Flock Cameras Face Growing Resistance at the Ballot Box
Americans are voting for greater transparency and involvement in whether and how they are monitored, regardless of political ideology.
Americans are voting for greater transparency and involvement in whether and how they are monitored, regardless of political ideology.
Centralized databases and national ID systems make tempting targets.
A judge ruled that the border agency has to give a clearer explanation for why it seized a traveler’s phone without a warrant.
Opposition to license plate surveillance is crossing party lines in Iowa, where police departments have built an extensive camera network with limited public oversight.
CBP allegedly told the nurse that “your lawyer cannot do anything” and agents can take the data “the easy way or the hard way.”
The feds are charging Samuel Tunick for destroying his phone at the border. Court documents show that they refused him a lawyer and lied about why he was searched.
A former assistant state attorney and an immigrant rights activist both had their phones seized, despite having attorney-client privilege. They're suing to protect their data.
That means his ex-wife can talk about it on a podcast if she wants to. But you probably shouldn’t follow suit.
Benn Jordan wants the snoopers to be “a little unsettled.”
The U.S. government responded in ways that are so integrated into daily life that we no longer recognize them.
From wrongful arrests to officers stalking exes, license plate cameras keep exposing police failures.
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission says it followed the law when it pulled the driving records of more than a dozen critics of the agency.
Wearable bright patterns, infrared lights, and reflective coatings challenge the surveillance state.
Who cares if Bryon Noem likes pretending to have giant breasts?
The president is much less concerned about the law's potential for overreach now that he's in charge of the government wielding it.
The Trump administration will start collecting social media account information on immigration forms.
The Department of Homeland Security argues it doesn't need a warrant to enter a construction site.
A proposed rule change would allow routine gathering of biometric data without a warrant.
Proponents say such IDs will make life easier and protect kids from dangerous content. But opponents worry they will make you much easier to target.
Nobody expects China or Iran to protect privacy. But as seen in the European debate over chat control, even nominally free countries are becoming intrusive when it comes to the digital world.
ICE and Border Patrol are using license plate cameras for extensive domestic surveillance.
Senate Judiciary Committee head reveals legislators’ communications were monitored.
Officials at the border have the power to paw through sensitive data on your phone.
To make us safer, the feds required standardized ID and one-stop shopping for identity thieves.
Detroit lawyer Amir Makled has confidential client data on his phone. That didn’t stop U.S. Customs and Border Protection from trying to search it.
Know how much the law does—and doesn’t—protect your privacy rights.
Border officials reportedly barred the academic from visiting Texas after finding anti-Trump messages on his phone.
The bill is a "law against criticism of any kind," according to a lawyer who testified against it.
Public records obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation show how sensitive police databases are used and abused.
The Bank Secrecy Act regime forces banks to report customers to the government for an ever-growing list of “red flags.”
Some IRS offices routinely threw away sensitive material with regular trash, while others used unlocked or damaged storage bins.
Supposedly targeted at immigrants and travelers, the program endangers everybody’s liberty.
A lawyer who should know better wants to ignore the history of snooping cops to fight guns and crime.
Customs and Border Protection insists that it can search electronics without a warrant. A federal judge just said it can't.
While the decision is great news for Tennesseans, it's only the first step in reclaiming Americans' property rights against the open fields doctrine.
The plaintiffs are challenging the state's widespread surveillance, which it collects through over 600 cameras.
The Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act would prevent law enforcement and intelligence agencies from purchasing data that they would otherwise need a warrant to obtain.
The surveillance yielded 49 arrests, of which 42 were for possession or sale of narcotics.
While not perfect, the move is a step in the right direction for civil liberties.
Facial recognition technology is increasingly being deployed by police officers across the country, but the scope of its use has been hard to pin down.
Plus: State officials attempt to ban Donald Trump from 2024 election ballots.
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.