The Twisted Logic of Greg Abbott's Border Policy
Undocumented immigrants aren’t the same as an invading army, but the Texas governor keeps acting like they are.
Undocumented immigrants aren’t the same as an invading army, but the Texas governor keeps acting like they are.
The Supreme Court judges Eighth Amendment cases with "evolving standards of decency." Some conservative jurists don't like it.
The weird story of Victor Berger, the Espionage Act, and "Shoeless" Joe Jackson.
On Thursday, a federal appeals court will hear about the FBI's "blatant scheme to circumvent" the Fourth Amendment.
The 4th Circuit’s rejection of Maryland’s handgun licensing system suggests similar schemes in other states are unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court will consider whether federal agencies’ administrative judges violate the Seventh Amendment.
The U.S. Supreme Court keeps putting off deciding whether to take up a challenge to New York's rent control scheme.
Joshua Garton spent nearly two weeks in jail for "manufacturing and disseminating a harassing photograph on social media." A First Amendment lawsuit quickly followed.
School officials in three states are effectively immune from lawsuits over excessive corporal punishment. A Louisiana mother is asking the Supreme Court to step in.
What Swift v. Tyson has to say to The Slaughter-House Cases
The Golden State's new rules—which Pennsylvania's Environmental Quality Board opted to copy—will increase the cost of a new truck by about one-third.
Mississippi only gives property owners 10 days to challenge a blight finding that could lead to their house being seized through eminent domain.
Why Article I's residence requirement applies to appointees.
The residence question is closer than it might appear.
The judge ruled that the law was unconstitutionally overbroad, vague, and viewpoint discrimination.
The judge ruled that drag performances are not inherently expressive and that schools could regulate "vulgar and lewd" conduct.
A long history of amending resolutions with legal effect.
The Nixon administration did everything it could to curb antiwar activism. Then the courts said it had gone too far.
Preferential college admissions violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
Politicians are throwing laws at the wall and seeing what sticks.
Plus: FIRE fights college's vague "greater good" policy, Biden administration pushes double talk on tariffs, and more...
The guidelines would ignore decades of academic findings about how firm concentration can have a positive impact on consumers' welfare.
How Florida prison officials let a man's prostate cancer progress until he was paralyzed and terminally ill.
Promoting impunity for violating rights as a policy tool? What could go wrong?
Civil forfeiture is a highly unaccountable practice. The justices have the opportunity to make it a bit less so.
The appeals court judge argued that the Israeli Supreme Court had usurped the role of legislators.
Presenters include Kermit Roosevelt (UPenn), Samantha Barbas (U. of Buffalo), Michael Mannheimer (Northern Kentucky Univ.), and myself.
The decision reverses a terrible previous decision by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Chief Justice John Roberts decisively rejected the independent state legislature theory.
Plus: A rundown of recent nonsensical proposals for constitutional amendments
California’s governor insists his “28th Amendment” would leave the right to arms “intact.”
Plus: Flaws in studies linking teen social media use to depression, debt ceiling deal passes Senate, and more...
Plus: Americans are increasingly changing religions, court pauses rejection of "free" preventative care mandate, and more...
He either doesn't understand or won't admit why this violates the First Amendment.
Baby Ninth Amendments, by Anthony Sanders
The legislation would give property owners "sole discretion" in deciding how many parking spaces they want to build.
The records confirm medical neglect in a federal women's prison that Reason first reported on in 2020.
Plus: DeSantis does better than Trump in swing-state poll, majority say abortion pill should remain available, and more...
If Congress wants to stave off such far-reaching demands, it should start behaving in ways that inspire more public confidence.
The CFPB funding scheme is constitutional, the 2nd Circuit says.
"I will not appear to condone the diminishment of any group at the expense of impertinent gestures toward another group for any reason, even when the law of the land appears to require it," he wrote.
The Constitution was intended to preserve state sovereignty, not create an all-powerful central government.
Understanding what’s at stake in United States v. Hansen
A new report details how plea bargaining can hurt defendants and warps the justice system.
Lawmakers should proactively retake the power of the purse from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, regardless of how the Supreme Court rules.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10