It's Official: Trump Nominates Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court
If confirmed, she would cement a strong 6-3 conservative majority.
If confirmed, she would cement a strong 6-3 conservative majority.
What I wrote in 2016 still applies today.
Progressives are promising to get rid of this long-standing check on the power of raw majorities in the Senate just when it would help them the most.
Reviewing the record of the SCOTUS shortlister.
The SCOTUS contender's 2019 dissent will alarm gun control supporters but reassure people who want judges to take this constitutional provision as seriously as others.
The idea has a lot of merit. But it will be hard to enact, and probably won't do much to end partisan conflict over Supreme Court appointments.
The case is an encouraging sign that the SCOTUS contender is not the sort of judge who bends over backward to shield cops from liability for outrageous misconduct.
Limiting justices to a single 18-year term would de-escalate judicial confirmation fights.
The restrictions imagined by Republicans in 2016 or by Democrats now are nothing but self-serving nonsense.
The prospects are far from ideal. But it is still potentially feasible.
The fight to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg reveals a long-degraded political culture.
While the 7th Circuit judge is often skeptical of the government's position, some of her conclusions will give pause to civil libertarians.
Plus: Trump wants to rob TikTok to pay for "patriotic education," the CDC can't confirm any cases of airplane spread, Virginia uses new "red flag" gun law, and more...
Simply put: Republicans agree not to vote on a replacement for Ginsburg until January; Democrats agree not to pack the Court.
What's next for SCOTUS?
The passing of a feminist heroine, and a giant of American jurisprudence.
Her death creates a vacancy on the Supreme Court just weeks before the presidential election and is likely to spark a major political fight.
October arguments will be over the phone again.
Like it or not, this is the Roberts Court now.
The federal definition of child pornography does not encompass risqué dancing by clothed 11-year-olds.
This year's annual confab is remote, but will still feature the annual B. Kenneth Simon Lecture and release of the Cato Supreme Court Review.
Walter Barnette didn't know that his own land had been sold out from under him until it had already happened.
The 5th Circuit judge is a mixed bag from a libertarian perspective.
Plus: The case for paying plasma donors, Joe Arpaio welcomes furries, and more...
This court-invented doctrine shields bad cops from civil liability.
City officials repeatedly gave activists false information about the requirements for getting their initiative on the ballot.
Last month, the 9th Circuit said the opposite. It's a question the Supreme Court might have to resolve.
A collection of essays analyzing one of the more important administrative law decisions of the October 2019 term.
According to the appeals court, the relevant question is what legislators were trying to accomplish.
Two sets of states, the House of Representatives and Solicitor General all get argument time.
When it comes to the Supreme Court, the answer is clearly "no." Things are less clear when it comes to the lower federal courts.
The Democratic presidential candidate favors the same magazine limit that a federal appeals court just declared unconstitutional.
A preliminary assessment of Trump v. Mazars and Trump v. Vance.
What sort of judicial nominee can we expect from the Democratic candidate?
Just like millions of their fellow Americans, the justices would have to adjust to the strange new realities of social distancing and working from home.
Its approval rating - 58 percent - is at its highest level since 2009, far outstripping the other two branches of government. That doesn't prove the justices are doing a good job, but will make it harder to pursue court-packing or other attacks on the Court.
Yet again, the Chief Justice shows his distaste for preliminary injunctions.
The episode reflects poorly on Biden.
The former New York Times SCOTUS reporter does not seem to understand the arguments she is criticizing.
The Chief Justice's votes against injunctive relief for churches, voters, and those on death row are of a piece.
A bust of the Dred Scott author stands in the old Supreme Court chambers in the capitol.
SCOTUS is the least democratic branch. Is that a bad thing?
A surprisingly agreeable chat on originalism, the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts and other things.
The state has barred hundreds of thousands of residents with felony records from voting without first paying off their court fines and fees.
Two centuries of precedents say the president is not immune from judicial process.
A quick scramble to end a man’s life, despite objections by attorneys and even the relatives of his victims