Did Republicans Buy the Argument That Impeachment Requires a Crime?
While some senators seemed to endorse that misbegotten claim, others explicitly rejected it.
While some senators seemed to endorse that misbegotten claim, others explicitly rejected it.
What’s at stake in Michigan v. Wood
The framers of the Constitution were quite right that wars should be difficult to start and easy to end.
He says "criminal-like behavior akin to treason or bribery" is enough, even if it's not "a technical crime with all the elements."
The article explains why the Supreme Court was justified in overruling longstanding precedent in this important recent constitutional property rights case.
The president’s lawyers argue that abuse of power is not impeachable unless it breaks the law.
The Supreme Court agrees to hear two cases on the scope of presidential elector discretion
The Government Accountability Office says Trump's spending delay was illegal.
It's crucial to get the constitutional text and history straight.
Is the Rule of Law a Law of Rules or a Law of Law? Some conservatives seem to prefer the former. Should they?
The legal basis for such a ruling is hard to find.
Plus: Tarriffs are killing U.S. wine, Vermont bill would ban cell phones for kids, and more...
The former press secretary thinks abiding by the Constitution would be the worst thing for America right now.
Plus: Rand Paul says White House's war-powers arguments are "absurd," the Cato Institute wants Congress to investigate the FBI, and more...
Gig workers and companies are suing over a California law, AB 5, that criminalizes their continued employment.
The shifting understanding of the requirement to buy health insurance elevates form above substance.
Plus: States sue to stop Equal Rights Amendment, French sex workers take prostitution laws to E.U. court of human rights, and more...
Her lobbying tax proposal is pseudo-policy, a veneer of wonky seriousness over dubious populist dogma.
The greatest threat to protections for our freedom may be people's fear that people who disagree with them are exercising their rights.
No constitutional provision should be ignored just because it may be difficult to discern
Banzai! Can surface rights owners control the rights of those who own the mineral rights underneath? In this case, yes.
“If the Court is serious about protecting freedom of expression, we should grant review.”
Several justices seem skeptical of the claim that revising the rules after SCOTUS agreed to consider a challenge to them made the case moot.
The justices will hear oral arguments today in a major Second Amendment case.
The Oregon Supreme Court says police may not grill drivers or ask to search their cars without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
An important development in the legal wrangling over the separation of powers.
“The evidence of his impeachable behavior at this point, in my view, is overwhelming," says the Fox News analyst.
The legendary jurist and champion of "originalism" who withdrew his name from Supreme Court consideration weighs in on Donald Trump's impeachment, Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch, and his upcoming PBS series on the Constitution.
The new federal ban on animal cruelty converts the Commerce Clause into a general police power.
A recently-filed cert petition gives the Court a good opportunity to rule on the constitutional role of presidential electors
The Founders liked militias, but they also liked an armed citizenry. To them, the two ideas were inseparable.
Where does Congress get the authority to redundantly criminalize abuse of mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles?
Unfortunately, rather than challenging Warren on the constitutionality of her plans, Biden is imitating them, at least when it comes to the assault on the First Amendment.
Understanding what’s at stake in Ramos v. Louisiana.
Plus: FBI rebuked by FISA court, how Harris could come back, and more…
The article explains why we should do away with legal doctrines that largely exempt immigration restrictions from constitutional constraints that apply to virtually every other exercise of government power.
Heller, Citizens United, Stevens, McDonald, Snyder, Brown, and NFIB
Gratz, Grutter, Lawrence, McConnell, Raich, Kelo, McCreary County, and Van Orden
Lopez, Seminole Tribe, Romer, Virginia, City of Boerne, Printz, Morrison
Dole, Morrison, Johnson, Smith, New York, R.A.V., Casey, Church of the Lukumi
Congress takes up the issue of "acquitted conduct."
Roe, Frontiero, Buckley, Craig, Bakke, Penn Central, and Cleburne
Brown, Bolling, Lee Optical, Cooper, Sherbert, Sullivan, Heart of Atlanta, McClung, Griswold, Loving, and O'Brien
Wickard, Korematsu, and Youngstown
Qualified immunity protects cops from liability for actions that would land ordinary people in jail.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10