A Rare SCOTUS Case That Pitted Thomas Against Alito
Plus: Does Trump expect to lose the birthright citizenship case?
Plus: Does Trump expect to lose the birthright citizenship case?
The governor is threatening to defund the police because of an ordinance noting that an ICE administrative warrant "does not justify a stop, arrest, or continued detention" by city officers.
Contrary to what some believe, the Clean Power Plan was not the first executive branch action stopped on the "Shadow Docket."
More of what's been absent from discussions of the recently released Supreme Court memoranda, with commentary by Davis and Re.
Plus: a credible new report on the Alito retirement rumors.
The professional-ethics implications of making court confidences public.
A critique of the New York Times "unfortunately tendentious reporting about the memoranda."
The leak of internal Supreme Court memos could affect how the Court operates.
A New York Times scoop reveals that Chief Justice Roberts was concerned that the EPA would (again) get away with imposing unlawful burdens on utilities.
The Court's 1963 ruling in Bantam Books v. Sullivan is freshly relevant in light of recent efforts to restrict speech through government intimidation.
Remembering the infuriating case of United States v. “The Spirit of ’76.”
Plus: The Alito retirement rumors keep swirling.
Adler v. Shugerman on the Supreme Court's handling of separation of powers concerns on the "shadow docket."
The case will determine whether an unnamed plaintiff can take the hospital and its doctors to federal court.
The Court of International Trade is weighing the legality of the import taxes that the president wants to impose under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
It is often useful to consult the original source.
It was surprising that the Solicitor General did not appear to have thought much about the extent of Congress' legislative power under Section 5.
How the digital privacy rights of millions are at stake in Chatrie v. United States.
Two petitions ask the Supreme Court to uphold the remedy required by the Fifth Amendment.
The Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause promises "just compensation" when private property is taken for public use. But some courts have ruled that it does not always apply when police are involved.
The Administration's constitutional arguments are unconvincing, but rejecting them is not necessary to decide United States v. Barbara
Understanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiles v. Salazar.
"No statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have," U.S. District Judge Richard Leon concluded when he enjoined the project.
Both Donald Trump and Joe Biden asked the Supreme Court to abolish nationwide injunctions, which allow federal judges to stop a federal policy from going into effect.
There are far too few checks left on executive power.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara.
There was little rhyme or reason to the president's "emergency" tariffs, which fluctuated wildly depending on his mood.
Understanding the stakes in Trump v. Barbara.
The case could give the Court a chance to clarify what a "closely regulated" business is and what constitutional protections it enjoys.
Plus: What George Orwell thought about Friedrich Hayek.
Despite its rejection of the Biden administration's interference, the Trump administration is still asserting authority over online speech.
The president and his new DHS secretary are enraged by jurists and legislators who refuse to toe the party line.
The justice dissented from the Supreme Court's denial of a petition from a Texas journalist who was charged with felonies for practicing journalism.
What’s at stake in Watson v. Republican National Committee.
But for a fraudulent and misleading warrant affidavit, Taylor would not have been killed during a fruitless late-night drug raid.
The president says federal courts should not make decisions based on partisan considerations unless it benefits him.
The Republican stalwart thought he could wield more power from the Senate than he ever could from the Supreme Court.
Plus: Brian Doherty, RIP.
"Freedom of speech and of press is accorded aliens residing in this country," according to a 1945 Supreme Court ruling.
The FCC chairman's reasoning is faulty.
The article explains how all the standard arguments for denying birthright ctizenship to children of undocumented immigrants are at odds with the main purpose of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
More than eight decades ago, the Supreme Court invented a vague First Amendment exception that would-be censors continue to invoke.
What happens if both political parties come to distrust the Court’s judgment?
The ban, which targets guns based on criteria that make little sense, seems vulnerable to a challenge under the Supreme Court's Second Amendment precedents.
Mark Chenoweth discusses the SEC’s gag rule, the power of the administrative state, and the legal battle over whether regulators can silence their critics.
The president’s invocation of Section 122 conflates a trade deficit with a balance-of-payments deficit.
The judiciary is largely absent from the long-running constitutional debate over undeclared foreign wars.
A Federalist Society forum on the first big case of OT 2026.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.