Google Cracks Down on Employees' Political Speech
The unsurprising result of conservatives complaining about Big Tech bias: less speech, not more
The unsurprising result of conservatives complaining about Big Tech bias: less speech, not more
Sealed memos fought over in federal court last week show authorities have known for years that claims about Backpage were bogus.
Liability safe harbors for Internet intermediaries are not responsible for Internet "hate speech"
While expressing concern for free speech and privacy, lawmakers are seriously threatening both.
Editor in Chief Kyle Mann talks about being taken literally by fact checkers, whether any subject (even a mass shooting) is off limits, and the libertarian sensibility of his humor.
Plus: 8chan called before Congress, data privacy bill hits a snag, and more...
Companies should forced neither to help spread offensive speech nor to suppress it.
Plus: the trouble with "national conservatism," the decline of the mortgage interest deduction, and more...
The Missouri senator thinks wasting time on Instagram is a problem so big that only the federal government can solve it.
From Josh Hawley to Kamala Harris, online free speech is under attack.
Aggressive asset forfeiture collides with First Amendment rights.
The idea that the internet should enjoy minimal government oversight precisely because it was a technology that enabled open and free speech for everyone has been turned on its head.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R–Mo.) has proposed a dreadful bill that would give the government control of internet content. He thinks the only reason anyone could be opposed is because they've been bought off.
"Section 230 has nothing to do with neutrality. Nothing. Zip. There is absolutely no weight to that argument," Wyden says. He oughta know. He wrote the damn thing.
"Support of the Trump administration is undeniably support for white supremacy."
Plus: Immigration officials confirm Trump tweets about new raids, Elizabeth Warren talks sex work decriminalization, and more...
Hawley is selling it as a way to fight tech-company "bias" against Republicans. Don't believe him.
Be afraid as more journalists and politicians start calling for stronger policing of online speech.
Despite scant evidence, everyone wants to believe that social media has a unique ability to control our thoughts and actions.
In his new book, Fall, the author of Snow Crash, Cryptonomicon, and The Diamond Age, looks to the digital afterlife, and beyond.
The "blogfather" once touted the internet as the antidote to Big Government, Big Business, and Big Media. Now he wants the feds to crack down on social media.
In the best of all possible worlds, such actions wouldn't be necessary. In the current climate, boycotting social media might spark a return to a robust marketplace of ideas.
Social media platforms and governments are "voluntarily" teaming up to ban "violent extremist content." What could go wrong?
The supposed plague of misleading and harmful information on the internet is nothing new, nor is governments' desire to muzzle anybody who says inconvenient things.
Co-founder Chris Hughes' call for antitrust action is vainglorious and misguided.
Legal scholar Jeff Kosseff wanted to write a "biography" of Section 230, the law that immunizes websites and ISPs from a lot of legal actions. He fears he has written its obituary.
Subreddits on sexual themes will also be banned from running ads.
Nancy Pelosi wants to gut Section 230
Censorship continues to be about empowering those in charge.
Will a thirst to punish Silicon Valley destroy our liberty?
He's got his reasons, but they all suck. And will accelerate Facebook's decline as a destination in cyberspace.
Facebook and the end of the open Internet era
Under pressure, democracies have a nasty habit of acting like panicked crowds.
Plus: Senators move to end warrantless NSA spying and the "Paycheck Fairness Act" passes the House.
Do you have a license to link to that story? Will your sexy Tinder photo get confused with a celebrity's?
But that might not stop House Democrats from Net Neutrality-related histrionics.
Europeans want the best of America's online services, even as the government keeps soaking them for billions.
With big tech helping government officials to control the sharing of information, we need to support alternatives to undermine their censorious efforts.
Plus: Reason web-culture coverage past...introducing the millennial presidential candidate...another Seattle "sex trafficking" case based on nonsense
There's no room for errors and online platforms face huge fines, likely encouraging overly broad takedowns.
Plus: Facebook says it's pivoting to privacy, and congressional Democrats want to "save the internet."
Jordan Shapiro's The New Childhood boldly embraces technological innovation and the interconnected world it's creating.
Preliminary FCC report claims the number of Americans with high-speed connections grew by 20 percent in 2017.
Here's how to navigate America's newest ritual.
As the lawsuit against FOSTA hits appeals court, three essays about the law that everyone should read.
Big publishers want new sources of revenue. But trying to force license fees for linking will backfire.
Gun buyers, gay lovers, cannabis customers, and Yelp users are just a few of the groups that benefit from this federal law.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10