Did Sweden Accidentally Blunder into COVID-19 Herd Immunity?
If so, that could be really good news for the rest of the world.
If so, that could be really good news for the rest of the world.
Both major parties defend the Constitution only when it's convenient.
That scenario seems highly implausible based on what we know about the epidemic.
The trend means we should see declining daily deaths in the coming weeks.
Will his blunt self-aggrandizement reinvigorate concerns about presidents who exceed their powers?
The former New York Times SCOTUS reporter does not seem to understand the arguments she is criticizing.
The wide range of estimates reflects real variations as well as methodological differences.
About 40 percent of infected persons show no symptoms but may still transmit disease.
Whitmer's argument is short on facts and legal reasoning.
Cases per 1,000 tests are rising in the majority of states.
Cheap, rapid antigen tests may be on the way—and the FDA has finally approved test pooling.
Meanwhile, the case fatality rate is still falling.
Antibodies may decline, but T-cells could provide effective long-term protection.
We are starting to see the fatal consequences of the recent infection surge.
The paper's claim reflects the same arbitrary distinction between religious and secular activities that churches are challenging in court.
Enable people to act responsibly toward their neighbors and co-workers.
Expanded testing, a younger mix of patients, and improved treatment help explain the seemingly contradictory trends.
Stanford epidemiological model predicts self-flattening while MIT forecasts continued epidemic growth.
If the findings are true, that's really great news.
COVID-19 control measures violate the First Amendment when they arbitrarily favor secular conduct.
Trends in Massachusetts highlight the importance of voluntary changes in behavior.
The evidence suggests Americans are right to wonder.
It could quickly amplify coronavirus testing by tenfold.
The difference implies that the virus is much less deadly than it looks, but it also makes contact tracing a daunting challenge.
U.S. District Judge Gary Sharpe finds that the state's COVID-19 control measures arbitrarily discriminate against religious conduct.
The trend, which may reflect growing defiance of social distancing in some age groups, implies a lower death rate.
The downward trend continued after states began lifting their lockdowns.
New infections are down nationwide but rising in some places as people rebel against government-recommended precautions.
The decision says the "unbridled and unfettered consolidation of authority in one unelected official" violates due process and the separation of powers.
Airborne transmission is the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19.
"My mask protects you, your mask protects me"
The episode illustrates the perils of confirmation bias on both sides of the debate about disease control measures.
Two models suggest that broad restrictions had less impact on the epidemic than commonly thought.
As SCOTUS declines to issue an injunction, the chief justice says the state's COVID-19 control measures seem consistent with the First Amendment.
Making cheap tests widely available would go a long way toward crushing the pandemic.
Two models generate strikingly different estimates.
Supreme Court precedent suggests COVID-19 restrictions that discriminate against churches are presumptively unconstitutional.
Control measures should be based on emerging evidence about the danger posed by the virus.
That rate is much lower than the numbers used in the horrifying projections that shaped the government response to the epidemic.
All of it, The New York Times assumes.
Studies from several countries find low infection rates.
The disease control agency is a poster child for bureaucratic incompetence.
The ruling says the state's top health official exceeded her statutory authority by ordering "nonessential" businesses to close.
When mask-wearing and social distancing rules are legally enforceable, the potential for violence cannot be avoided.
Courts are beginning to recognize that public health powers, while broad, are not a blank check.
The president is always in her prayers.
Stocks rise steeply on good news about mRNA vaccines.
The infection fatality rate probably varies from one place to another.