Free Speech and the Educational Mission
Some of the hardest free speech issues arise when a university argues that restrictions are justified by its "educational mission."
Some of the hardest free speech issues arise when a university argues that restrictions are justified by its "educational mission."
But he loses: "As a result of Godlewski's guilty plea to 'inappropriate text [m]essages' and 'contact' ..., as set forth in the Affidavit of Probable Cause quoting the offending text messages admitting and memorializing a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old minor, Godlewski is collaterally estopped from denying his participation in [the] sexual relationship ...."
The survey of over 50,000 students also found that 37 percent of students said it was "sometimes" or "always" acceptable to shout down a speaker, up from 31 percent last year.
The case is another example of stretching criminal laws to hold parents accountable for their children's violence.
An article from the Information as Medicine symposium.
claims that someone has engaged in specific conduct may be factual assertions and therefore potentially libelous.
Law students: Take that Choice of Law (often called Conflicts of Laws) course your law school offers; it can be tremendously important.
The former president's attempts to put a positive spin on the term are consistent with his alarmingly authoritarian instincts.
The Democratic nominee has favored policing online speech. Would a future Harris administration defend free expression?
The chaplain's post "discuss[ed] 'how God designed each person as male or female, and that sex is immutable'" and "stated it is unfair to allow males to compete in women's sports."
The mandate required platforms to, among other things, report to the state "how the terms of service define and address (a) hate speech or racism; (b) extremism or radicalization; (c) disinformation or misinformation; (d) harassment; and (e) foreign political interference, as well as statistics on content that was flagged by the social media company as belonging to any of the categories."
"The Community Guidelines' prohibitions of, inter alia, 'homophobia, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, racism, or any other forms of oppressive beliefs or behaviors,' 'name-calling,' and 'disrespect' are prohibitions against ideas that offend, and therefore discriminate on the basis of viewpoint in violation of the First Amendment."
The ruling concludes that the government failed to show an Illinois ban is "consistent with this Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation."
Rebekah Massie criticized a proposed pay raise for a city attorney. When she refused to stop, citing her First Amendment rights, the mayor had her arrested.
One of the functions of the First Amendment is to create a kind of arms control agreement: With respect to censorship, all sides agree to lay down their arms.
Last week’s sedition conviction is yet another step backward for press freedom.
Officials pursue an anti-liberty agenda through unofficial pressure and foreign regulators.
Plus: A listener asks the editors, when it is right to revolt to stop repeated miscarriages of justice?
Priscilla Villarreal, known as "Lagordiloca," is suing law enforcement for violating her First Amendment rights. She is appealing to the Supreme Court.
For free speech on campus, Brandeis and Holmes should guide colleges and universities.
The award consisted of $1.5M compensatory damages and $350K punitives.
The Second Amendment doesn’t protect guns; it protects the human right to self-defense.
Conforming speech policies to the First Amendment would serve private universities well, legally and otherwise.
A dissenting subgroup of the Libertarian Party of Michigan was barred from "from identifying as the Libertarian Party of Michigan in the provision of services."
Plus: Kamala Harris' big night, Japan ignores climate critics, Rio cops lose their minds, and more...
Seven congressional Democrats called on the FEC to stop deepfakes. But is there really much to worry about?
"[M]uch of [the Oregon State Bar statement's] criticism of then-President Trump did not relate to the justice system at all—for instance, it criticized Trump for describing Haiti and African countries as 'shithole countries.'"
Most states collect DNA from felony arrestees pretrial. They should need a warrant to do so.
"[O]ur history and tradition may support some limits on a presently intoxicated person's right to carry a weapon ..., but they do not support disarming a sober person based solely on past substance usage."
The court indicates the law would be constitutional so long as it does not claim to declare a federal law "invalid."
"[T]he district court’s Rule 50 ruling improperly intruded on the province of the jury by making credibility determinations, weighing evidence, and ignoring facts or inferences that a reasonable juror could plausibly have found to support Palin’s case."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10