Government To Blame for Texas Church Shooting That Left 26 Dead, Says Court
Plus: Trump's absurd lawsuits against social media, states take aim at Google app store, and more...
Plus: Trump's absurd lawsuits against social media, states take aim at Google app store, and more...
"The Second Amendment does not exist to protect only the rights of the happy few who distinguish themselves from the body of 'the people' through some 'proper cause.'"
Rhode Island, maybe New York, Wilmington (Delaware), and a few small towns are the only places in the U.S. that still forbid stun guns.
New York's new law seems to conflict with a federal statute that protects manufacturers and dealers from liability for gun crimes.
We can thank judges who were prepared to enforce constitutional limits on public health powers.
Salaythis Melvin's family says they want justice.
The fees would be used to reimburse the city for the public costs of gun violence.
It's likely that soon, almost all Americans will be legally able to carry guns.
What seems like a gun rights case actually presents some important questions of administrative law.
Cracking down on "rogue gun dealers" and enforcing background checks won't stop criminals from arming themselves.
The anti-commandeering principle serves causes favored by both the right and the left.
The Justice Department's proposal encourages states to take away people's Second Amendment rights based on little more than bare allegations.
David Chipman's obfuscation, like the president's vagueness, is aimed at concealing the illogic of targeting firearms based on their "military-style" appearance.
Rules range from absurd to appalling without respect for civil liberties or basic logic.
Biden's Justice Department has some problems with this.
State legislators across the country are working to weaken the enforcement of federal gun laws by emulating immigration activists.
Conservative states seeking to protect gun rights are copying the tactics used by liberal immigration sanctuaries.
A new decision from the Georgia Court of Appeals.
A new lawsuit challenges Minnesota's law requiring a person be at least 21 years old to carry a handgun.
Such laws arbitrarily prohibit rifles that are commonly used for legal purposes.
Victory for the Second Amendment in Miller v. Bonta. Will the Biden administration pay attention?
The announcement comes days after an exclusive report from Reason attracted national attention to the case.
Even when states authorize gun confiscation orders, identifying would-be mass shooters is a daunting challenge.
The policies don't accomplish much more than putting money in some gun owners' pockets.
Regulations might reshape DIY gun products, but they can’t eliminate the demand that created the industry.
California insists those under 21 were legally "infants" in Founding Era; plaintiffs insist they were always part of "militia"
Despite its victory, the State Department is insisting that a court order to allow the files to spread is not yet technically in effect.
Plus: Ghost guns, the unintended consequences of criminalizing sex work, and more...
Two years after California banned them, the ATF was complaining that 41 percent of guns they came across in L.A. were the very guns already banned
States had been trying to stop the Feds from loosening their hold on certain software, but the Appeals Court says they don't have that power
Under current law, marijuana users who possess firearms are committing a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison.
New York, like several other states, limits public carrying of handguns to the favored few.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments next term in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Corlett.
Montana's new law refusing to help enforce federal gun restrictions is similar to liberal "sanctuary cities'" refusal to assist in federal immigration enforcement. Both are protected by Constitution.
A new RAND analysis shows how difficult it is to answer basic questions about this rare variety of homicide.
"There's this growing gap between what's on paper and what is enforceable in law," says Kareem Shaya, the co-founder of Open Source Defense.
If you support the duty to retreat (before using deadly force), what do you think of the duty to "comply[] with a demand ... [to] abstain from performing an act"?
If small arms can’t defeat a modern military, why are the people of Myanmar so determined to fight for freedom?
But what exactly do these terms mean?
From protests to the coronavirus, it thinks it can protect you from anything.
Although police seized the perpetrator's shotgun when he was deemed suicidal, he was never identified as a potential murderer.
Both advocates and skeptics of the copycat theory recommend self-restraint by the news media.
A ban won’t stop mass shootings, but it will hinder self-defense.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10