You Don't Lose Your Right to Anonymity Just Because You Lost a Lawsuit
An appeals court defends anonymous speech.
An appeals court defends anonymous speech.
An investigation would've taken months, so Larksville Police decided to skip that part.
This is a clear-cut case of unconstitutional compelled speech with an easy verdict.
"Bikinis can convey the very type of political speech that lies at the core of the First Amendment," writes federal judge.
Public accommodation laws clash with freedom of religion and compelled speech.
A legal fight involving the alt-right, Trump voters, one of Washington, D.C.'s most powerful law firms, and the website 4chan is brewing.
"No pony has ever attacked an American politician," the lawsuit notes.
The point seems to elude The New York Times.
He did make the mistake of having his picture taken with Milo Yiannopoulos.
Joseph Stiglitz is the George Costanza of economists: Every instinct he has, do the opposite.
Elizabeth Nolan Brown argues in The New York Times that we can thank "feminism, but also free markets" for the ongoing purge of predatory men.
What do the Catholic Church, the ACLU, PETA, and Milo Yiannopoulos have in common? None of them can buy ads on the D.C. subway.
"It's dangerous to say that a topic is off the table just because it might be a little bit controversial," says the Wilfrid Laurier University student.
General counsel for the university system tries to slip in long-condemned policy.
In a Fifth Column interview, FCC chair announces the beginning of the end of Title II regulatory classification of Internet companies, frets about the culture of free speech, and calls social-media regulation "a dangerous road to cross."
The government is regularly excluded when we use the word "violence."
A Fifth Column shoutfest with former Daily Caller opinion editor Rob Mariani, who was recently bounced for publishing Milo Yiannopoulos
It's another of a panoply of ways to silence opinions academics and students disagree with.
Is the state violating Peggy Fontenot's First-Amendment rights?
The Supreme Court agrees to hear the First Amendment case Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky.
Crisis pregnancy centers in California say the state's "Reproductive FACT Act" violates their First Amendment rights.
The Black Students' Organization thinks the College Republicans are peddling violent speech.
Information-and, yes, misinformation-flows more easily and cheaply than ever, making access nearly universal. That's a good thing.
Students are split on whether the government should restrict hate speech.
Do not ignore the self-interest of elected officials in controlling online political messaging.
Stop scapegoating Russia for America's divisions—and stop using Moscow as an excuse to call for restrictions on speech.
If our democracy cannot survive another 43 hours of political videos on YouTube, it is already doomed.
Contrite university president offers a tepid defense of the First Amendment.
How can you re-program the thinking of boorish college students when their free speech guarantees get in the way?
Angry protesters shut down Tommy Robinson event.
Trying to minimize those divisions isn't very democratic.
Russian panic is the excuse to try to control online speech.
Libertarian-leaning Republicans who endorsed Moore should hang their heads in shame
Ajit Pai notes that his agency has no authority to consider journalistic content in making license decisions.
This week's show covers the Iran nuclear deal, threats to the First Amendment, the Harvey Weinstein scandal, and Trump's latest moves on health care.
Our norms are being eroded by "both sides" of the partisan battle.
This is your brain on campus activism
No, the president actually doesn't have the right to say whatever he wants.
What I saw at the latest campus free speech controversy.
"Setting aside the fact that the FCC doesn't license cable channels," Ajit Pai said last month, "these demands are fundamentally at odds with our legal and cultural traditions."
The web host can redact user info unless the Justice Department provides evidence of criminal activity.
Most either think hate speech isn't protected by the First Amendment or aren't sure.
Worry over Russia's "influence" on U.S. politics is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of free speech.
The rules' purpose is to "indoctrinate pregnant women into the belief held by some...Christians that a separate and unique human being begins at conception" said appeals court.