Feds Announce Indictments of Russian Nationals for Attempting to Influence American Elections
Thirteen individuals and three companies accused of conspiracy against the U.S., wire fraud, and identity theft.
Thirteen individuals and three companies accused of conspiracy against the U.S., wire fraud, and identity theft.
Here are the SCOTUS cases to watch in February.
"The change in the child's relationship with the father based on the child's fear of his displeasure if she were not a 'true Muslim,' and her belief that he threatened to abscond with her to Morocco, also contributed to the change in circumstances warranting modification" of the custody arrangement.
So holds the Ninth Circuit, in a case in which the Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic, which I run, filed an amicus brief.
And that's not copyright infringement, if they only copy short phrases, especially ones that were themselves largely copied from others.
Libertarian History/Philosophy
The ancient authoritarian imperative to restrict speech shows up in a new guise.
It's been over a year since a petition for rehearing en banc was filed and the D.C. Court of Appeals has yet to act.
Meanwhile, drunk driving and vehicular assault by officers are not firing offenses in Hudson County.
In March, I wrote about a forged court order that someone was using to try to get Google to de-index online criticism of a New Britain, Conn. community activist (and volunteer city commissioner); now, someone has asked Google to de-index my post, plus a TechDirt post on the same subject.
Co-founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Grateful Dead lyricist, helped create the notion of "cyberspace" as realm of unprecedented liberty.
This is a trial court decision, and an appeal seems likely.
Men's Ultimate Frisbee received $15,747.78. "Brothers of Diversity received $984."
A lawsuit filed by the Indiana ACLU says yes.
"You have the other side, even on positive news, really positive news… they were like death, and un-American."
His Ghost Gunner and 3D printing are destroying the concept of gun control.
Female groups are allowed to remain "gender focused," while male groups are penalized.
First Amendment principles that offensive speech is protected "are by no means new. Yet they are strangely absent from the papers submitted by [City of Syracuse defendants] in defense of their actions toward plaintiff James Deferio, a Christian evangelical who regularly proselytizes at the Central New York Pride Parade and Festival ...."
The religion this church administers is Americanism, a species of nationalism.
Can an American court punish a speaker for his speech, on the theory that he breached an agreement not to speak -- all the while keeping the speech-restrictive agreement secret?
The state uses a panel of partisan officials with absolute discretion to determine who gets to vote again
It's by Jacob Mchangama, and presented by (among others) the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.
"I could really give a f**k about protecting the privacy of abusers."
A prediction comes true, for better or worse ....
The bill's backers say talking about Polish complicity in Nazi genocide is a form of group defamation.
More censorship creep in Europe, which already forbids a wide range of claims about history.
"There is no notary in Fulton County named Amanda Sparks.... The notarization by Amanda Sparks is a forgery.... Connie Hood and Jesse Wood are not real. Connie Hood and Jesse Wood were fabricated in order to obtain a stipulated order of permanent injunction removing criticism of Adam Lynd from the internet.... Howard Marks is not real.... Robert Smith is not real.... Damon Lentz is not real...."
But partisan Democrats tried to use a fake news scare to quash it anyway.
Parents aren't neglecting to keep their kids safe from laundry detergent. If anything, teens are overprotected.
State senator proposes mandatory minimums for repeat First Amendment violators.
Any excuse to try to censor the internet
Illinois and Texas think biometric identifiers are a lawsuit waiting to happen.
When government officials suppress critics, they do so only to help themselves.
Critics of free speech use the same old arguments on new technologies.
I'm all for carefully reading the words of the Constitution, and applying the distinctions that it draws -- but we need to make sure we're understanding just what those distinctions are.
Many restrictions on liberty may be unwise and wrong -- but not unconstitutional.
Will Baude and I have cosigned a new amicus brief on this in Janus v. AFSCME.
The government now says it will prosecute only those it can prove committed specific criminal acts.
The latest twist in the Barley House case -- and my attempt to intervene.
Because "there is a First Amendment right to videotape police officers while they are conducting their official duties in public," that right applies even over the objections of the people being arrested by the officers.
The crucial difference is not temperamental but institutional.
And that's so even if the van is red, white, and blue.
McCain and Jeff Flake are right to slam the president's juvenile rhetoric, but questionably blame Trump for global trends while neglecting the press crackdowns of his predecessor.
Both Democrats and Republicans are missing the mark when they call for the government to control the flow of information on the internet.
The reason: Steven Spielberg shot some scenes for Schindler's List in Israel.
A likely-fatal blow to to the state's censorious "ag gag" law
Richard Rynearson's online criticisms of Clarence Moriwaki, the court held, were protected by the First Amendment, and thus couldn't justify an antistalking order.
They used to call themselves supporters of limited government. Some still do.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks