A 2007 Debate Provoked by Richard Posner Illuminates the Current Clash Over Judicial Power in Israel
The appeals court judge argued that the Israeli Supreme Court had usurped the role of legislators.
The appeals court judge argued that the Israeli Supreme Court had usurped the role of legislators.
Lai's media company covered the Communist government's abuses when other Hong Kong media wouldn't.
The President strongly criticized the Supreme Court's recent decisions, but refuses to endorse radical reform.
Chief Justice John Roberts decisively rejected the independent state legislature theory.
We once ranked No. 4 in the world, according to the Heritage Foundation. Now we're 25th.
If the Florida governor wants better behavior, he should model better behavior.
Could the Court treat Justice Powell's Bakke opinion the way it treated Justice Kennedy's Rapanos opinion?
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch highlights a vital lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Plus: A listener asks if the Roundtable has given the arguments of those opposed to low-skilled immigration a fair hearing.
J.D. Vance and Co. are trying to give themselves permission to wield public power unconstitutionally.
Why the businessman launched a long shot campaign for the presidency.
The former president reminds us that claiming unbridled executive power is a bipartisan tendency.
The former president says he did not solicit election fraud; he merely tried to correct a "rigged" election. And he says he did not illegally retain government records, because they were his property.
"If there is freedom, private property, rule of law, then Latin Americans thrive," says the social media star.
Today's opinions are a requel to prior splits among the most recent Republican appointees to the Supreme Court.
Plus: The editors respond to a listener question concerning corporate personhood.
Headlines about the 34 alleged felonies seem to have obscured newly revealed information about the weakness of the charges.
Opponents of the proposed reforms are right that unlimited majority rule is a recipe for tyranny.
Plus: A listener asks the editors if the nation is indeed unraveling or if she is just one of "The Olds" now.
The case hinges on the claim that the former president tried to cover up a campaign finance violation with which he was never charged.
Opponents of the reforms favored by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition should acknowledge the threat posed by unconstrained majority rule.
The president wants to redefine federally licensed gun dealers in service of an ineffective anti-crime strategy.
The president and his predecessor both tried to impose gun control by executive fiat.
Although the law did not change, regulators suddenly decided to criminalize unregistered possession of braced pistols.
These days, he may run for president. His politics have changed.
A proposal to limit state AG (and other) forum-shopping for national injunctions.
The decision defends the separation of powers and the rule of law against an attempt to prohibit firearm accessories by administrative fiat.
Jonathan Mitchell failed in his effort to become a legal academic, so he put his theories into practice instead.
According to the former president's lawyers, his decision to retain the documents made them "personal."
The most jarring thing about Senate candidate J.D. Vance is how open he is about rejecting the rule of law.
The federal appellate judge suggests judges should focus less on social media attention, and more on ensuring their opinions are clear, succinct and correct.
The lack of statutory authority is the main issue raised by legal challenges to the plan.
The free market allows people to cooperate, fix errors, and adapt to changing circumstances.
It is hard to see how, given the contortions required to deliver the unilateral prohibition that Donald Trump demanded.
Regulators imposed the ban based on a highly implausible and counterintuitive reading of federal law.
In his Dobbs concurrence, the senior associate justice reiterates his outlying views on precedent and his belief that all substantive due process decisions were "demonstrably erroneous."
The justices hear fewer cases and decide fewer questions than they used to.
"When those charges are brought, these people are guilty," Lightfoot said.
We will get opinions on Monday, but the Court will have to average more than two opinions per day to finish before July 4.
With thirty-three opinions in argued cases yet to issue, the Supreme Court is well behind the usual pace.
Language in the American Rescue Plan Act prohibits states from using the funds "directly or indirectly" to offset lost revenues from tax cuts.
A revealing interview on the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts, climate change, and Tribe's tweeting habits.
A belated 2021 lecture sponsored by the Georgetown Center for the Constitution
The president’s COVID-19 adviser embodies the arrogance of technocrats who are sure they know what’s best for us.
The Biden administration's main priority seems to be leaving the agency's authority vague enough to allow future interventions.
That's a fundamentally anti-democratic attitude.
Clarifying the agency's authority could impede future power grabs.
The decision against the rule hinged on whether the agency had the power it asserted.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10