Congress Tortures the Constitution To Obtain Permission for a Federal Animal Cruelty Law
Where does Congress get the authority to redundantly criminalize abuse of mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles?
Where does Congress get the authority to redundantly criminalize abuse of mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles?
Unfortunately, rather than challenging Warren on the constitutionality of her plans, Biden is imitating them, at least when it comes to the assault on the First Amendment.
Understanding what’s at stake in Ramos v. Louisiana.
Plus: FBI rebuked by FISA court, how Harris could come back, and more…
The article explains why we should do away with legal doctrines that largely exempt immigration restrictions from constitutional constraints that apply to virtually every other exercise of government power.
Heller, Citizens United, Stevens, McDonald, Snyder, Brown, and NFIB
Gratz, Grutter, Lawrence, McConnell, Raich, Kelo, McCreary County, and Van Orden
Lopez, Seminole Tribe, Romer, Virginia, City of Boerne, Printz, Morrison
Dole, Morrison, Johnson, Smith, New York, R.A.V., Casey, Church of the Lukumi
Congress takes up the issue of "acquitted conduct."
Roe, Frontiero, Buckley, Craig, Bakke, Penn Central, and Cleburne
Brown, Bolling, Lee Optical, Cooper, Sherbert, Sullivan, Heart of Atlanta, McClung, Griswold, Loving, and O'Brien
Wickard, Korematsu, and Youngstown
Qualified immunity protects cops from liability for actions that would land ordinary people in jail.
O'Gorman, Stromberg., Nebbia, Schechter Poultry, West Coast Hotel, Jones & Laughlin Steel, Carolene Products, Darby
Buchanan, Hammer, Schenck, Debs, Abrams, Penn. Coal, Adkins, Meyer, Pierce, Gitlow, and Buck
Cruikshank, Strauder, Civil Rights Cases, Yick Wo, Hans, E.C. Knight, Plessy, Champion, Lochner, and Muller
Putting up with some drag-queen storytelling seems like a small price to pay to live in a relatively free society.
Prigg, Dred Scott, Merryman, Dewitt, Hepburn, Knox, Slaughter-House, and Bradwell
Chisholm, Marbury, McCulloch, Gibbons, and Barron
An Interactive Web Site To Explore the 100 Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know
This book and video series teaches the narrative of constitutional law as it has developed over the past two centuries.
The Democratic presidential field is not interested in your puny restraints on the executive branch.
Hopefully the White House can refrain from creating any new constitutional conundrums for a semester.
Going beyond criticism, the resolution would punish the NRA and its supporters by cutting off contractors with ties to the group.
Plus: millennials are buying homes after all, protecting Pinterest from anti-vaxxers, and more...
Conservatives who argue that the video platform is constrained by the First Amendment are forsaking their constitutional principles.
Nick Tomboulides of U.S. Term Limits says the best way to shrink government is to limit how long legislators can serve.
As part of its ambitious “1619” inquiry into the legacy of slavery, The New York Times revives false 19th century revisionist history about the American founding.
The five Democrats warn that the Court may have to be "restructured" if it keeps making decisions they don't like.
The justices would be abdicating their duty to uphold the Constitution if they let such political considerations decide legal issues.
The Democracy for All Amendment aims to mute some voices so that others can be heard.
Plus: Marijuana banking, suing Facebook, and more...
Plus: Behind the bipartisan war on internet speech, New York "decriminalizes" pot (but you'll still get fined), and more...
His border lawlessness keeps growing
The late Supreme Court justice was an inconsistent defender of civil liberties.
An admirable man with a distinguished career as a Supreme Court justice. But also the author of some of the more problematic opinions of his era.
An amendment to this year's military spending bill says the president must go to Congress before launching another war.
Aggressive asset forfeiture collides with First Amendment rights.
It's an unconventional approach befitting of an unconventional presidential candidate.
Severability doctrine & the ACA findings seem to support Judge O'Connor's ruling
An important element of standing has already been decided by the Court
Understanding NFIB v. Sebelius
The Supreme Court has used this doctrine for many years, including in the recent gerrymandering decision. But it still doesn't actually make any sense.
Despite occasional rhetoric to the contrary, neither conservative nor liberal justices are shy about overruling constitutional precedent they believe to be badly misguided. And that's a good thing.
“Our role is to enforce the Takings Clause as written.”
The Trump appointee is not impressed by the logic of the "dual sovereignty" doctrine: "Really?"
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10