ACLU Study Finds Obama-Era Restrictions Failed To Slow Flow of Military Gear to Police
The study comes as House Democrats press to completely abolish the Pentagon program.
The study comes as House Democrats press to completely abolish the Pentagon program.
By playing with definitions, the military is able to keep more troops in Afghanistan than it publicly reports.
Civilian control over the military still matters.
Auditors now say the military may be able to pass an audit before the end of the next decade, so at least that's something.
Let’s not let fears of “Trump loyalists” overshadow positive outcomes.
If we can't trim the Pentagon's budget this year, will we ever?
Plus: House votes to keep funding the government, DHS recalls intelligence reports, Jeff Bezos is starting a preschool, and more...
That includes 1,114 armored personnel carriers.
The horses used to belong to the Air Force, which makes only slightly more sense.
Empty displays of ritual militarism are always a waste of time, money, and goodwill, but especially during a pandemic.
The coronavirus pandemic should certainly occasion more prudence at the Pentagon in strategy and spending alike.
Glenn Fine was abruptly removed from his post without explanation.
"Absent policy changes, the federal government continues to face an unsustainable long-term fiscal path," America's top auditor warns. But is anyone listening?
The administration also plans to move $2.2 billion originally earmarked for purchasing vehicles, ships, and aircraft to cover wall construction costs.
Civilian deaths are also on the rise, and it's increasingly obvious that there is no clear strategy for the U.S. to "win" its longest military conflict.
Plus: encryption battles, the Nordic equality myth, and more...
That horse has left the barn.
Despite the failure, Pentagon officials are spinning the audit as a step in the right direction.
The mishandling of the Syrian withdrawal appears to have created less stability in Syria and considerably weakened Trump's ability to dictate foreign policy—a situation where actually bringing the troops home now seems even more farfetched.
If Trump wants credit for ending wars in the Middle East, he'll have to actually reduce the number of Americans deployed there.
Plus: Thousands of troops leaving Afghanistan, TV networks sue streaming site Locust, Gabbard calls Harris response "pathetic," and more...
Plus: Florida legalizes vegetable gardens, Facebook bans anti-voting ads, and more...
State-level licensing laws can make it nearly impossible for workers to move from place to place, and that's a particular problem for military spouses. This bipartisan proposal could be a step towards fixing it.
There is no military solution to be had. It's time to simply come home.
Chalk it up to use-it-or-lose-it spending.
Though a "U.S.A." chant didn't really seem to catch on.
Reason editors' best and worst moments of 2018, including the president's welcome and long-overdue drawdown from Afghanistan
Plus: United Nations goes to bat for Julian Assange and Slack censors chat with Iranians.
After announcing draw-down from Syria, the president may be seriously contemplating getting out of Afghanistan as well.
Donald Trump explains his decision to withdraw from Syria directly to the American people.
Defense budgeting should be a strategy debate, not a rubber stamp for higher spending
According to Deputy Secretary Patrick Shanahan, no one expected it to pass anyway.
Both casualties and expenses are rising.
There will be no military parade today. There shouldn't be one any other day, either.
If the Navy wants people to trust that it's taking steps to be better, less transparency isn't going to help.
Is another bureaucracy really going to solve the problem?
Trump says it's D.C. politicians' fault his military parade got postponed. But at least now we can afford more jet fighters!
Which is actually not too bad by Pentagon standards.
"It was not very hard" to get the spending bill through Congress, Trump said. And he's definitely right about that.
The Pentagon can't create an entirely new branch of the military on its own. But it's moving forward where it can.
The Senate asks the Pentagon's F-35 program to explain its sizable discrepancy in savings estimates.
Amash was one of just three House Republicans to vote against the spending bill.
Pentagon officials are dragging their feet as they begin planning the military parade ordered by President Trump.
Democrats will oppose anything Trump wants, unless it's more money for the Pentagon.
A lot of people are dying in unauthorized wars.
For any transgender person attempt to enlist, though, it's a new version of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks