What Kristi Noem Gets Wrong About Habeas Corpus
The legal principle safeguards civil liberties, protecting even unpopular people from the government.
The legal principle safeguards civil liberties, protecting even unpopular people from the government.
The 1866 debate over birthright citizenship included a debate over immigration.
For nearly three years, Daniel Horwitz faced contempt of court for talking about a private prison that was one of his most frequent courtroom opponents.
The text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment run counter to Trump’s executive order.
A federal judge finally acknowledged that New York City won't fix the constitutional crisis at Rikers on its own, but the problem goes far beyond New York City.
Ozturk's continued detention "potentially chills the speech of the millions and millions of people in this country who are not citizens," said U.S. District Judge William K. Sessions III.
Impoundment, line-item vetoes, and the tricky problem of cutting spending through the executive branch
The Trump-appointed judge found that the administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act "exceeds the scope of the statute and is contrary to the plain, ordinary meaning of the statute's terms."
The memo says "Alien Enemies" aren't subject "to a judicial review of the removal in any court of the United States."
It appears many people are now eager to dispense with due process.
"We have thousands of people that are ready to go out, and you can't have a trial for all of these people," Trump said.
Plus: A listener asks who was the better president: Trump or Obama?
In Justice Abandoned, a law professor argues that the Court got these key decisions wrong.
“The Executive will lose much from a public perception of its lawlessness and all of its attendant contagions.”
"This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear," Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson warned.
Spencer Byrd's case helped spark reforms and a federal lawsuit, but he died before seeing justice.
No, the Supreme Court did not give Trump free rein in the case of a wrongly deported man.
The pro-censorship post was quite the Freudian slip from the Trump administration.
Trump lost on his most aggressive claims of executive power for the second time in a week.
The Supreme Court did not answer two of the biggest legal questions raised by Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act.
Detroit lawyer Amir Makled has confidential client data on his phone. That didn’t stop U.S. Customs and Border Protection from trying to search it.
A federal court ruled Trina Martin could not sue the government after agents burst into her home and held an innocent man at gunpoint.
The Supreme Court has ample precedent to rule against Trump’s trade war.
Alleged criminal aliens may face legal punishment. But only after receiving due process of law.
Trump wants to purge the federal bench of judges who disagree with him. Thomas Jefferson did too, and it didn't work out.
An unconstitutional act is still unconstitutional even if lots of people support it.
The White House accidentally leaked military plans in Yemen to a journalist—and demonstrated how unconstitutional U.S. war making has become.
The judge ruled that Donald Trump and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's executive orders targeting "gender ideology" can't change the fact that drag performance is expressive conduct under the First Amendment.
Linda Martin's lawsuit alleges that the agency violated her right to due process when it took her $40,200 and sent her a notice failing to articulate the reason.
The attempt to retaliate against a cinema for screening a documentary on the Israel-Palestine conflict drew national condemnation from civil rights groups and filmmakers.
Plus: Who's in charge of DOGE, protests over Israel's renewed assault on Gaza, and a tribute to the life of Manuel Klausner.
Miami Beach Mayor Steven Meiner says "disseminating antisemitism" in a taxpayer-owned building is "unjust to the values of our city and residents and should not be tolerated."
While overturning sentences through courts can take years, a grant of clemency is instantaneous.
FCC v. Consumers’ Research could dismantle a massive slush fund run by unelected regulators and industry insiders.
Texas A&M's Board of Regents voted to ban drag shows on the grounds that they objectify women and violate state and federal policies against promoting "gender ideology."
A smaller government with a more powerful set of unaccountable executive officials is unlikely to be much of a win for liberty.
Making policy and passing laws is supposed to be difficult and should be left to the messy channels established by the Constitution.
Most courts have ruled that vanity license plates are private speech and protected from viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment.
Elon Musk's vague White House role is only controversial because he's trying to slash bureaucracy.
The law is wasteful and protectionist. Now, a new lawsuit argues that it is unconstitutional too.
The president is positioning himself to have much greater control over a smaller, enfeebled federal bureaucracy.
Georgetown constitutional law professor Randy Barnett discusses the legality of DOGE, Trump's executive orders, and birthright citizenship.
To settle with the Securities and Exchange Commission, you must swear silence.
In a jaw-dropping argument, the Department of Justice claims seizing $50,000 from a small business doesn’t violate property rights because money isn’t property.
The executive order contradicts the 14th Amendment and 127 years of judicial precedent.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks