Media Outlets Shouldn't Get Public Funds, No Matter Their Political Bias
It shouldn't matter whether NPR leans right or left. Cutting its federal funding was the right move.
It shouldn't matter whether NPR leans right or left. Cutting its federal funding was the right move.
As a minority FCC member during the Bush administration, Carr condemned government interference with newsroom decisions.
Chairman Brendan Carr thinks his agency should strive to ensure that news coverage is fair and balanced—a role precluded by the First Amendment.
The notion that NPR can somehow become unbiased is about as believable as the IRS sending you a fruit basket to commend you for filing your taxes.
A recent study claiming inequality of opportunity in the sciences commits statistical and conceptual errors that make its findings meaningless.
By the end of 2025, as many as 100 million Americans could live in a state where they can be reported for protected expression.
When magazines like Scientific American are run by ideologues producing biased dreck, it only makes it more difficult to defend the institution of science itself.
Despite his cluelessness, the former president's inclination to punish constitutionally protected speech reflects his authoritarian disregard for civil liberties.
A recent American Cancer Society study reports a negligible risk from passive smoking, shedding new light on the uproar over a 2003 paper.
"I am not in the newsroom," the embattled NPR chieftain said over and over again.
A recent poll finding that 18 percent of all Americans and 32 percent of Republicans believe Taylor Swift is part of a covert conspiracy effort to help Biden win reelection. This is just one example of the broader problem of political ignorance and bias.
Preferential college admissions violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
Plus: The real message behind DeSantis' abortion anecdote, midwives sue over Alabama regulations, and more…
Asked about people in general, respondents perceive moral decline. But when asked about specific acts or people in their personal worlds, the data tell a different story.
Plus: DEI trainings don't work, a case for compensating organ donors, and more...
We asked the hot new artificial intelligence system to take four popular political quizzes. Guess what we found...
Economist Tyler Cowen argues this approach is too often neglected. But is more common than he suggests.
When it comes to political polarization, it's confirmation bias all the way down.
Plus: Virginia's vote for the ERA is too late, South Carolina moves to relax birth control prescription requirements, and more...
Republicans have seized on the dubious claims of a psychologist who thinks Big Tech is shifting millions of votes to the left.
If conservatives don't like The New York Times, they don't have to read it. Unlike in the not-so-distant past, you now have endless media options.
In new studies, many people "reported that morally good beliefs require less evidence to be justified, and that, in some circumstances, a morally good belief can be justified even in the absence of sufficient evidence."
Never mind the court order showing the child as a dependent in her care.
More implicit bias research comes under scrutiny
We need to leave ourselves room for making good when we inevitably convict the wrong people.
A new book offers a tour of the modern study of race and racism.
"These type of microaggressions occur too often on campus."
Niskanen Center President Jerry Taylor argues that we should reject libertarianism and other ideologies in favor of "moderation." But, in truth, we cannot and should not abjure ideology. Trying to do so is likely to increase bias, not curb it.
But if the show must exist, I have some ripped-from-the-headlines ideas for upcoming plots.
Trump used Twitter to blast Twitter for allegedly censoring several prominent conservative leaders.
Devin Nunes gets the Richard Spencer treatment.
Former Biscayne Park Police Chief Raimundo Atesiano is accused of arrested black men for burglaries to boost the department's image.
New study explores liberal bias of university faculty-it's worse than we thought
The New York Times drives John Stossel crazy. He wants to rip it up, because so many stories have a left-wing bias.
How can you re-program the thinking of boorish college students when their free speech guarantees get in the way?
When the press tilts in favor of higher taxes and more regulation, democracy is indeed distorted.
"Hate crimes" suspected to be motivated by racial bias have dropped, but those perceived to be motivated by gender bias nearly doubled.
The Times news columns have been openly campaigning against Trump's tax cuts from the moment they were rolled out.
But wait, where was elite media advice about dealing with news-related anxiety back during the Obama administration?
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks