Will and Grace Botches the Gay Wedding Cake Fight
Nobody has the right to force bakers to print speech they hate. The debate is over what counts as speech.
Nobody has the right to force bakers to print speech they hate. The debate is over what counts as speech.
Rep. Michelle DuBois wants to remove a statehouse sign that reads "General Hooker Entrance" because it is an affront to "women's dignity."
Under Stalin, people could be killed for carrying joke books about him. They did it anyway.
ACLU steps in to fight zoning regulations that appear to let officials veto art based on content.
A web developer's First Amendment lawsuit says Sibley, Iowa, officials conspired to silence him.
"Would that be allowed by the administration?"
For months, Penn Law has resisted calls to punish Amy Wax for her public comments on race. Yesterday, they caved.
"We do not do this lightly, but they have repeatedly posted content designed to incite animosity and hatred against minority groups."
Rallying to call for restrictive laws is a whole lot easier than getting people to submit to them.
Princeton University's Keith Whittington explains why it is sometimes wise -- even necessary -- to expose students to potentially offensive material
Marking the 54th anniversary of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
A lawsuit leads to a suggestion that the president engage in a kinder, gentler ignoring.
That is what students at the University of Miami School of Law are reporting. [EARLIER UPDATE: The Dean tells me that things are more complicated than at first reported, and they're trying to see if things can be worked out; I hope to have more from the Dean in a few days.] [UPDATE 3/15: The University has agreed to pay the security fee.]
It's not just the Second Amendment in their crosshairs.
Rybka has spent the past several years as a protegee of pickup artist and seduction coach Alex Lesley-and picked up a plausible claim to 2016 election dirt along the way.
A very interesting piece by Stanford Prof. Michael McConnell on the Masterpiece Cakeshop case.
Can the government prevent drug firms from telling patients true facts about the medicine they prescribe?
Device makers would be required to block porn, prostitution hubs, and all content that fails "current standards of decency."
Cody Wilson on his war against power, the irreversible course of the 3D-printed gun, and America's Weimar moment
How can a company be expected to arbitrate "fake news" when it can't even tell ancient artifacts from porn?
Mandatory fees are an assault on free association.
The charges -- for "distribution of violent images" -- could lead to up to three years in prison and a $90,000 fine.
"We wanted to capitalize on the real groundswell of support behind free speech from all walks of life."
The bill makes "promoting prostitution" a federal crime, holds websites legally liable for user-posted content, and lets states retroactively prosecute offenders.
But such a content-based tax would violate the First Amendment.
"It seems to me your argument doesn't have much weight."
John Stossel picks the best and worst political performances of the year.
The National Constitution Center invited Alicia Hickok and me to debate Janus; Ms. Hickok wrote an amicus brief supporting Janus, and I signed an amicus brief supporting the AFSCME.
He'd also like everyone to trim their hair so it doesn't touch their ears.
Yes, kooky rumors can spread quickly online. In this case, the angry reactions to those rumors may be spreading even faster.
The "information warfare" described in Friday's indictment is not an existential threat to American democracy.
The government always compels taxpayers to fund the management side of management-labor bargaining in public workplaces. Given this, why should there be a First Amendment problem with compelled funding (through agency fees as well as taxes) of both sides?
A year after fiery political protests erupted on campus, we visited to find out when students think it's OK to respond to words with violence.
Thirteen individuals and three companies accused of conspiracy against the U.S., wire fraud, and identity theft.
Here are the SCOTUS cases to watch in February.
"The change in the child's relationship with the father based on the child's fear of his displeasure if she were not a 'true Muslim,' and her belief that he threatened to abscond with her to Morocco, also contributed to the change in circumstances warranting modification" of the custody arrangement.
So holds the Ninth Circuit, in a case in which the Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic, which I run, filed an amicus brief.
And that's not copyright infringement, if they only copy short phrases, especially ones that were themselves largely copied from others.
Libertarian History/Philosophy
The ancient authoritarian imperative to restrict speech shows up in a new guise.
It's been over a year since a petition for rehearing en banc was filed and the D.C. Court of Appeals has yet to act.
Meanwhile, drunk driving and vehicular assault by officers are not firing offenses in Hudson County.
In March, I wrote about a forged court order that someone was using to try to get Google to de-index online criticism of a New Britain, Conn. community activist (and volunteer city commissioner); now, someone has asked Google to de-index my post, plus a TechDirt post on the same subject.
Co-founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Grateful Dead lyricist, helped create the notion of "cyberspace" as realm of unprecedented liberty.
This is a trial court decision, and an appeal seems likely.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.