Would These 4 Gun Controls Prevent Mass Shootings?
An analysis of such crimes suggests the president’s policy prescriptions are unlikely to have a meaningful impact.
An analysis of such crimes suggests the president’s policy prescriptions are unlikely to have a meaningful impact.
The justices hear fewer cases and decide fewer questions than they used to.
Former prosecutors Markus Funk and Andrew S. Boutros, and Judge Virginia Kendall, delve further into this fascinating question.
"When those charges are brought, these people are guilty," Lightfoot said.
Can a web designer be compelled under the First Amendment to host wedding pictures?
Presidents once treated congressional authorization as a requirement for the U.S. to enter conflicts. What went wrong?
"[P]olitics has no place in Kentucky's public pensions.... '[S]takeholder capitalism' and 'environmental, social, and governance' investment practices that introduce mixed motivations to investment decisions are inconsistent with Kentucky law governing fiduciary duties owed by investment management firms to Kentucky's public pension plans."
The president's argument is amazing for its tone-deafness, inconsistent thinking, and sheer economic ignorance.
The federal bailout of state and local governments padded the paychecks of many public employees.
It signals that many in Congress still condemn America's role in the war and actions from the president that lack proper authorization.
We will get opinions on Monday, but the Court will have to average more than two opinions per day to finish before July 4.
Because there is no reliable way to identify future mass shooters, it is inevitable that many innocent people will lose their Second Amendment rights.
Heard won $2 million on one of her counterclaims.
The appellate court also rejected the trial court's reliance on the 8-year-old child's "unsubstantiated" allegations of abuse.
Insects aren't a category protected by the California Endangered Species Act. So state officials classified four bumblebee species as fish to get them listed.
The judicial conference endorses making PACER searches free for non-commercial users.
Plus: Who's bringing fentanyl across the border? Will Austin become a sanctuary city for abortion? And more...
With thirty-three opinions in argued cases yet to issue, the Supreme Court is well behind the usual pace.
The ruling is not as ridiculous as it sounds. But it's still a fishy decision!
A state court rules that bumble bees may qualify as "fish" under the California Endangered Species Act
Plus: Libertarian Party changes abortion and bigotry planks, the FDA's weird rejection of fluvoxamine for treating COVID-19, and more...
How should we think about slippery slope arguments, whether they come from liberals or conservatives or libertarians or anyone else?
Newly confirmed Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has a good track record on cases involving qualified immunity.
A crack theft leads to alleged attempted rape and the shooting of the drug dealers / alleged attempted rapist.
Lawmakers stuffed more than $8 billion in pet projects into an omnibus federal spending bill passed in March. But wait, didn't Congress ban earmarks back in 2011?
Among other things, the investigator "appeared to accept Father’s explanation that his 2003 kidnapping conviction based on allegations of domestic violence in a previous relationship was a misunderstanding, not the result of criminal conduct," "[finding] 'credible' Father’s explanation that he 'was unfairly incarcerated based on the lies of the victim and because of the racist justice system.'"
The Parkers filed their lawsuit under Maine’s new ‘right-to-food’ constitutional amendment.
so long as the court makes the decision for secular reasons.
Pretty obvious, I think, but helpful to see a specific case on the subject.
Without opinion the justices rejected Louisiana's application to vacate a lower court stay.
A federal lawsuit argues that the department's regulations violate due process, the separation of powers, and the First Amendment.
Congress has radically restricted the number of pilots without doing anything to increase safety.
And one or the other is likely our fate too.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks