Court Rules in Favor of Pro-Life Protesters Arrested for Chalk Messages
While chalking on D.C. sidewalks and streets is illegal, the protesters say they were targeted for their beliefs.
While chalking on D.C. sidewalks and streets is illegal, the protesters say they were targeted for their beliefs.
Plus: Court urged to stop Arkansas' social media age verification law from taking effect in September, legalizing medical marijuana linked to lower insurance premiums, and more...
For now, doctors who end pregnancies when a woman’s life is at risk can still be prosecuted.
Plus: What media gets wrong about "book bans," Yellow Corporation to default on $700 million pandemic aid loan, and more...
by the First Amendment, even if the abortion would be illegal in the state, holds a federal judge in Idaho.
Plus: More takes on the Trump indictment, Biden's new student loan plan is here, and more...
Plus: California tries to stop professors from testifying in suit over COVID education policies, state Republicans aren't all abandoning free market economics, and more...
Abortion and privacy activists join over concerns that cell phones track our movements.
A study from researchers at Johns Hopkins is the first to look at the effects of Texas' 2021 "Heartbeat Act" on live births.
Plus: Court rules against judge who threw child stars in jail during parents' custody dispute, inside the FTC's attempt to stop Microsoft from acquiring Call of Duty, and more...
Legal scholar Julie Suk argues the answer is "yes." The idea has a solid basis in natural rights theory, but is at odds with longstanding legal doctrine. It also has potentially very broad libertarian implications.
Plus: APA says social media not inherently harmful for kids, senators propose Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Agency, and more...
Plus: The "Kids Online Safety Act" is back and as bad as ever, expect another interest rate hike today, and more…
Americans’ opinions are more nuanced than headlines suggest, leaving little room for total bans.
"Once a woman became pregnant for any reason, she would now become property of the state of South Carolina," said one state senator.
It's one small victory for free speech and due process, but similar battles continue to play out elsewhere.
If a national consensus on abortion ever emerges, it won’t be forged in the White House.
Mifepristone will remain on the market for now with no changes to how it can be prescribed.
Plus: More secrecy from the Global Disinformation Index, the public awaits another big Supreme Court abortion decision, and more...
The appeals court's unpublished order avoids some of the district court's errors, but still has some significant problems, especially with regard to standing.
It’s not the FDA’s job to tell doctors what to do.
Plus: New developments in the Texas abortion drug ruling, fallout from the Riley Gaines event at SFSU, and more...
Plus: The editors respond to a listener question concerning corporate personhood.
The divergent orders from judges in Washington state and Texas may bring the battle over mifepristone to the Supreme Court.
On Good Friday, two district courts issued decisions on the FDA's approval of the abortion drug mifepristone.
Litigation over abortion drugs turns disagreements about individual rights into a bureaucratic tussle.
Plus: Australia's failed news media bargaining code, two ways government created an Adderall shortage, and more...
Abortion and gerrymandering are likely to be on the court's docket in the near future, and Janet Protasiewicz ran unabashedly to the left on both issues. Is this the best way to decide contentious topics?
Second in a two-part series published by Australian Outlook, a publication of the Australian Institute for International Affairs.
"Taking that child across the border, and if that happens without the permission of the parent, that's where we'll be able to hold accountable those that would subvert a parent's right," said one of the bill's sponsors.
And this lawsuit faces many of the same administrative law hurdles as does AHM v. FDA.
ADF's Erin Hawley responds to my post on the jurisdictional problems in AHM v. FDA and I reply.
It examines whether people are likely to "vote with their feet" based on interstate differences in abortion policy, after Dobbs. The first in a series of two articles on this topic.
A nominee's work defending a state parental-notification law in 2005 may be a stumbling block to his confirmation.
The Court's newest justice questions whether her colleagues are too quick to vacate lower court decisions.
Plus: ACLU sues over low-flying helicopter during protests, Canada's Online News Act, and more...
"I know either way he will use it against me.... And after the fact, I know he will try to act like he has some right to the decision," said the woman in text messages to her friends named as defendants in the suit.
The law allows abortions when there is a "medical emergency"—but what qualifies as an emergency?
There's been lots of heat, but very little light in coverage and commentary about the lawsuit seeking to revoke FDA approval of mifepristone.
Plus: States move to curtail internet anonymity, Amsterdam cracks down on cannabis, sex, and booze, and more...
"I pray wherever I go, inside my head, for the people around me," said one priest. "How can it be a crime for a priest to pray?"