New Jersey Supreme Court Requires Transparency for Facial Recognition Evidence
Prosecutors in New Jersey must disclose how the technology is used in criminal cases, the state’s Supreme Court ruled.
Prosecutors in New Jersey must disclose how the technology is used in criminal cases, the state’s Supreme Court ruled.
Its distinction between a voting recommendation "that aligns with the views of company management" and one that "recommends a vote against company management" is unconstitutionally viewpoint-based, a court holds.
The government cannot force private property owners to allow guns on their land. But the Supreme Court rightly ruled today that it also cannot impose a presumption of exclusion.
Eight of the Prairieland Detention Center protesters were sentenced to a combined 450 years in prison.
The decision means similar laws in other states likewise violate the Second Amendment, and it casts doubt on the constitutionality of location-specific gun bans that cover a lot of territory.
"This indictment appears to be going way overboard, using a sledgehammer to address what might have been some infractions."
The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Hemani could open the door to relief for cannabis consumers convicted of illegal gun possession.
Rapid transfers are cutting detainees off from their lawyers and families.
The Supreme Court could be poised to decide whether it's you or Big Tech companies.
The decision is a modest but welcome step toward rectifying the injustice of criminalizing conduct that violates no one’s rights.
Fair market value often fails to fully compensate property owners for their losses. This makes the Supreme Court's recent decision allowing compensation below fair market value even worse.
The Pung family of Isabella County, Michigan, maintained they were entitled to fair market value. The high court disagreed, but with a twist.
Even under the Supreme Court's highly elastic understanding of that clause, Thomas says, such laws do not qualify as regulation of interstate commerce.
FCC Chairman Brendan Carr is targeting the Disney-owned broadcaster with two different government enforcement actions.
Understanding the stakes of Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections.
The sci-fi scumlords GWAR have been killing presidents onstage for years, but until now they say they've never had problems with the Secret Service.
The Court ruled that local goverments may pay compensation far below fair market value for property seized in tax foreclosures.
Plus: the worst rule at the World Cup, and the worst person in golf?
How Trump rebranded the war on drugs as a fight against illegal immigration
The conservative justice continues to wage a lonely legal crusade over the Commerce Clause.
The court said the law—which would require age verification for everyone—constitutes only a “marginal burden” and "does not raise meaningful concerns about muting valuable protected discourse."
The case is mostly about photography restrictions and false arrest, but the defendants also allegedly "discussed playing Disney music during public meetings to prevent Flash—through copyright restrictions—from monetizing his recordings."
After burning through interceptors in the Iran war, the U.S. faces a dire math problem: Enemies can build drones faster than America can build missiles.
The league’s conduct is indisputably protected by the First Amendment. But that doesn't make it wise.
The Supreme Court ruled that "an agreement not to appeal a sentence is unenforceable when it would result in a miscarriage of justice."
"Petitioner's testimony confirmed his 2017 confrontation with his parents, he had authored the Reddit posts, and he had publicly uttered racial slurs and had made statements about raping women."
Three in 10 Americans at least occasionally carry a firearm.
The unanimous decision upholding the gun rights of cannabis consumers is striking given the Supreme Court's long history of accommodating the war on drugs.
Civil rights and environmentalists vowed to keep fighting in court until the detention camp is torn down and returned to its original state.
A notable 9-0 Second Amendment decision that features three concurring opinions, all of which make good points.
A landmark win for the right to keep and bear arms in United States v. Hemani.
Law enforcement in Colorado can now inspect the records of any firearms dealer in the state "at all times" without a warrant, probable cause, or limits.
Understanding the stakes in Kian v. Florida
Richard Hershey is asking the Supreme Court to overrule a 5th Circuit decision that blocked the lawsuit provoked by that obvious First Amendment violation.
FIFA can restrict political messaging inside its stadiums, but there is no stopping English football fans from mocking their prime minister elsewhere.
Jane and I discuss whether sending a sexually explicit image of Shrek to a politician can constitute criminal harassment.
The U.K. says tech companies have three months to stop minors from sending or receiving nude images—and universal identity checks for phone users may be the only way forward.
Government agencies would have to report communications and could be sued for bullying.
The proposal was nixed only after White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf explained why it was legally dubious.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.