety.
Federal Judge David O. Carter says Los Angeles' “inaction" is "so egregious, and the state so nonfunctional" that it's likely "in violation of the Equal Protection Clause."
It's the second in a two-part series on eminent domain reform.
Congress approved $25 Billion in emergency rental assistance in December. Only 6 percent of that money has been spent so far.
The general assumption that the Fifth Amendment bars takings for economic development purposes rests on shaky ground.
It's an indication that the notorious decision holding that the government can take property for private "economic development" may be vulnerable.
A measure awaiting the governor's signature would make it easier for natural hair braiders in Wisconsin to work.
The controversial 2005 case "strayed from the Constitution," say Thomas and Gorsuch.
The government and media relied on studies plagued by shoddy statistics to make the case for blocking evictions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Brett Kavanaugh, who provided a crucial fifth vote, said he agrees that the CDC does not have the authority to override rental contracts.
The agency’s legal defense of its eviction moratorium implies that it has vast powers to order Americans around.
A majority refused to lift a stay of a district court injunction against the order, but five justices indicated they believe the order is illegal.
The Court's ruling in PennEast allows the federal government to delegate the power of eminent domain to private firms seeking to condemn state-owned property.
More and more cities have taken preliminary steps toward allowing "missing middle" housing options in once exclusive single-family neighborhoods, but the devil is in the details.
The Texas governor wants to keep incoming migrants out at all costs. But those costs are insurmountable.
A bipartisan bill in Congress seeks to get the FDA out of the premium cigar industry.
Plus: Retaliatory action in Syria, developments with the delta variant, Clarence Thomas on marijuana, and more...
Taken together, these six measures would have a major impact on the way we shop, chat, and otherwise go about our business online.
A North Carolina city council member wants to make feeding homeless people a misdemeanor.
San Francisco politicians are raising eyebrows at the high costs of an emergency program that provides secure camping sites to the city's homeless.
The federal government's ban on the removal of non-paying tenants was supposed to expire on June 30. It'll now run through July 31.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10