Lindsey Graham Reveals His Utter Hypocrisy on Impeachment
After complaining about a lack of transparency, the senator declared that he will not read any impeachment transcripts.
After complaining about a lack of transparency, the senator declared that he will not read any impeachment transcripts.
Some 76 percent of Texas voters approved a constitutional amendment that prohibits the state from imposing any income tax.
A state law allows counties to effectively steal homes over unpaid taxes and keep the excess revenue for their own budgets.
His desperate attempt to stop a grand jury from seeing his tax returns invokes kingly powers that would put the president above the law.
Gordon Sondland said he now remembers conveying that military aid would be withheld until Ukrainian President Zelenskiy complied with Trump's demands.
People need to stop blaming their problems on Facebook and Twitter.
"Let me just say that I think that American elections should be for Americans to decide," said Marie Yovanovitch.
Plus: Intent "doesn't matter" on social media?, an interesting productivity experiment, prostitution arrests, PragerU's lawsuit, internet access progress, and more...
Plus: Trump well-poised in battleground states in 2020, the return of "covfefe," and more...
If, at the end of all this, President Mike Pence sits behind the Resolute desk in the Oval Office, what has been accomplished?
The ruling is a continuation of the same case in which the federal Supreme Court ruled that the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is "incorporated" against state governments and applies to asset forfeitures.
Why Congress should abolish the ethanol mandate.
Plus: Reno versus strip clubs, the Constitution on polyamory, an Alabama abortion ruling, and more...
Clear your calendars for the rest of the election.
The senator took a lot of heat five years ago for being anti-interventionist in Syria yet pro-war against ISIS.
How the FDA lost, and gained, jurisdiction over cigarettes -- to a Newfoundland fishing-boat tune
Progressive purity tests and Supreme Court wish lists
An amicus filing in the case challenging the Emergency Declaration's diversion of funds towards building the Wall
Plus: Fentantyl is used in almost 40 percent of overdose deaths, and the Russia leaks continue.
Where does Congress get the authority to redundantly criminalize abuse of mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles?
Who will rein in the ever-expanding administrative state?
Another show trial for Facebook's beleaguered CEO
Plus: Involuntary commitment and "Indian-made" laws scrutinized, unconstitutional copyright bill passes, stranger danger panic, and more...
Remnants of Prohibition-era policies continue to frustrate brewers.
An old argument against "flexible and changeable interpretation."
The Supreme Court will consider a constitutional challenge to the composition of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
For once, the Trump administration is on the right side of a debate with Congress over trade.
There are stories of marijuana business owners showing up at California's tax agency offices with trash bags filled with cash, even though the agency generally doesn't allow cash payments.
Democratic legislators ignore the tremendous harm-reducing potential of smoke-free nicotine delivery.
A change in Tennessee’s definition of a firearm allows for felons to own a gun provided it was manufactured before 1899.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal would give journalists special federal protections that they don't need.
After senators sent threatening letters to Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe, the companies "decided" not to sign on to the online payment system.
Plus: Trump murder meme makes waves, California requires abortion pill at public universities, and more...
The decision is the first to address the legality of using the emergency declaration for this purpose. Previous wall cases involved Trump's attempts to redirect other funds.
California's progressive political imperatives are having such glaring real-world repercussions that it's hard to keep ignoring them.
The Ukrainian president's benign interpretation of Trump's conduct is relevant to the impeachment inquiry but not dispositive.
In making the case against the House impeachment inquiry, the White House counsel relies upon a repudiated district court opinion that doesn't even support its argument.
Federal agencies evade the rulemaking process, yet still levy fines, revoke permits, and seize property via “guidance.” Trump’s orders may put a stop to this practice.
"We believe the acts revealed publicly over the past several weeks are fundamentally incompatible with the president’s oath of office, his duties as commander in chief, and his constitutional obligation to 'take care that the laws be faithfully executed.'"
Thirteen legal scholars weigh in, including the VC's Keith Whittington and myself.
Parents in Canada seek damages and refunds for their children's in-game purchases.
Understanding what’s at stake in Ramos v. Louisiana.