The Army Corps and EPA were happy to have the Trump Administration rule remanded, as they are working on a more expansive replacement that will itself face legal challenge.
In a speech aimed at proponents of perpetual war, the president refused to apologize for exiting Afghanistan.
But numerous politicians and war hawks were duped by seeing what they wanted to see.
The health program won't be able to pay all of its bills starting in 2026, according to a new Trustees report.
If all sensible people agree that students should be forced to wear masks, why do other countries reject that policy?
Contributions from Katsas, Maggs, Stras, Ho, Hardy, Ryan, Rao, and Garnett
"What has gotten materially better in America in, say, the last twenty years?" So! Much!
My cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court asks it review the Eleventh Circuit en banc's decision concluding that Epstein's victims cannot enforce their right to confer with prosecutors under the Crime Victims' Rights Act because the Department never formally filed charges against Epstein.
A federal judge suggests that dissents from en banc denial make the courts seem too political. Others might think such dissents serve a useful purpose, including the flagging of important questions (and significant errors) for Supreme Court review.
Plus: Backpage on trial, Texas abortion providers ask SCOTUS to stop ban, vegan "butter" and "cheese" are safe, and more…
Twenty-five years ago, the official biographer was paid $600,000. Timothy Flanigan is in no hurry.
It's the Oxford English Dictionary of quotations.
Howard Bailey spent years serving his country, supporting his family, and running two small businesses. Then he got kicked out of the country.
The government appoints itself the nation's parent.
The college's absurd COVID-19 countermeasures are the strictest in the nation.
How the past two years of COVID-19 can better inform how we go about the next two
Not everything potentially beneficial should be mandatory and not everything potentially harmful should be banned. And not every dispute about costs and benefits should be decided by the federal government.
"It’s OK that our babies may not have learned all their times tables," says Cecily Myart-Cruz. "They learned resilience."
The agency returns to a research area where it has caused much controversy in the past.
Co-sponsored by the Institute for Justice's Center for Judicial Engagement and Scalia Law's Liberty and Law Center, you can attend in-person or virtually.
Legislators advance bills that would allow duplexes statewide and make it easier for local governments to legalize small apartment buildings.
The deadly Sunday explosion is a reminder of the hundreds of civilians U.S. strikes have killed in Afghanistan.
Who thought it was a good idea to give the government control over marketing?
The first truly accurate and thorough quotation dictionary just got even more accurate and thorough.
Business owners in the Bronx respond to New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s vaccine passport mandate.
"The pandemic's wrongest man" can likely profit from martyrdom.
Plus: Kids got more obese during the pandemic, how Section 230 protects gun rights, and more...
Even supporters of the law should recognize the dangers of using enforcement as punishment.
This article for the Cato Supreme Court Review—my fourth—considers the legal arguments that California v. Texas declined to reach.
The court rejects the argument that publicity about the lawsuit might taint jury pool, and "has imposed a deep emotional burden upon [church's] current members, imposes a possibility of some clients of the church's weekly meal, food pantry, counseling programs, or other services withdrawing their participation [and] imposes a possibility of loss of donors."
A sharp departure from the Trump administration's approach
An excellent opportunity for would-be legal academics; applications are due September 15.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks